A Network-enabled Pipeline for Gene Discovery and Validation in Non-model Plant Species

Overview

Journal Cell Rep Methods

Date 2025 Jan 28

PMID 39874949

Authors

Dae Kwan Ko

Federica Brandizzi

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Identifying key regulators of important genes in non-model crop species is challenging due to limited multi-omics resources. To address this, we introduce the network-enabled gene discovery pipeline NEEDLE, a user-friendly tool that systematically generates coexpression gene network modules, measures gene connectivity, and establishes network hierarchy to pinpoint key transcriptional regulators from dynamic transcriptome datasets. After validating its accuracy with two independent datasets, we applied NEEDLE to identify transcription factors (TFs) regulating the expression of cellulose synthase-like F6 (CSLF6), a crucial cell wall biosynthetic gene, in Brachypodium and sorghum. Our analyses uncover regulators of CSLF6 and also shed light on the evolutionary conservation or divergence of gene regulatory elements among grass species. These results highlight NEEDLE's capability to provide biologically relevant TF predictions and demonstrate its value for non-model plant species with dynamic transcriptome datasets.

References

Wittkopp P, Kalay G . Cis-regulatory elements: molecular mechanisms and evolutionary processes underlying divergence. Nat Rev Genet. 2011; 13(1):59-69. DOI: 10.1038/nrg3095. View

Huynh-Thu V, Sanguinetti G . Tree-Based Learning of Regulatory Network Topologies and Dynamics with Jump3. Methods Mol Biol. 2018; 1883:217-233. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-8882-2_9. View

Alvarez J, Brooks M, Swift J, Coruzzi G . Time-Based Systems Biology Approaches to Capture and Model Dynamic Gene Regulatory Networks. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2021; 72:105-131. PMC: 9312366. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-081320-090914. View

Fan M, Herburger K, Jensen J, Zemelis-Durfee S, Brandizzi F, Fry S . A Trihelix Family Transcription Factor Is Associated with Key Genes in Mixed-Linkage Glucan Accumulation. Plant Physiol. 2018; 178(3):1207-1221. PMC: 6236600. DOI: 10.1104/pp.18.00978. View

Girin T, David L, Chardin C, Sibout R, Krapp A, Ferrario-Mery S . Brachypodium: a promising hub between model species and cereals. J Exp Bot. 2014; 65(19):5683-96. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/eru376. View

Cassan O, Lebre S, Martin A . Inferring and analyzing gene regulatory networks from multi-factorial expression data: a complete and interactive suite. BMC Genomics. 2021; 22(1):387. PMC: 8152307. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-021-07659-2. View

Anders S, Pyl P, Huber W . HTSeq--a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2014; 31(2):166-9. PMC: 4287950. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638. View

Li Y, Pearl S, Jackson S . Gene Networks in Plant Biology: Approaches in Reconstruction and Analysis. Trends Plant Sci. 2015; 20(10):664-675. DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2015.06.013. View

Frazer K, Pachter L, Poliakov A, Rubin E, Dubchak I . VISTA: computational tools for comparative genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004; 32(Web Server issue):W273-9. PMC: 441596. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkh458. View

10.

Ko D, Brandizzi F . Advanced genomics identifies growth effectors for proteotoxic ER stress recovery in Arabidopsis thaliana. Commun Biol. 2022; 5(1):16. PMC: 8752741. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-021-02964-8. View

11.

Pauly M, Keegstra K . Cell-wall carbohydrates and their modification as a resource for biofuels. Plant J. 2008; 54(4):559-68. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03463.x. View

12.

Wu T, Hu E, Xu S, Chen M, Guo P, Dai Z . clusterProfiler 4.0: A universal enrichment tool for interpreting omics data. Innovation (Camb). 2021; 2(3):100141. PMC: 8454663. DOI: 10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100141. View

13.

Kim S, Brandizzi F . Advances in Cell Wall Matrix Research with a Focus on Mixed-Linkage Glucan. Plant Cell Physiol. 2021; 62(12):1839-1846. DOI: 10.1093/pcp/pcab106. View

14.

Zhu J . Abiotic Stress Signaling and Responses in Plants. Cell. 2016; 167(2):313-324. PMC: 5104190. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.029. View

15.

Tian F, Yang D, Meng Y, Jin J, Gao G . PlantRegMap: charting functional regulatory maps in plants. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; 48(D1):D1104-D1113. PMC: 7145545. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkz1020. View

16.

Rosin F, Kramer E . Old dogs, new tricks: regulatory evolution in conserved genetic modules leads to novel morphologies in plants. Dev Biol. 2009; 332(1):25-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.05.542. View

17.

Srivastava R, Li Z, Russo G, Tang J, Bi R, Muppirala U . Response to Persistent ER Stress in Plants: A Multiphasic Process That Transitions Cells from Prosurvival Activities to Cell Death. Plant Cell. 2018; 30(6):1220-1242. PMC: 6048783. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.18.00153. View

18.

McSteen P, Kellogg E . Molecular, cellular, and developmental foundations of grass diversity. Science. 2022; 377(6606):599-602. DOI: 10.1126/science.abo5035. View

19.

Kim P, Xue C, Song H, Gao Y, Feng L, Li Y . Tissue-specific activation of DOF11 promotes rice resistance to sheath blight disease and increases grain weight via activation of SWEET14. Plant Biotechnol J. 2020; 19(3):409-411. PMC: 7955873. DOI: 10.1111/pbi.13489. View

20.

Ko D, Brandizzi F . Coexpression Network Construction and Visualization from Transcriptomes Underlying ER Stress Responses. Methods Mol Biol. 2022; 2581:385-401. PMC: 10500560. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-2784-6_27. View