Evaluation of Utilization of Amplified Blastocoel Fluid DNA Gel Electrophoresis Band Intensity As an Additional Minimally Invasive Approach in Embryo Selection: A Cross-sectional Study

Overview

Journal Int J Reprod Biomed

Date 2025 Jan 27

PMID 39866585

Authors

Fattaneh Khajehoseini

Zahra Noormohammadi

Poopak Eftekhari-Yazdi

Hamid Gourabi

Reza Pazhoomand

Shirzad Hosseinishenatal

Masood Bazrgar

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Embryo selection for transfer is critical in assisted reproduction. The presence of DNA in the blastocoel cavity of human blastocysts is assumed to be a consequence of common preimplantation chromosomal abnormalities.

Objective: This study examined the relationship between the amount of blastocoel fluid (BF) DNA and the band intensity of amplified BF-DNA in gel electrophoresis, considering the influence of ploidy status.

Materials And Methods: This cross-sectional study categorizes blastocysts into 2 groups based on the array comparative genomic hybridization results by trophectoderm biopsy -the euploid and aneuploid group. After morphological scoring, a biopsy of BF was performed for whole genome amplification, followed by an assessment of band intensity and BF-DNA quantification. The relationship between BF-DNA levels, band intensity, and ploidy status were analyzed.

Results: The level of BF-DNA was higher in the aneuploid group compared to the euploid group, but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.2). We observed that the band intensity was affected by the ploidy status of the embryos, although this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.059). Notably, electrophoresis band of all embryos with chromosomal loss was strong. No correlation was observed between embryo morphology and chromosomal ploidy (p = 0.8).

Conclusion: Our findings indicate that BF-DNA band intensity on agarose gel is not currently applicable for preimplantation embryo selection. It seems that embryos with chromosomal loss are more prone to DNA release to BF. The disrelation between embryo morphology and ploidy status represents the necessity of minimally invasive embryo screening methods based on ploidy status.

References

Gianaroli L, Magli M, Pomante A, Crivello A, Cafueri G, Valerio M . Blastocentesis: a source of DNA for preimplantation genetic testing. Results from a pilot study. Fertil Steril. 2014; 102(6):1692-9.e6. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.08.021. View

Vining L, Zak L, Harvey S, Harvey K . The role of apoptosis in cryopreserved animal oocytes and embryos. Theriogenology. 2021; 173:93-101. DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2021.07.017. View

Homer H . Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A): The biology, the technology and the clinical outcomes. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019; 59(2):317-324. DOI: 10.1111/ajo.12960. View

Capalbo A, Romanelli V, Patassini C, Poli M, Girardi L, Giancani A . Diagnostic efficacy of blastocoel fluid and spent media as sources of DNA for preimplantation genetic testing in standard clinical conditions. Fertil Steril. 2018; 110(5):870-879.e5. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.05.031. View

Magli M, Albanese C, Crippa A, Tabanelli C, Ferraretti A, Gianaroli L . Deoxyribonucleic acid detection in blastocoelic fluid: a new predictor of embryo ploidy and viable pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 2018; 111(1):77-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.09.016. View

Bolton H, Graham S, VAN DER Aa N, Kumar P, Theunis K, Fernandez Gallardo E . Mouse model of chromosome mosaicism reveals lineage-specific depletion of aneuploid cells and normal developmental potential. Nat Commun. 2016; 7:11165. PMC: 4820631. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms11165. View

Garcia-Pascual C, Navarro-Sanchez L, Ichikawa-Ceschin I, Bakalova D, Martinez-Merino L, Simon C . Cell-free deoxyribonucleic acid analysis in preimplantation genetic testing. F S Sci. 2023; 4(2S):7-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.xfss.2023.01.001. View

Fesahat F, Montazeri F, Sheikhha M, Saeedi H, Firouzabadi R, Kalantar S . Frequency of chromosomal aneuploidy in high quality embryos from young couples using preimplantation genetic screening. Int J Reprod Biomed. 2017; 15(5):297-304. PMC: 5510583. View

Tobler K, Zhao Y, Ross R, Benner A, Xu X, Du L . Blastocoel fluid from differentiated blastocysts harbors embryonic genomic material capable of a whole-genome deoxyribonucleic acid amplification and comprehensive chromosome microarray analysis. Fertil Steril. 2015; 104(2):418-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.04.028. View

10.

Zhang Y, Li N, Wang L, Sun H, Ma M, Wang H . Molecular analysis of DNA in blastocoele fluid using next-generation sequencing. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016; 33(5):637-645. PMC: 4870435. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-016-0667-7. View

11.

Zaninovic N, Irani M, Meseguer M . Assessment of embryo morphology and developmental dynamics by time-lapse microscopy: is there a relation to implantation and ploidy?. Fertil Steril. 2017; 108(5):722-729. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.10.002. View

12.

Rubio C, Bellver J, Rodrigo L, Castillon G, Guillen A, Vidal C . In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidies in advanced maternal age: a randomized, controlled study. Fertil Steril. 2017; 107(5):1122-1129. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.03.011. View

13.

Schattman G . Chromosomal mosaicism in human preimplantation embryos: another fact that cannot be ignored. Fertil Steril. 2018; 109(1):54-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.11.022. View

14.

Magli M, Pomante A, Cafueri G, Valerio M, Crippa A, Ferraretti A . Preimplantation genetic testing: polar bodies, blastomeres, trophectoderm cells, or blastocoelic fluid?. Fertil Steril. 2015; 105(3):676-683.e5. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.11.018. View

15.

Nagy Z, Shapiro D, Chang C . Vitrification of the human embryo: a more efficient and safer in vitro fertilization treatment. Fertil Steril. 2020; 113(2):241-247. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.12.009. View

16.

Starostik M, Sosina O, McCoy R . Single-cell analysis of human embryos reveals diverse patterns of aneuploidy and mosaicism. Genome Res. 2020; 30(6):814-825. PMC: 7370883. DOI: 10.1101/gr.262774.120. View

17.

Palini S, Galluzzi L, De Stefani S, Bianchi M, Wells D, Magnani M . Genomic DNA in human blastocoele fluid. Reprod Biomed Online. 2013; 26(6):603-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.02.012. View

18.

Rienzi L, Capalbo A, Stoppa M, Romano S, Maggiulli R, Albricci L . No evidence of association between blastocyst aneuploidy and morphokinetic assessment in a selected population of poor-prognosis patients: a longitudinal cohort study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014; 30(1):57-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.09.012. View

19.

Bazrgar M, Gourabi H, Yazdi P, Vazirinasab H, Fakhri M, Hassani F . DNA repair signalling pathway genes are overexpressed in poor-quality pre-implantation human embryos with complex aneuploidy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014; 175:152-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.01.010. View

20.

Antonouli S, Di Nisio V, Messini C, Daponte A, Rajender S, Anifandis G . A comprehensive review and update on human fertility cryopreservation methods and tools. Front Vet Sci. 2023; 10:1151254. PMC: 10151698. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1151254. View