Complicated Cases in Foreign Bodies of the Ear, Nose, and Throat: a Case Series

Overview

Journal Colomb Med (Cali)

Date 2025 Jan 30

PMID 39881756

Authors

Chonticha Srivanitchapoom

Kedsaraporn Yata

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Managing foreign bodies in otorhinolaryngology requires appropriate treatment based on case severity.

Objective: To analyze the clinical characteristics associated with complicated cases of foreign bodies.

Methods: This study categorized patients with diagnosed foreign bodies into complicated and uncomplicated cases. Complicated cases were defined as complications from foreign bodies requiring an operating room procedure, hospitalization, or tracheal foreign body. Otherwise, they were considered uncomplicated. Clinical data and disease variables were recorded. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to evaluate the significance of different clinical features between the groups (-value <0.05).

Results: Of the 751 cases studied, most cases involving foreign bodies were treated outpatient and typically presented without complications, while 20.1% (n=151) were confirmed as complicated. There were 119 cases present with complications from foreign bodies, 58 requiring removals in an operating room, 57 needing hospitalization, and two tracheal foreign bodies. Multivariate analysis revealed that male gender (-value 0.043, OR (95%CI) = 1.554 (1.015-2.378)), positive presenting symptoms (-value <0.0001, OR (95%CI)= 4.081 (2.299-7.248)), foreign body in the hypopharyngeal area (-value <0.0001, OR (95%CI) = 65.615 (6.907-623.336)), and foreign body in the laryngeal area (-value 0.006, OR (95%CI) = 27.787 (2.568-300.673)) were significantly associated with complicated foreign bodies cases.

Conclusion: Complicated foreign body cases should be addressed in male patients complaining of symptoms and foreign bodies in the hypopharyngeal and laryngotracheal locations. Due to the complexity of their condition, effective management of these patients requires a multidisciplinary approach.

References

Kim K, Chung J, Byun H, Zheng T, Jeong J, Lee S . Clinical Characteristics of External Auditory Canal Foreign Bodies in Children and Adolescents. Ear Nose Throat J. 2019; 99(10):648-653. DOI: 10.1177/0145561319893164. View

Figueiredo R, Azevedo A, Kos A, Tomita S . Complications of ent foreign bodies: a retrospective study. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2008; 74(1):7-15. PMC: 9450582. DOI: 10.1016/s1808-8694(15)30744-8. View

Awad A, ElTaher M . ENT Foreign Bodies: An Experience. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018; 22(2):146-151. PMC: 5882369. DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1603922. View

Yan S, Zeng N, Chen G, Chen Y, Wu Z, Pan H . Presentation and management of nasal foreign bodies in a Chinese metro area. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021; 100(16):e25626. PMC: 8078234. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025626. View

Ngo A, Ng K, Sim T . Otorhinolaryngeal foreign bodies in children presenting to the emergency department. Singapore Med J. 2005; 46(4):172-8. View

von Elm E, Altman D, Egger M, Pocock S, Gotzsche P, Vandenbroucke J . The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int J Surg. 2014; 12(12):1495-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.07.013. View

Mukherjee A, Haldar D, Dutta S, Dutta M, Saha J, Sinha R . Ear, nose and throat foreign bodies in children: a search for socio-demographic correlates. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2011; 75(4):510-2. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2011.01.006. View

Zewdu D, Wondwosen M, Chufamo M, Eanga S, Aga A, Ewnte B . The practice of foreign body removal from the ear, nose, and upper esophageal in children in Ethiopia: A retrospective descriptive study. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2021; 6(6):1316-1320. PMC: 8665465. DOI: 10.1002/lio2.688. View

Lee C, Chen T, Ko J, Yeh T, Hsu W, Kang K . Ear, nose, and throat foreign bodies in adults: A population-based study in Taiwan. J Formos Med Assoc. 2019; 118(9):1290-1298. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfma.2019.05.003. View

10.

Sarkar S, Roychoudhury A, Roychaudhuri B . Foreign bodies in ENT in a teaching hospital in Eastern India. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012; 62(2):118-20. PMC: 3450316. DOI: 10.1007/s12070-010-0040-6. View

11.

Thompson S, Wein R, Dutcher P . External auditory canal foreign body removal: management practices and outcomes. Laryngoscope. 2003; 113(11):1912-5. DOI: 10.1097/00005537-200311000-00010. View

12.

Tiago R, Salgado D, Correa J, Pio M, Lambert E . Foreign body in ear, nose and oropharynx: experience from a tertiary hospital. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2006; 72(2):177-81. PMC: 9445693. DOI: 10.1016/s1808-8694(15)30052-5. View

13.

Oya R, Horii A, Uno A, Kawasaki Y, Inohara H . Foreign bodies in the ear, nose, and throat in Japan: association with sociocultural and geographical conditions. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2018; 46(4):618-623. DOI: 10.1016/j.anl.2018.11.007. View

14.

Sjogren P, Mills T, Pollak A, Muntz H, Meier J, Grimmer J . Predictors of complicated airway foreign body extraction. Laryngoscope. 2017; 128(2):490-495. DOI: 10.1002/lary.26814. View

15.

Heim S, Maughan K . Foreign bodies in the ear, nose, and throat. Am Fam Physician. 2007; 76(8):1185-9. View

16.

Mackle T, Conlon B . Foreign bodies of the nose and ears in children. Should these be managed in the accident and emergency setting?. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2005; 70(3):425-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2005.07.007. View

17.

Karimnejad K, Nelson E, Rohde R, Costa D . External Auditory Canal Foreign Body Extraction Outcomes. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2017; 126(11):755-761. DOI: 10.1177/0003489417731578. View