» Articles » PMID: 39868166

Cell Cycle-dependent Cues Regulate Temporal Patterning of the Central Brain Neural Stem Cells

Overview
Journal bioRxiv
Date 2025 Jan 27
PMID 39868166
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

During nervous system development, diverse types of neurons and glia are sequentially generated by self-renewing neural stem cells (NSCs). Temporal changes in gene expression within NSCs are thought to regulate neural diversity; however, the mechanisms regulating the timing of these temporal gene transitions remain poorly understood. type II NSCs, like human outer radial glia, divide to self-renew and generate intermediate neural progenitors, amplifying and diversifying the population of neurons innervating the central complex, a brain region required for sensorimotor coordination. Type II NSCs express over a dozen genes temporally, broadly classified as early and late-expressed genes. A conserved gene, Seven-up mediates early to late gene expression by activating ecdysone receptor (EcR) expression. However, what determines the timing of EcR expression and, hence, early to late gene transition is unknown. This study investigates whether intrinsic mechanisms of cell cycle progression and cytokinesis are required to induce the NSC early-late transition. By generating mutant clones that arrest the NSC cell cycle or block cytokinesis, we show that both processes are necessary for the early-to-late transitions. When NSCs are cell cycle or cytokinesis arrested, the early gene Imp failed to be down-regulated and persisted into the old NSCs, while the late factors EcR and Syncrip failed to be expressed. Furthermore, we show that the early factor Seven-up is insufficient to drive the transition despite its normal expression in the cell cycle- or cytokinesis-inhibited NSCs. These results suggest that both intrinsic (cell cycle/cytokinesis) and extrinsic (hormone) cues are required for the early-late NSC gene expression transition.

References
1.
Wang Y, Yang J, Johnston R, Ren Q, Lee Y, Luan H . Drosophila intermediate neural progenitors produce lineage-dependent related series of diverse neurons. Development. 2013; 141(2):253-8. PMC: 3879808. DOI: 10.1242/dev.103069. View

2.
Enriquez J, Quintana Rio L, Blazeski R, Bellemin S, Godement P, Mason C . Differing Strategies Despite Shared Lineages of Motor Neurons and Glia to Achieve Robust Development of an Adult Neuropil in Drosophila. Neuron. 2018; 97(3):538-554.e5. PMC: 5941948. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.01.007. View

3.
Doe C, Goodman C . Early events in insect neurogenesis. II. The role of cell interactions and cell lineage in the determination of neuronal precursor cells. Dev Biol. 1985; 111(1):206-19. DOI: 10.1016/0012-1606(85)90446-4. View

4.
Ren Q, Yang C, Liu Z, Sugino K, Mok K, He Y . Stem Cell-Intrinsic, Seven-up-Triggered Temporal Factor Gradients Diversify Intermediate Neural Progenitors. Curr Biol. 2017; 27(9):1303-1313. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.03.047. View

5.
Salomoni P, Calegari F . Cell cycle control of mammalian neural stem cells: putting a speed limit on G1. Trends Cell Biol. 2010; 20(5):233-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2010.01.006. View