» Articles » PMID: 39879156

Utilization of Microalgae and Duckweed As Sustainable Protein Sources for Food and Feed: Nutritional Potential and Functional Applications

Overview
Date 2025 Jan 29
PMID 39879156
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aquatic biomass, particularly microalgae and duckweed, presents a promising and sustainable alternative source of plant-based protein and bioactive compounds for food and feed applications. This review highlights the nutritional potential of these aquatic species, focusing on their high protein content, rapid growth rates, and adaptability to nonarable environments. Microalgae, such as and spp., and duckweed, such as , are evaluated for their functional food applications, including their roles as protein supplements, bioactive components, antioxidants, and emulsifiers in food formulations. The study also examines their environmental benefits, including wastewater bioremediation, nutrient recycling, and greenhouse gas mitigation, which contribute to a more sustainable agricultural system. Technological advancements in the cultivation, harvesting, and processing of microalgae and duckweed are discussed to enhance their scalability and economic feasibility in food and feed production. The findings suggest that integrating microalgae and duckweed into agricultural and food systems can significantly improve food security, nutritional outcomes, and sustainability. Future research should focus on optimizing cultivation efficiencies, advancing protein extraction techniques, and expanding the applications of aquatic biomass in various food products.

References
1.
Li Y, Lammi C, Boschin G, Arnoldi A, Aiello G . Recent Advances in Microalgae Peptides: Cardiovascular Health Benefits and Analysis. J Agric Food Chem. 2019; 67(43):11825-11838. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.9b03566. View

2.
Karitonas R, Jurkoniene S, Sadauskas K, Vaiciuniene J, Manusadzianas L . Modifying effects of leaf litter extracts from invasive versus native tree species on copper-induced responses in . PeerJ. 2020; 8:e9444. PMC: 7350913. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.9444. View

3.
Ansari F, Guldhe A, Gupta S, Rawat I, Bux F . Improving the feasibility of aquaculture feed by using microalgae. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021; 28(32):43234-43257. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-14989-x. View

4.
Flores-Rojas N, Esterhuizen-Londt M, Pflugmacher S . Uptake, Growth, and Pigment Changes in L. Exposed to Environmental Concentrations of Cylindrospermopsin. Toxins (Basel). 2019; 11(11). PMC: 6891409. DOI: 10.3390/toxins11110650. View

5.
Raja R, Hemaiswarya S, Kumar N, Sridhar S, Rengasamy R . A perspective on the biotechnological potential of microalgae. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2008; 34(2):77-88. DOI: 10.1080/10408410802086783. View