Using Evidence-Based Practice in the Transition to Telepractice: Case Study of a Complexity-Based Speech Sound Intervention

Overview

Journal Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups

Date 2025 Jan 27

PMID 39867874

Authors

Abby John

Irina Potapova

Alicia Escobedo

Philip Combiths

Jessica Barlow

Sonja Pruitt-Lord

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) are tasked with integrating the principles of evidence-based practice (EBP) to provide effective and efficient assessment and intervention services that best support clients and their families. As new research, technologies, and perspectives emerge, SLPs are required to adapt their clinical practices to meet these changes while maintaining high-quality evidence-based services. Through an illustrative case study, we aim to demonstrate the process of applying EBP principles - including research evidence, client and family perspectives, and clinical expertise - to a complexity-based speech sound intervention delivered via telepractice.

Conclusion: Results of the case study suggest that utilizing the principles of EBP to transition an evidence-based complexity intervention to telepractice was successful. Additionally, the EBP framework provided opportunities for reflection and continued adaptation throughout the intervention. The process of applying an EBP framework to a quickly evolving clinical practice environment provides SLPs with essential tools that ensure their services meet the needs of the clients they serve.

Citing Articles

Extending Complexity to Word-Final Position via Telepractice: Intervention Effects for English-Speaking Children With Speech Sound Disorder.

Potapova I, John A, Pruitt-Lord S, Barlow J Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2024; 56(1):42-57.

PMID: 39496072 PMC: 11903049. DOI: 10.1044/2024_LSHSS-24-00020.

References

McLeod S, Harrison L, McCormack J . The intelligibility in Context Scale: validity and reliability of a subjective rating measure. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2012; 55(2):648-56. DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0130). View

Baker E, McLeod S . Evidence-based practice for children with speech sound disorders: part 2 application to clinical practice. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2010; 42(2):140-51. DOI: 10.1044/0161-1461(2010/10-0023). View

Vismara L, Young G, Rogers S . Telehealth for expanding the reach of early autism training to parents. Autism Res Treat. 2012; 2012:121878. PMC: 3512210. DOI: 10.1155/2012/121878. View

Shriberg L, Austin D, Lewis B, McSweeny J, Wilson D . The percentage of consonants correct (PCC) metric: extensions and reliability data. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997; 40(4):708-22. DOI: 10.1044/jslhr.4004.708. View

Porter K, Oetting J, Pecchioni L . Caregivers' Perceptions of Speech-Language Pathologist Talk About Child Language and Literacy Disorders. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2020; 29(4):2049-2067. DOI: 10.1044/2020_AJSLP-20-00049. View

Powell T, Elbert M, Dinnsen D . Stimulability as a factor in the phonological generalization of misarticulating preschool children. J Speech Hear Res. 1991; 34(6):1318-28. DOI: 10.1044/jshr.3406.1318. View

McCullough A . Viability and effectiveness of teletherapy for pre-school children with special needs. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2001; 36 Suppl:321-6. DOI: 10.3109/13682820109177905. View

Combiths P, Amberg R, Hedlund G, Rose Y, Barlow J . Automated phonological analysis and treatment target selection using AutoPATT. Clin Linguist Phon. 2021; 36(2-3):203-218. PMC: 8642465. DOI: 10.1080/02699206.2021.1896782. View

Olszewski A, Rae K . Measuring Stakeholder Perceptions: A Review of Social Validity Reporting in ASHA Journals. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2021; 30(3):1247-1260. DOI: 10.1044/2021_AJSLP-20-00169. View

10.

Gierut J . Treatment efficacy: functional phonological disorders in children. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1998; 41(1):S85-100. DOI: 10.1044/jslhr.4101.s85. View

11.

Potapova I, Combiths P, Pruitt-Lord S, Barlow J . Word-final complexity in speech sound intervention: two case studies. Clin Linguist Phon. 2022; 37(4-6):363-384. PMC: 10024642. DOI: 10.1080/02699206.2022.2122082. View

12.

Baker E, McLeod S . Evidence-based practice for children with speech sound disorders: part 1 narrative review. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2010; 42(2):102-39. DOI: 10.1044/0161-1461(2010/09-0075). View

13.

Storkel H . The Complexity Approach to Phonological Treatment: How to Select Treatment Targets. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2018; 49(3):463-481. DOI: 10.1044/2017_LSHSS-17-0082. View

14.

Combiths P, Pruitt-Lord S, Escobedo A, Barlow J . Phonological complexity in intervention for Spanish-speaking children with speech sound disorder. Clin Linguist Phon. 2021; 36(2-3):219-240. PMC: 8660952. DOI: 10.1080/02699206.2021.1936186. View

15.

Coufal K, Parham D, Jakubowitz M, Howell C, Reyes J . Comparing Traditional Service Delivery and Telepractice for Speech Sound Production Using a Functional Outcome Measure. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2017; 27(1):82-90. DOI: 10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0070. View

16.

Shriberg L, Kwiatkowski J . Phonological disorders II: a conceptual framework for management. J Speech Hear Disord. 1982; 47(3):242-56. DOI: 10.1044/jshd.4703.242. View

17.

Rvachew S, Nowak M . The effect of target-selection strategy on phonological learning. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2001; 44(3):610-23. DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2001/050). View

18.

Raman N, Nagarajan R, Venkatesh L, Monica D, Ramkumar V, Krumm M . School-based language screening among primary school children using telepractice: A feasibility study from India. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018; 21(4):425-434. DOI: 10.1080/17549507.2018.1493142. View

19.

Fitton L, Bustamante K, Wood C . The Social Validity of Telepractice among Spanish-Speaking Caregivers of English Learners: An Examination of Moderators. Int J Telerehabil. 2017; 9(2):13-24. PMC: 5716612. DOI: 10.5195/ijt.2017.6227. View

20.

Law J, Dornstauder M, Charlton J, Greaux M . Tele-practice for children and young people with communication disabilities: Employing the COM-B model to review the intervention literature and inform guidance for practitioners. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2021; 56(2):415-434. DOI: 10.1111/1460-6984.12592. View