Impact of Changes in Primary Care Attachment: a Scoping Review

Overview

Journal Fam Med Community Health

Date 2025 Jan 28

PMID 39875177

Authors

Leanda Godfrey

Antoine St-Amant

Kamila Premji

Jonathan Fitzsimon

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objectives: Primary care attachment represents an inclusive, equitable and cost-effective way of enhancing health outcomes globally. However, the growing shortage of family physicians threatens to disrupt patient-provider relationships. Understanding the consequences of these disruptions is essential for guiding future research and policy. The objectives of this study were to map the existing evidence on the impacts of changes in primary care attachment, identify research gaps and recommend areas for further investigation.

Design: Scoping review following Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidelines and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. Two researchers conducted all stages of screening, and study quality was assessed using JBI critical appraisal tools. Key themes included causes of attachment change, direction of change and outcomes aligned with the quintuple aim framework. Both qualitative and quantitative findings were synthesised narratively.

Eligibility Criteria: Peer-reviewed, English-language articles published between 1999 and 2024 on primary care attachment changes.

Information Sources: PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science.

Results: Of 2045 studies screened, 31 met inclusion criteria, with 60% published after 2020. Most studies originated from high-income countries, particularly the USA (35%) and Canada (29%). Attachment losses and transfers were the most frequently studied, while attachment and unattachment durations were less explored. These changes in attachment were consistently shown to impact patients, providers, clinics and the healthcare system, influencing all aims of the quintuple aim framework, including clinical outcomes, healthcare utilisation, costs, equity and patient experience. Commonly assessed outcomes included clinical impact (68%), health equity (48%), patient experience (32%) and costs (23%), with no study assessing provider experience.

Conclusions: This scoping review maps the published literature on changes in primary care attachment and introduces clarifying terminology. Key research gaps include geographical diversity (lack of studies from low- and middle-income countries), attachment gain (limited research on strategies to reconnect unattached patients), attachment duration (insufficient evidence on long-term health outcomes), economic implications (underexplored costs of physician turnover and disruption), provider experiences (lack of studies on how changes in primary care attachment impact provider burnout, job satisfaction and workload) and patient health outcomes (focus on healthcare utilisation rather than direct health outcomes). These findings underscore the need for further research and offer valuable insights for future studies and policy development.

References

Jabaaij L, de Bakker D, Schers H, Bindels P, Dekker J, Schellevis F . Recently enlisted patients in general practice use more health care resources. BMC Fam Pract. 2007; 8:64. PMC: 2235863. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-8-64. View

Terpou B, Lapointe-Shaw L, Wang R, Martin D, Tadrous M, Bhatia S . A shifting terrain: Understanding the perspectives of walk-in physicians on their roles amid worsening primary care access in Ontario, Canada. PLoS One. 2024; 19(5):e0303107. PMC: 11095764. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303107. View

Marshall E, Wuite S, Lawson B, Andrew M, Edwards L, MacKenzie A . "What do you mean I can't have a doctor? this is Canada!" - a qualitative study of the myriad consequences for unattached patients awaiting primary care attachment. BMC Prim Care. 2022; 23(1):60. PMC: 8966849. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-022-01671-5. View

Fadlon I, Van Parys J . Primary care physician practice styles and patient care: Evidence from physician exits in Medicare. J Health Econ. 2020; 71:102304. PMC: 7263170. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2020.102304. View

Pereira A, Kleinman K, Pearson S . Leaving the practice: effects of primary care physician departure on patient care. Arch Intern Med. 2003; 163(22):2733-6. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.163.22.2733. View

Sandvik H, Hetlevik O, Blinkenberg J, Hunskaar S . Continuity in general practice as predictor of mortality, acute hospitalisation, and use of out-of-hours care: a registry-based observational study in Norway. Br J Gen Pract. 2021; 72(715):e84-e90. PMC: 8510690. DOI: 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0340. View

Simonsen M, Skipper L, Skipper N, Thingholm P . Discontinuity in care: Practice closures among primary care providers and patient health care utilization. J Health Econ. 2021; 80:102551. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2021.102551. View

Plomondon M, Magid D, Steiner J, MaWhinney S, Gifford B, Shih S . Primary care provider turnover and quality in managed care organizations. Am J Manag Care. 2007; 13(8):465-72. View

Freeman T, Brown J, Reid G, Stewart M, Thind A, Vingilis E . Patients' perceptions on losing access to FPs: qualitative study. Can Fam Physician. 2013; 59(4):e195-201. PMC: 3625102. View

10.

Salahub C, Austin P, Bai L, Berthelot S, Bhatia R, Bird C . Health Care Utilization After a Visit to a Within-Group Family Physician vs a Walk-In Clinic Physician. Ann Fam Med. 2024; 22(6):483-491. PMC: 11588379. DOI: 10.1370/afm.3181. View

11.

Peters M, Marnie C, Tricco A, Pollock D, Munn Z, Alexander L . Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid Synth. 2020; 18(10):2119-2126. DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00167. View

12.

Ruhe M, Gotler R, Goodwin M, Stange K . Physician and staff turnover in community primary care practice. J Ambul Care Manage. 2004; 27(3):242-8. DOI: 10.1097/00004479-200407000-00008. View

13.

Sawicki O, Mueller A, Klaassen-Mielke R, Glushan A, Gerlach F, Beyer M . Strong and sustainable primary healthcare is associated with a lower risk of hospitalization in high risk patients. Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):4349. PMC: 7902818. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-83962-y. View

14.

Smithman M, Haggerty J, Gaboury I, Breton M . Improved access to and continuity of primary care after attachment to a family physician: longitudinal cohort study on centralized waiting lists for unattached patients in Quebec, Canada. BMC Prim Care. 2022; 23(1):238. PMC: 9482231. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-022-01850-4. View

15.

Arya N, Gibson C, Ponka D, Haq C, Hansel S, Dahlman B . Family medicine around the world: overview by region: The Besrour Papers: a series on the state of family medicine in the world. Can Fam Physician. 2017; 63(6):436-441. PMC: 5471080. View

16.

Breton M, Smithman M, Touati N, Boivin A, Loignon C, Dubois C . Family Physicians Attaching New Patients From Centralized Waiting Lists: A Cross-Sectional Study. J Prim Care Community Health. 2018; 9:2150132718795943. PMC: 6104207. DOI: 10.1177/2150132718795943. View

17.

Parisi R, Lau Y, Bower P, Checkland K, Rubery J, Sutton M . Predictors and population health outcomes of persistent high GP turnover in English general practices: a retrospective observational study. BMJ Qual Saf. 2023; 32(7):394-403. PMC: 10313950. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2022-015353. View

18.

Nundy S, Cooper L, Mate K . The Quintuple Aim for Health Care Improvement: A New Imperative to Advance Health Equity. JAMA. 2022; 327(6):521-522. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2021.25181. View

19.

Golan-Cohen A, Blumberg G, Merzon E, Kitai E, Fogelman Y, Shipotovsky A . Does a policy that requires adherence to a regular primary care physician improve the actual adherence of patients?. Isr J Health Policy Res. 2021; 10(1):50. PMC: 8386125. DOI: 10.1186/s13584-021-00475-9. View

20.

Bischof T, Kaiser B . Who cares when you close down? The effects of primary care practice closures on patients. Health Econ. 2021; 30(9):2004-2025. DOI: 10.1002/hec.4287. View