Communicative Health Literacy with Physicians in Healthcare Services- Results of a Hungarian Nationwide Survey

Overview

Journal BMC Public Health

Publisher Biomed Central

Date 2025 Jan 30

PMID 39885423

Authors

Frederico Epalanga Albano Israel

Ferenc Vincze

Roza Adany

Eva Biro

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: In an efficient and effective healthcare delivery, good communication plays an essential role. The communicative health literacy (COMM-HL) of the patients is an important attribute, but the number of validated COMM-HL assessment tools is low, and they do not cover all aspects of COMM-HL. That's why a new scale has been developed within an international collaboration. Our aims are to check the measurement properties of the Hungarian version of this COMM-HL questionnaire, to describe the COMM-HL of the Hungarian adult population and to investigate its determinants.

Methods: A total of 1205 adults completed the telephone interview in 2020 as part of the European Health Literacy Population Survey 2019-2021. The questionnaire included items on sociodemographic data, self-perceived health, social support and COMM-HL. The questionnaire's measurement properties were assessed using Cronbach's alpha, Spearman-Brown, and item-total correlation coefficients, while the construct validity was investigated with principal component (PCA) and confirmatory factor analysis. The determinants of the COMM-HL were investigated by linear regression.

Results: Both the value of Cronbach's alpha and the Spearman-Brown correlation were 0.87. The items belonged to one factor and 62.2% of the total variation was explained by this factor based on the PCA. The fit indices indicated that the one-factor structure of the six-item questionnaire exhibited a good fit for the data. The mean score on the COMM-HL scale was 86.8. The easiest task was explaining health concerns while getting enough time in the consultation was rated as the most difficult one. COMM-HL was lower among females, while it was higher among people aged 66-75 years (compared with 18-25 years), those with greater social support and those without financial deprivation.

Conclusions: The questionnaire can be characterized with good internal consistency and the structure of the COMM-HL questionnaire was best explained as a one factor model. In consultations with patients, the effectiveness of communication should be improved, so that patients do not feel that there is not enough time for consultation. At-risk groups with low COMM-HL need special attention during the interactions and the role of social support has to be clarified, too.

References

Brito Fernandes O, Holgyesi A, Pentek M . Patient-centred care in Hungary: Contributions to foster a policy agenda. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2022; 171:58-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.04.015. View

Rencz F, Tamasi B, Brodszky V, Gulacsi L, Weszl M, Pentek M . Validity and reliability of the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) in a national survey in Hungary. Eur J Health Econ. 2019; 20(Suppl 1):43-55. PMC: 6544590. DOI: 10.1007/s10198-019-01061-2. View

Street Jr R, Makoul G, Arora N, Epstein R . How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician-patient communication to health outcomes. Patient Educ Couns. 2009; 74(3):295-301. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.11.015. View

Schillinger D, Bindman A, Wang F, Stewart A, Piette J . Functional health literacy and the quality of physician-patient communication among diabetes patients. Patient Educ Couns. 2004; 52(3):315-23. DOI: 10.1016/S0738-3991(03)00107-1. View

Tilahun D, Abera A, Nemera G . Communicative health literacy in patients with non-communicable diseases in Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. Trop Med Health. 2021; 49(1):57. PMC: 8276450. DOI: 10.1186/s41182-021-00345-9. View

Chinn D, Mccarthy C . All Aspects of Health Literacy Scale (AAHLS): developing a tool to measure functional, communicative and critical health literacy in primary healthcare settings. Patient Educ Couns. 2012; 90(2):247-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.10.019. View

Chen X, Hay J, Waters E, Kiviniemi M, Biddle C, Schofield E . Health Literacy and Use and Trust in Health Information. J Health Commun. 2018; 23(8):724-734. PMC: 6295319. DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2018.1511658. View

Sharkiya S . Quality communication can improve patient-centred health outcomes among older patients: a rapid review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023; 23(1):886. PMC: 10464255. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09869-8. View

Mokkink L, Terwee C, Patrick D, Alonso J, Stratford P, Knol D . The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010; 63(7):737-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006. View

10.

Biro E, Vincze F, Nagy-Penzes G, Adany R . Investigation of the relationship of general and digital health literacy with various health-related outcomes. Front Public Health. 2023; 11:1229734. PMC: 10426797. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1229734. View

11.

Zrubka Z, Brito Fernandes O, Baji P, Hajdu O, Kovacs L, Kringos D . Exploring eHealth Literacy and Patient-Reported Experiences With Outpatient Care in the Hungarian General Adult Population: Cross-Sectional Study. J Med Internet Res. 2020; 22(8):e19013. PMC: 7448194. DOI: 10.2196/19013. View

12.

Perez-Stable E, El-Toukhy S . Communicating with diverse patients: How patient and clinician factors affect disparities. Patient Educ Couns. 2018; 101(12):2186-2194. PMC: 6417094. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.08.021. View

13.

Tavakoly Sany S, Behzhad F, Ferns G, Peyman N . Communication skills training for physicians improves health literacy and medical outcomes among patients with hypertension: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020; 20(1):60. PMC: 6979365. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-4901-8. View

14.

Soberg Finbraten H, Nowak P, Griebler R, Biro E, Vrdelja M, Charafeddine R . The HLS-COM-P, a New Instrument for Measuring Communicative Health Literacy in Interaction with Physicians: Development and Validation in Nine European Countries. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(18). PMC: 9517091. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191811592. View

15.

Heijmans M, Waverijn G, Rademakers J, van der Vaart R, Rijken M . Functional, communicative and critical health literacy of chronic disease patients and their importance for self-management. Patient Educ Couns. 2014; 98(1):41-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.10.006. View

16.

Terwee C, Bot S, de Boer M, van der Windt D, Knol D, Dekker J . Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006; 60(1):34-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012. View

17.

Lee S, Arozullah A, Cho Y . Health literacy, social support, and health: a research agenda. Soc Sci Med. 2004; 58(7):1309-21. DOI: 10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00329-0. View

18.

Paasche-Orlow M, Wolf M . The causal pathways linking health literacy to health outcomes. Am J Health Behav. 2007; 31 Suppl 1:S19-26. DOI: 10.5555/ajhb.2007.31.supp.S19. View

19.

Katz M, Jacobson T, Veledar E, Kripalani S . Patient literacy and question-asking behavior during the medical encounter: a mixed-methods analysis. J Gen Intern Med. 2007; 22(6):782-6. PMC: 2583801. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-007-0184-6. View

20.

Ishikawa H, Takeuchi T, Yano E . Measuring functional, communicative, and critical health literacy among diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. 2008; 31(5):874-9. DOI: 10.2337/dc07-1932. View