Medical Malpractice Litigation Following Humeral Fractures in the United States

Overview

Journal Shoulder Elbow

Date 2025 Jan 27

PMID 39866536

Authors

Martinus Megalla

Jay M Zaifman

Zachary T Grace

Nareena Imam

Eitan M Kohan

Frank G Alberta

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study is to characterize malpractice claims against orthopedic surgeons treating humeral fractures and determine factors associated with plaintiff verdicts and settlements.

Methods: The Westlaw legal database was queried for all cases involving humeral fractures. Patient demographics, causes cited for litigation, case outcomes, and indemnity payments were collected to determine common factors that lead plaintiffs to pursue legal action.

Results: Fifty-seven cases were identified that met inclusion criteria. The mean plaintiff age was 52.5 years with 61% female. The most common category of negligence was treatment error, which occurred in 29 claims (51%). The most common types of damages incurred were functional limitation (40%), nerve injury (32%), and malunion/nonunion (26%). Overall, 42 cases (74%) resulted in a defense verdict. Four cases (7%) resulted in settlements and 11 cases (19%) resulted in plaintiff verdicts. Cases that resulted in plaintiff verdicts or settlements were treated with intramedullary nails more often than those with defense verdicts (27% vs. 4.8%, p = 0.036).

Discussion: These findings highlight the importance of effective communication with patients regarding treatment modalities, risks and benefits, and prognosis of their injury.

Level Of Evidence: IV; Case Series using Large Database; Epidemiology Study.

References

Updegrove G, Mourad W, Abboud J . Humeral shaft fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018; 27(4):e87-e97. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.10.028. View

Wang X, Zhang P, Zhou Y, Zhu C . Secondary radial nerve palsy after internal fixation of humeral shaft fractures. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2013; 24(3):331-3. DOI: 10.1007/s00590-013-1197-y. View

Gottschalk M, Carpenter W, Hiza E, Reisman W, Roberson J . Humeral Shaft Fracture Fixation: Incidence Rates and Complications as Reported by American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Part II Candidates. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016; 98(17):e71. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.15.01049. View

Zhao J, Wang J, Wang C, Kan S . Intramedullary nail versus plate fixation for humeral shaft fractures: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015; 94(11):e599. PMC: 4602489. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000599. View

Cognetti D, Arana A, Hoof M, Mason G, Lin A, Sheean A . Short-term Complications for Proximal Humerus Fracture Surgery Have Decreased: An Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022; 480(11):2122-2133. PMC: 9556111. DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002391. View

Changulani M, Jain U, Keswani T . Comparison of the use of the humerus intramedullary nail and dynamic compression plate for the management of diaphyseal fractures of the humerus. A randomised controlled study. Int Orthop. 2006; 31(3):391-5. PMC: 2267584. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-006-0200-1. View

Rynecki N, Coban D, Gantz O, Gupta R, Ayyaswami V, Prabhu A . Medical Malpractice in Orthopedic Surgery: A Westlaw-Based Demographic Analysis. Orthopedics. 2018; 41(5):e615-e620. DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20180621-06. View

Ljungquist K, Martineau P, Allan C . Radial nerve injuries. J Hand Surg Am. 2014; 40(1):166-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.05.010. View

Ahmed S, DeFroda S, Naqvi S, Eltorai A, Hartnett D, Ruddell J . Malpractice Litigation Following Traumatic Fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019; 101(7):e27. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00853. View

10.

Beckman H, Markakis K, Suchman A, Frankel R . The doctor-patient relationship and malpractice. Lessons from plaintiff depositions. Arch Intern Med. 1994; 154(12):1365-70. View

11.

Jena A, Seabury S, Lakdawalla D, Chandra A . Malpractice risk according to physician specialty. N Engl J Med. 2011; 365(7):629-36. PMC: 3204310. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa1012370. View

12.

Vincent C, Young M, Phillips A . Why do people sue doctors? A study of patients and relatives taking legal action. Lancet. 1994; 343(8913):1609-13. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)93062-7. View

13.

Nemes S, Jonasson J, Genell A, Steineck G . Bias in odds ratios by logistic regression modelling and sample size. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009; 9:56. PMC: 2724427. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-9-56. View

14.

Beks R, Ochen Y, Frima H, Smeeing D, van der Meijden O, Timmers T . Operative versus nonoperative treatment of proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and comparison of observational studies and randomized controlled trials. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018; 27(8):1526-1534. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.03.009. View

15.

Megalla M, Imam N, Bukowiec L, Coban D, Malik M, Grace Z . Medical malpractice litigation after total shoulder arthroplasty: a comprehensive analysis based on the Westlaw legal database. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022; 32(3):539-545. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.09.010. View

16.

Rommens P, Kuechle R, Bord T, Lewens T, Engelmann R, Blum J . Humeral nailing revisited. Injury. 2008; 39(12):1319-28. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.01.014. View

17.

Thabet A, Adams A, Jeon S, Pisquiy J, Gelhert R, DeCoster T . Malpractice lawsuits in orthopedic trauma surgery: a meta-analysis of the literature. OTA Int. 2022; 5(3):e199. PMC: 9580045. DOI: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000199. View

18.

Higgins L . Medicolegal aspects of the orthopaedic care for shoulder injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005; (433):58-64. DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000159894.86946.23. View

19.

Kim S, Szabo R, Marder R . Epidemiology of humerus fractures in the United States: nationwide emergency department sample, 2008. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011; 64(3):407-14. DOI: 10.1002/acr.21563. View

20.

Mello M, Chandra A, Gawande A, Studdert D . National costs of the medical liability system. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010; 29(9):1569-77. PMC: 3048809. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0807. View