» Articles » PMID: 39866385

Effects of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation for Quadriceps Muscle Thickness and Lower Extremity Motor Score in Individuals with Subacute Incomplete Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview
Journal Phys Ther Res
Date 2025 Jan 27
PMID 39866385
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: In this study, we aimed to determine the effects of 2-week neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) on quadriceps muscle atrophy and lower extremity motor score in individuals with subacute incomplete cervical spinal cord injury (SCI).

Methods: This stratified randomized controlled trial, conducted in the advanced critical care center of a university hospital, comprised 49 individuals with American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale grade C and D incomplete cervical SCI. The participants were stratified based on the ASIA impairment scale grade and randomly assigned to the control (n = 25) or NMES (n = 24) group. The control group participants received only conventional rehabilitation; the NMES group participants received conventional rehabilitation plus NMES in the quadriceps muscles of both lower limbs. The primary endpoints were quadriceps muscle thickness and L3 ASIA lower extremity motor score (L3 motor score), measured at the study's initiation and after 2 weeks.

Results: The quadriceps muscle thickness changes on the stronger and weaker sides were -14.2% ± 11.3% and -15.1% ± 13.8%, respectively, in the NMES group and -25.7% ± 16.8% and -26.0% ± 13.3%, respectively, in the control group, indicating significantly lesser reduction on both sides in the NMES group ( <0.05). The L3 motor scores on the stronger and weaker sides were 0.8 ± 1.2 and 1.3 ± 1.4 (NMES group) and 0.4 ± 0.8 and 0.4 ± 0.8 (control group), respectively, indicating significant improvement only on the weaker side ( <0.05).

Conclusions: For subacute incomplete cervical SCI, 2 weeks of NMES reduces quadriceps muscle atrophy and improves the L3 motor score values on the weaker side compared with standard treatment.

References
1.
Modlesky C, Bickel C, Slade J, Meyer R, Cureton K, Dudley G . Assessment of skeletal muscle mass in men with spinal cord injury using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and magnetic resonance imaging. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2003; 96(2):561-5. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00207.2003. View

2.
Gruther W, Benesch T, Zorn C, Paternostro-Sluga T, Quittan M, Fialka-Moser V . Muscle wasting in intensive care patients: ultrasound observation of the M. quadriceps femoris muscle layer. J Rehabil Med. 2008; 40(3):185-9. DOI: 10.2340/16501977-0139. View

3.
Moore C, Craven B, Thabane L, Laing A, Frank-Wilson A, Kontulainen S . Lower-extremity muscle atrophy and fat infiltration after chronic spinal cord injury. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2015; 15(1):32-41. PMC: 5092153. View

4.
Jaja B, Jiang F, Badhiwala J, Schar R, Kurpad S, Grossman R . Association of Pneumonia, Wound Infection, and Sepsis with Clinical Outcomes after Acute Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury. J Neurotrauma. 2019; 36(21):3044-3050. PMC: 6791472. DOI: 10.1089/neu.2018.6245. View

5.
Arias-Fernandez P, Romero-Martin M, Gomez-Salgado J, Fernandez-Garcia D . Rehabilitation and early mobilization in the critical patient: systematic review. J Phys Ther Sci. 2018; 30(9):1193-1201. PMC: 6127491. DOI: 10.1589/jpts.30.1193. View