» Articles » PMID: 39881091

Surgical and Oncological Implications of the Presence of Hepatic Artery Anatomical Variations in Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a Single Center Experience

Overview
Journal Updates Surg
Date 2025 Jan 29
PMID 39881091
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The presence of an aberrant right hepatic artery (a-RHA) could influence the oncological and postoperative outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). A comparative study was conducted, including patients who underwent PD with a-RHA or with normal RHA anatomy. The primary endpoints were R1 resection in all margins (pancreatic, anterior, posterior, superior mesenteric artery, and portal groove), overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS). The secondary endpoints were morbidity, mortality, biliary leak (BL), postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), delayed gastric emptying (DGE), post pancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH), length of stay (LOS), and operative time (OT). The selection bias was measured using the d-value and limited using entropy balancing analysis. Patients with arterial variants were 84 (37.5%), 39 (17.4%) of whom had a-RHA from SMA. The patients with a-RHA were more frequently symptomatic (d = 0.652), often affected by PDAC (d = 0.369), and judged borderline resectable (d = 0.588). Neoadjuvant therapy was more frequently proposed for patients with a-RHA (d = 0.465). The patients with a-RHA often had the Wirsung dilated compared to those without a-RHA (d = 0.336). After bias correction, the R1 resection rate on the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) margin was higher in the a-RHA group than in patients with normal RHA anatomy (OR 2.3; 1.1-5.2; P = 0.045). OS, DFS, morbidity, mortality, biliary leak (BL), postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), delayed gastric emptying (DGE), post pancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH), length of stay (LOS), and operative time (OT) were similar in unmatched and matched population. The presence of a-RHA seems to increase the risk of R1 resection in the SMA margin.

References
1.
Bouassida M, Mighri M, Chtourou M, Sassi S, Touinsi H, Hajji H . Retroportal lamina or mesopancreas? Lessons learned by anatomical and histological study of thirty three cadaveric dissections. Int J Surg. 2013; 11(9):834-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.08.009. View

2.
Lopez-Andujar R, Moya A, Montalva E, Berenguer M, de Juan M, San Juan F . Lessons learned from anatomic variants of the hepatic artery in 1,081 transplanted livers. Liver Transpl. 2007; 13(10):1401-4. DOI: 10.1002/lt.21254. View

3.
Covey A, Brody L, Maluccio M, Getrajdman G, Brown K . Variant hepatic arterial anatomy revisited: digital subtraction angiography performed in 600 patients. Radiology. 2002; 224(2):542-7. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2242011283. View

4.
Choi T, Chung J, Kim H, Lee M, Choi J, Jae H . Anatomic Variations of the Hepatic Artery in 5625 Patients. Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2021; 3(4):e210007. PMC: 8415139. DOI: 10.1148/ryct.2021210007. View

5.
Zaki S, Abdelmaksoud A, Khaled B, Abdel Kader I . Anatomical variations of hepatic artery using the multidetector computed tomography angiography. Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2019; 79(2):247-254. DOI: 10.5603/FM.a2019.0090. View