Evaluation of the Genotoxic and Transformation Potential Induced by Asbestos Compared to Cleavage Fragments

Overview

Journal Sci Rep

Date 2025 Jan 28

PMID 39875416

Authors

Sebastiano La Maestra

Gaia M Militello

Stefano Alberti

Mirko Benvenuti

Laura Gaggero

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The World Health Organization has confirmed that asbestos fibres are carcinogenic, claiming that asbestos-related diseases should be eradicated worldwide. Actinolite, amosite, anthophyllite, chrysotile, crocidolite, and tremolite are regulated asbestiform mineral phases. However, in nature, asbestos minerals occur either in a fibrous and asbestiform (original morphology characterized by high length-to-width ratio and provided of high tensile strength and flexibility) or fibrous but not asbestiform appearance. This study used human epithelial cancer cells (A549) and a mouse fibroblast cell line (Balb/c 3T3) to compare the genotoxic and carcinogenic effects of a sample of amphibole asbestos with samples of fibrous not asbestiform named cleavage fragments (CV) obtained by grinding non-asbestiform amphiboles. The results showed that exposure of alveolar lung cells to asbestos and elongated mineral particles, in the habit of cleavage fragments (CF) derived from the grinding of non-asbestiform amphiboles and serpentines, causes cytotoxic effects, oxidative stress and genotoxic damage. Moreover, CF obtained from an actinolite schist induces a transformation effect in the Balb/c 3T3 model. Together, these findings highlight the importance of considering CF as a potential threat to human health since it can cause genotoxic damage by triggering cellular transformation processes that overlap with the mechanisms involved in the carcinogenesis processes of asbestos.

References

Gao X, Schottker B . Reduction-oxidation pathways involved in cancer development: a systematic review of literature reviews. Oncotarget. 2017; 8(31):51888-51906. PMC: 5584299. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.17128. View

Kuroda A . Recent progress and perspectives on the mechanisms underlying Asbestos toxicity. Genes Environ. 2021; 43(1):46. PMC: 8507173. DOI: 10.1186/s41021-021-00215-0. View

La Maestra S, Micale R, Ferretti M, Izzotti A, Gaggero L . Attenuation of oxidative stress and chromosomal aberrations in cultured macrophages and pulmonary cells following self-sustained high temperature synthesis of asbestos. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):8581. PMC: 7244567. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-65620-x. View

Hayashi K, Sasaki K, Asada S, Tsuchiya T, Hayashi M, Yoshimura I . Technical modification of the Balb/c 3T3 cell transformation assay: the use of serum-reduced medium to optimise the practicability of the protocol. Altern Lab Anim. 2009; 36(6):653-65. DOI: 10.1177/026119290803600609. View

Pollastri S, Gualtieri A, Gualtieri M, Hanuskova M, Cavallo A, Gaudino G . The zeta potential of mineral fibres. J Hazard Mater. 2014; 276:469-79. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.05.060. View

Chew S, Toyokuni S . Malignant mesothelioma as an oxidative stress-induced cancer: An update. Free Radic Biol Med. 2015; 86:166-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2015.05.002. View

Aguilar-Cazares D, Chavez-Dominguez R, Carlos-Reyes A, Lopez-Camarillo C, Hernadez de la Cruz O, Lopez-Gonzalez J . Contribution of Angiogenesis to Inflammation and Cancer. Front Oncol. 2020; 9:1399. PMC: 6920210. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01399. View

Huang S, Jaurand M, Kamp D, Whysner J, Hei T . Role of mutagenicity in asbestos fiber-induced carcinogenicity and other diseases. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2011; 14(1-4):179-245. PMC: 3118525. DOI: 10.1080/10937404.2011.556051. View

Keane M, Stephens J, Zhong B, Miller W, Ong T, Wallace W . A study of the effect of chrysotile fiber surface composition on genotoxicity in vitro. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 1999; 57(8):529-41. DOI: 10.1080/009841099157494. View

10.

Kamp D, Graceffa P, Pryor W, Weitzman S . The role of free radicals in asbestos-induced diseases. Free Radic Biol Med. 1992; 12(4):293-315. DOI: 10.1016/0891-5849(92)90117-y. View

11.

Aust A, Cook P, Dodson R . Morphological and chemical mechanisms of elongated mineral particle toxicities. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2011; 14(1-4):40-75. PMC: 3118489. DOI: 10.1080/10937404.2011.556046. View

12.

Goodman J, Becich M, Bernstein D, Case B, Mandel J, Nel A . Non-asbestiform elongate mineral particles and mesothelioma risk: Human and experimental evidence. Environ Res. 2023; 230:114578. PMC: 11225580. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.114578. View

13.

Gualtieri A, Andreozzi G, Tomatis M, Turci F . Iron from a geochemical viewpoint. Understanding toxicity/pathogenicity mechanisms in iron-bearing minerals with a special attention to mineral fibers. Free Radic Biol Med. 2018; 133:21-37. DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2018.07.023. View

14.

Wylie A, Korchevskiy A, Segrave A, Duane A . Modeling mesothelioma risk factors from amphibole fiber dimensionality: mineralogical and epidemiological perspective. J Appl Toxicol. 2020; 40(4):515-524. DOI: 10.1002/jat.3923. View

15.

Kim H, Morimoto Y, Tsuda T, Ootsuyama Y, Hirohashi M, Hirano T . Changes in DNA 8-hydroxyguanine levels, 8-hydroxyguanine repair activity, and hOGG1 and hMTH1 mRNA expression in human lung alveolar epithelial cells induced by crocidolite asbestos. Carcinogenesis. 2001; 22(2):265-9. DOI: 10.1093/carcin/22.2.265. View

16.

Walker C, Everitt J, Barrett J . Possible cellular and molecular mechanisms for asbestos carcinogenicity. Am J Ind Med. 1992; 21(2):253-73. DOI: 10.1002/ajim.4700210214. View

17.

Upadhyay D, Kamp D . Asbestos-induced pulmonary toxicity: role of DNA damage and apoptosis. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2003; 228(6):650-9. DOI: 10.1177/153537020322800602. View