Admitting to Bullying Others or Denying It: Differences in Children's Psychosocial Adjustment and Implications for Intervention

Overview

Journal Int J Behav Dev

Publisher Sage Publications

Date 2025 Jan 28

PMID 39872166

Authors

Claire F Garandeau

Tiina Turunen

Jessica Trach

Christina Salmivalli

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

This study examined whether, for bullying perpetrators, admitting to their behavior was associated with specific psychosocial characteristics, and whether it predicted decreases in bullying behavior and a higher responsiveness to a successful anti-bullying program after 9 months of implementation. It also investigated whether participation in an anti-bullying program deterred admitting to the behavior. At pretest, our sample included 5,908 children and early adolescents ( : 11.2 years) in 39 intervention and 38 control schools; among them, 1,304 were peer-identified bullying perpetrators (scoring higher or equal to 0.5 above the same-sex classroom mean). Regression analyses indicated that peer-identified bullying perpetrators who admitted to their behavior were more likely to suffer from internalizing problems and reported lower anti-bullying attitudes than those who did not admit to bullying others. There was no significant main effect of admitting to bullying on changes in peer-reported bullying 1 year later. However, in control schools only, those who admitted to bullying at pretest were more likely to continue bullying a year later than those who denied it. There was no evidence that participating in the anti-bullying program made it less likely for peer-identified bullying perpetrators to admit to their behavior.

References

Salmon G, James A, Smith D . Bullying in schools: self reported anxiety, depression, and self esteem in secondary school children. BMJ. 1998; 317(7163):924-5. PMC: 28678. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.317.7163.924. View

Scholte R, Engels R, Overbeek G, de Kemp R, Haselager G . Stability in bullying and victimization and its association with social adjustment in childhood and adolescence. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2007; 35(2):217-28. PMC: 1915632. DOI: 10.1007/s10802-006-9074-3. View

Seals D, Young J . Bullying and victimization: prevalence and relationship to gender, grade level, ethnicity, self-esteem, and depression. Adolescence. 2004; 38(152):735-47. View

Bouman T, van der Meulen M, Goossens F, Olthof T, Vermande M, Aleva E . Peer and self-reports of victimization and bullying: their differential association with internalizing problems and social adjustment. J Sch Psychol. 2012; 50(6):759-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsp.2012.08.004. View

Juvonen J, Graham S, Schuster M . Bullying among young adolescents: the strong, the weak, and the troubled. Pediatrics. 2003; 112(6 Pt 1):1231-7. DOI: 10.1542/peds.112.6.1231. View

Killer B, Bussey K, Hawes D, Hunt C . A meta-analysis of the relationship between moral disengagement and bullying roles in youth. Aggress Behav. 2019; 45(4):450-462. DOI: 10.1002/ab.21833. View

Taylor S, Lerner J, Sherman D, Sage R, McDowell N . Portrait of the self-enhancer: well adjusted and well liked or maladjusted and friendless?. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003; 84(1):165-76. View

Kaltiala-Heino R, Rimpela M, Rantanen P, Rimpela A . Bullying at school--an indicator of adolescents at risk for mental disorders. J Adolesc. 2001; 23(6):661-74. DOI: 10.1006/jado.2000.0351. View

Gaffney H, Ttofi M, Farrington D . Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying perpetration and victimization: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Campbell Syst Rev. 2023; 17(2):e1143. PMC: 8356322. DOI: 10.1002/cl2.1143. View

10.

Peeters M, Cillessen A, Scholte R . Clueless or powerful? Identifying subtypes of bullies in adolescence. J Youth Adolesc. 2010; 39(9):1041-52. DOI: 10.1007/s10964-009-9478-9. View

11.

Azevedo Da Silva M, Gonzalez J, Person G, Martins S . Bidirectional Association Between Bullying Perpetration and Internalizing Problems Among Youth. J Adolesc Health. 2019; 66(3):315-322. PMC: 7285807. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.09.022. View

12.

Paulhus D . Interpersonal and intrapsychic adaptiveness of trait self-enhancement: a mixed blessing?. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998; 74(5):1197-208. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.74.5.1197. View

13.

Holtgraves T . Social desirability and self-reports: testing models of socially desirable responding. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2004; 30(2):161-72. DOI: 10.1177/0146167203259930. View

14.

Klomek A, Marrocco F, Kleinman M, Schonfeld I, Gould M . Bullying, depression, and suicidality in adolescents. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2007; 46(1):40-49. DOI: 10.1097/01.chi.0000242237.84925.18. View

15.

Karna A, Voeten M, Little T, Poskiparta E, Kaljonen A, Salmivalli C . A large-scale evaluation of the KiVa antibullying program: grades 4-6. Child Dev. 2011; 82(1):311-30. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01557.x. View

16.

Rigby K, Slee P . Bullying among Australian school children: reported behavior and attitudes toward victims. J Soc Psychol. 1991; 131(5):615-27. DOI: 10.1080/00224545.1991.9924646. View

17.

Chu X, Fan C, Liu Q, Zhou Z . Stability and Change of Bullying Roles in the Traditional and Virtual Contexts: A Three-Wave Longitudinal Study in Chinese Early Adolescents. J Youth Adolesc. 2018; 47(11):2384-2400. DOI: 10.1007/s10964-018-0908-4. View

18.

Johander E, Trach J, Turunen T, Garandeau C, Salmivalli C . Intention to Stop Bullying following a Condemning, Empathy-Raising, or Combined Message from a Teacher - Do Students' Empathy and Callous-Unemotional Traits Matter?. J Youth Adolesc. 2022; 51(8):1568-1580. PMC: 9013243. DOI: 10.1007/s10964-022-01613-5. View

19.

Schwartz D . Subtypes of victims and aggressors in children's peer groups. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2000; 28(2):181-92. DOI: 10.1023/a:1005174831561. View

20.

Hensums M, de Mooij B, Kuijper S, Fekkes M, Overbeek G . What Works for Whom in School-Based Anti-bullying Interventions? An Individual Participant Data Meta-analysis. Prev Sci. 2022; 24(8):1435-1446. PMC: 10678813. DOI: 10.1007/s11121-022-01387-z. View