» Articles » PMID: 39871306

The Quest for Environmental Analytical Microbiology: Absolute Quantitative Microbiome Using Cellular Internal Standards

Overview
Journal Microbiome
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2025 Jan 28
PMID 39871306
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: High-throughput sequencing has revolutionized environmental microbiome research, providing both quantitative and qualitative insights into nucleic acid targets in the environment. The resulting microbial composition (community structure) data are essential for environmental analytical microbiology, enabling characterization of community dynamics and assessing microbial pollutants for the development of intervention strategies. However, the relative abundances derived from sequencing impede comparisons across samples and studies.

Results: This review systematically summarizes various absolute quantification (AQ) methods and their applications to obtain the absolute abundance of microbial cells and genetic elements. By critically comparing the strengths and limitations of AQ methods, we advocate the use of cellular internal standard-based high-throughput sequencing as an appropriate AQ approach for studying environmental microbiome originated from samples of complex matrices and high heterogeneity. To minimize ambiguity and facilitate cross-study comparisons, we outline essential reporting elements for technical considerations, and provide a checklist as a reference for environmental microbiome research.

Conclusions: In summary, we propose absolute microbiome quantification using cellular internal standards for environmental analytical microbiology, and we anticipate that this approach will greatly benefit future studies. Video Abstract.

References
1.
Thauer R, Kaster A, Seedorf H, Buckel W, Hedderich R . Methanogenic archaea: ecologically relevant differences in energy conservation. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2008; 6(8):579-91. DOI: 10.1038/nrmicro1931. View

2.
Yang Y, Deng Y, Shi X, Liu L, Yin X, Zhao W . QMRA of beach water by Nanopore sequencing-based viability-metagenomics absolute quantification. Water Res. 2023; 235:119858. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2023.119858. View

3.
Hawinkel S, Mattiello F, Bijnens L, Thas O . A broken promise: microbiome differential abundance methods do not control the false discovery rate. Brief Bioinform. 2017; 20(1):210-221. DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbx104. View

4.
Wallner G, Erhart R, Amann R . Flow cytometric analysis of activated sludge with rRNA-targeted probes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995; 61(5):1859-66. PMC: 167448. DOI: 10.1128/aem.61.5.1859-1866.1995. View

5.
Brooks J, Edwards D, Harwich Jr M, Rivera M, Fettweis J, Serrano M . The truth about metagenomics: quantifying and counteracting bias in 16S rRNA studies. BMC Microbiol. 2015; 15:66. PMC: 4433096. DOI: 10.1186/s12866-015-0351-6. View