» Articles » PMID: 39881953

Impact of Initial Heart Rate, Diastolic Pressure, and Pulse Pressure on Prognostic Outcomes in Heart Failure Patients with Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction

Overview
Journal Int J Gen Med
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Date 2025 Jan 30
PMID 39881953
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Heart rate, diastolic pressure, and pulse pressure are key modifiable factors influencing heart failure prognosis. While heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) is a distinct subgroup of heart failure, the prognostic impact of these hemodynamic parameters in this population remains unclear, necessitating focused investigation. This study aims to elucidate their effects on HFmrEF patient outcomes.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 1,653 hFmrEF patients treated at Xiangtan Central Hospital (2015-2020). Using decision tree classification, patients were categorized based on initial heart rate (≤77 bpm and >77 bpm). The ≤77 bpm group was further divided by pulse pressure (≤37 mmHg and >37 mmHg), and the >77 bpm group by diastolic pressure (≤63 mmHg, 63-100 mmHg, and >100 mmHg). Multivariate COX regression assessed mortality associations.

Results: With a median follow-up of 33 months, overall mortality was 21.7% for heart rates ≤77 bpm and 30.4% for >77 bpm. Multivariate COX regression showed that among patients with heart rates ≤77 bpm, those with pulse pressure >37 mmHg had a higher mortality risk than those with pulse pressure ≤37 mmHg (HR 3.184; 95% CI 1.008-10.058; p=0.048). For patients with heart rates >77 bpm, those with diastolic pressure 63-100 mmHg had a lower mortality risk compared to ≤63 mmHg (HR=0.652, 95% CI: 0.450-0.943, p=0.023), with the lowest risk in patients with diastolic pressure >100 mmHg (HR=0.370, 95% CI: 0.205-0.666, p=0.001).

Conclusion: This study highlights that HFmrEF patients with heart rates ≤77 bpm and pulse pressure ≤37 mmHg had the lowest mortality risk, while those with heart rates >77 bpm and diastolic pressure ≤63 mmHg faced the highest risk. These findings provide valuable insights for risk stratification and may guide personalized management of HFmrEF patients.

References
1.
Savarese G, Lund L . Global Public Health Burden of Heart Failure. Card Fail Rev. 2017; 3(1):7-11. PMC: 5494150. DOI: 10.15420/cfr.2016:25:2. View

2.
Angeli F, Reboldi G, Verdecchia P . Heart failure, pulse pressure and heart rate: Refining risk stratification. Int J Cardiol. 2018; 271:206-208. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.07.072. View

3.
Matsuzawa Y . Is diastolic blood pressure key to detecting risk and preventing heart failure with preserved ejection fraction?. Hypertens Res. 2022; 46(2):534-536. DOI: 10.1038/s41440-022-01105-w. View

4.
Anand I, Rector T, Cleland J, Kuskowski M, McKelvie R, Persson H . Prognostic value of baseline plasma amino-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide and its interactions with irbesartan treatment effects in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: findings from the I-PRESERVE trial. Circ Heart Fail. 2011; 4(5):569-77. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.111.962654. View

5.
Chae C, Pfeffer M, Glynn R, Mitchell G, Taylor J, Hennekens C . Increased pulse pressure and risk of heart failure in the elderly. JAMA. 1999; 281(7):634-9. DOI: 10.1001/jama.281.7.634. View