» Articles » PMID: 39870984

Age-threshold for Increased Risk of Developing Back Disorders: Prospective Cohort with 74 000 Individuals from the UK Biobank

Overview
Journal Eur Spine J
Date 2025 Jan 27
PMID 39870984
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To investigate the prospective associations between age and the risk of low back disorders (LBD), dorsal disorders (DD), and cervical disorders (CD), and to identify a potential age-threshold for increased risk of back disorders.

Methods: Prospective cohort from the UK Biobank comprising adults with no history of back disorders. We examined different ages and their association with the risk of back disorders derived from diagnoses of hospital registers. Associations were investigated using restricted cubic splines adjusted for sex, racial and ethnic background, tobacco use, Townsend Deprivation Index, alcohol consumption, educational attainment, employment status, self-reported health, diet quality, body mass index, medication use, physical activity, and handgrip strength.

Results: The analytic sample comprised 74,191 participants (mean [SD] age, 55.2 [7.8] years; 57%women) who were followed-up for 7.9 years (IQR = 7.3-8.4). Overall, 3297 (4.3%) cases of incident LBD, 1224 (1.6%) cases of DD, and 792 (1.0%) of CD were documented. The association between age and LBD showed a curvilinear shape with significant higher risk within the range of 61 (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.39 [95%CI,1.02-1.49]) and 70 (HR = 1.71 [95%CI,1.38-2.12]) years (reference:40 years). Similarly, the association of age with DD exhibited a significant curvilinear association within the range of 60 (HR = 1.31 [95%CI,1.01-1.92]) and 70 (HR = 2.74 [95%CI,1.94-3.86]) years. The association between age and CD was not significant.

Conclusions: The risk of LBD and DD, but not CD, increases beyond 60 years of age. Targeting people at this critical age-threshold to prevent risk for LBD and DD may be warranted for future interventions and preventive health programmes.

References
1.
Briggs A, Smith A, Straker L, Bragge P . Thoracic spine pain in the general population: prevalence, incidence and associated factors in children, adolescents and adults. A systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009; 10:77. PMC: 2720379. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-10-77. View

2.
Burdorf A, Sorock G . Positive and negative evidence of risk factors for back disorders. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1997; 23(4):243-56. DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.217. View

3.
Astrand N . Medical, psychological, and social factors associated with back abnormalities and self reported back pain: a cross sectional study of male employees in a Swedish pulp and paper industry. Br J Ind Med. 1987; 44(5):327-36. PMC: 1007830. DOI: 10.1136/oem.44.5.327. View

4.
Littlejohns T, Sudlow C, Allen N, Collins R . UK Biobank: opportunities for cardiovascular research. Eur Heart J. 2017; 40(14):1158-1166. PMC: 6451771. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx254. View

5.
Lotters F, Burdorf A, Kuiper J, Miedema H . Model for the work-relatedness of low-back pain. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2004; 29(6):431-40. DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.749. View