» Articles » PMID: 39872015

Safety and Immunogenicity of a Modified COVID-19 MRNA Vaccine, SYS6006, As a Fourth-dose Booster Following Three Doses of Inactivated Vaccines in Healthy Adults: an Open-labeled Phase 1 Trial

Overview
Journal Life Metab
Date 2025 Jan 28
PMID 39872015
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The continuous emergence of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants led to a rapid decline in protection efficacy and neutralizing titers even after three doses of COVID-19 vaccines. Here, we report an open-labeled Phase I clinical trial of a modified mRNA vaccine (SYS6006) as a fourth-dose booster in healthy adults. Eighteen eligible participants, who had completed three doses of inactivated COVID-19 vaccines, received a fourth boosting dose of SYS6006-20 μg. Eighteen convalescent COVID-19 patients were enrolled for the collection of serum samples as a comparator of immunogenicity. The primary endpoint of this trial was titers of anti-receptor binding domain of spike glycoprotein (RBD) antibodies of the Omicron strain (BA.2 and BA.4/5) in serum; titers of neutralizing antibodies against pseudovirus of the Omicron strain (BA.2 and BA.4/5). The secondary endpoint was the incidence of adverse events within 30 days after the boosting. The exploratory endpoint was the cellular immune responses (interferon gamma, IFN-γ). This trial was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry website. No serious adverse events were reported within 30 days after vaccination. No Grade 3 fever or serious adverse event was reported in the SYS6006 group. Notably, SYS6006 elicited higher titers and longer increases in anti-RBD antibodies and neutralizing antibodies (>90 days) compared with the convalescent group ( < 0.0001) against Omicron strain (BA.2 and BA.4/5). Besides, higher positive spots of T-cell-secreting IFN-γ were observed in the SYS6006 group than those in the convalescent group ( < 0.05). These data demonstrated that SYS6006 was well tolerated and highly immunogenic, generating a stronger and more durable immune response against different variants of SARS-CoV-2.

References
1.
Tabarsi P, Anjidani N, Shahpari R, Mardani M, Sabzvari A, Yazdani B . Safety and immunogenicity of SpikoGen®, an Advax-CpG55.2-adjuvanted SARS-CoV-2 spike protein vaccine: a phase 2 randomized placebo-controlled trial in both seropositive and seronegative populations. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2022; 28(9):1263-1271. PMC: 9012510. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2022.04.004. View

2.
Folegatti P, Ewer K, Aley P, Angus B, Becker S, Belij-Rammerstorfer S . Safety and immunogenicity of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2: a preliminary report of a phase 1/2, single-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2020; 396(10249):467-478. PMC: 7445431. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31604-4. View

3.
Mallapaty S . China's COVID vaccines have been crucial - now immunity is waning. Nature. 2021; 598(7881):398-399. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-021-02796-w. View

4.
Kremsner P, Ahuad Guerrero R, Arana-Arri E, Aroca Martinez G, Bonten M, Chandler R . Efficacy and safety of the CVnCoV SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine candidate in ten countries in Europe and Latin America (HERALD): a randomised, observer-blinded, placebo-controlled, phase 2b/3 trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021; 22(3):329-340. PMC: 8610426. DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00677-0. View

5.
DeGrace M, Ghedin E, Frieman M, Krammer F, Grifoni A, Alisoltani A . Defining the risk of SARS-CoV-2 variants on immune protection. Nature. 2022; 605(7911):640-652. PMC: 9345323. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-04690-5. View