» Articles » PMID: 39870821

Does a Gentamicin-coated Intramedullary Nail Prevent Postoperative Infection in Gustilo Type I and II Tibial Open Fractures? A Comparative Study and Retrospective Analysis

Overview
Date 2025 Jan 27
PMID 39870821
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Tibial open shaft fractures are very common and susceptible to infection, which can lead to significant morbidity especially infection and non-union. Antibiotic coated nail is one option for fixing open shaft tibial fractures to minimise infection. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcome of Gentamicin-coated tibial nails versus regular unreamed interlocking tibial nails in the treatment of type I and II tibial open fractures.

Methods: Between 2013 and 2020, in a retrospective study of 124 patients with Gustilo type I and II tibial fractures compared non-antibiotic-coated nails (62 patients) with gentamicin-coated nails (62 patients) over 12 months. This study assessed infection rates, duration of hospital stays, fracture union time, and complications.

Results: The antibiotic nail group had significantly lower postoperative infection rates (3.2%) than the regular nail group (17.7%), (χ2 = 4.64, p = 0.031). At the 6-month follow-up, significant differences were observed in ESR (p = 0.031), CRP (p = 0.019), leukocyte count (p = 0.0241), and blood culture (p = 0.018), but not in hemoglobin levels (p = 0.067). The Gentamicin-coated nail group demonstrated better fracture union rates at 6 and 12 months, (p = 0.0267) and lower overall complication rates.

Conclusion: A tibial nail coated with Gentamicin is an effective method for preventing infection in type I and II open fracture shafts of the tibia. It allows, shortens hospital stay and healing time, prevents infection, and thus reduces the chance of a second surgery.

Level Of Evidence: Level III, a retrospective study.

Design: Retrospective analytical study.

Hypothesis: We hypothesized that Gentamicin-coated nail is effective in preventing infection in Gustilo type I and II open fractures compared to non-antibiotic-coated regular nails.

References
1.
Wennergren D, Bergdahl C, Ekelund J, Juto H, Sundfeldt M, Moller M . Epidemiology and incidence of tibia fractures in the Swedish Fracture Register. Injury. 2018; 49(11):2068-2074. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.09.008. View

2.
Miller N, Askew A . Tibia fractures. An overview of evaluation and treatment. Orthop Nurs. 2007; 26(4):216-23. DOI: 10.1097/01.NOR.0000284648.52968.27. View

3.
Hofmann A, Dietz S, Pairon P, Rommens P . The role of intramedullary nailing in treatment of open fractures. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2015; 41(1):39-47. DOI: 10.1007/s00068-014-0485-5. View

4.
Fuchs T, Stange R, Schmidmaier G, Raschke M . The use of gentamicin-coated nails in the tibia: preliminary results of a prospective study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011; 131(10):1419-25. PMC: 3175046. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-011-1321-6. View

5.
Metsemakers W, Reul M, Nijs S . The use of gentamicin-coated nails in complex open tibia fracture and revision cases: A retrospective analysis of a single centre case series and review of the literature. Injury. 2015; 46(12):2433-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.09.028. View