» Articles » PMID: 39881030

Differences in Body Composition, Bone Density, and Tibial Microarchitecture in Division I Female Athletes Participating in Different Impact Loading Sports

Overview
Date 2025 Jan 29
PMID 39881030
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Sport participation affects body composition and bone health, but the association between sport, body composition, and bone health in female athletes is complex. We compared areal bone mineral density (aBMD, DXA) and tibial volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD), geometry, microarchitecture, and estimated strength (HR-pQCT) in cross-country runners (n = 22), gymnasts (n = 23) and lacrosse players (n = 35), and investigated associations of total body lean mass (TBLM), team, and their interaction with tibial bone outcomes. Total body (TB), total hip (TH), femoral neck (FN), and lumbar spine (LS) aBMD were higher in gymnasts than runners (p < 0.001); FN and LS aBMD were higher in gymnasts than lacrosse players (p ≤ 0.045); and TB, TH, FN, and LS aBMD were higher in lacrosse players than runners (p ≤ 0.013). At the distal tibial metaphysis, total area (Tt.Ar) was higher in gymnasts than runners (p = 0.004); cortical area and thickness (Ct.Ar, Ct.Th) were higher in lacrosse players than runners (p ≤ 0.044); trabecular separation (Tb.Sp) was higher in runners than gymnasts (p = 0.031); and failure load was higher in both gymnasts and lacrosse players than runners (p ≤ 0.012). At the tibial diaphysis, Tt.Ar, Ct.Ar, cortical perimeter (Ct.Pm), and failure load were higher in gymnasts than runners (p ≤ 0.040). In multiple linear regression analyses, TBLM was significantly associated with metaphyseal failure load (ß = 0.30, p = 0.042), and diaphyseal Tt.Ar and Ct.Pm (ß = 6.17, p = 0.003; ß = 0.59, p = 0.010). Bone health can vary among different sport types and is associated with TBLM, which may be a modifiable factor to maintain or improve bone health.

References
1.
Koltun K, Sekel N, Bird M, Lovalekar M, Mi Q, Martin B . Tibial Bone Geometry Is Associated With Bone Stress Injury During Military Training in Men and Women. Front Physiol. 2022; 13:803219. PMC: 8874318. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2022.803219. View

2.
Wade S, Strader C, Fitzpatrick L, Anthony M, OMalley C . Estimating prevalence of osteoporosis: examples from industrialized countries. Arch Osteoporos. 2014; 9:182. DOI: 10.1007/s11657-014-0182-3. View

3.
McCormack W, Shoepe T, LaBrie J, Almstedt H . Bone mineral density, energy availability, and dietary restraint in collegiate cross-country runners and non-running controls. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2019; 119(8):1747-1756. PMC: 10496742. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-019-04164-z. View

4.
Schipilow J, Macdonald H, Liphardt A, Kan M, Boyd S . Bone micro-architecture, estimated bone strength, and the muscle-bone interaction in elite athletes: an HR-pQCT study. Bone. 2013; 56(2):281-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2013.06.014. View

5.
Nikander R, Kannus P, Rantalainen T, Uusi-Rasi K, Heinonen A, Sievanen H . Cross-sectional geometry of weight-bearing tibia in female athletes subjected to different exercise loadings. Osteoporos Int. 2009; 21(10):1687-94. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-009-1101-0. View