» Articles » PMID: 39865562

Real-world Treatment Patterns and Health Outcomes for Patients with Myelofibrosis Treated with Fedratinib

Overview
Journal Future Oncol
Date 2025 Jan 27
PMID 39865562
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: Assess real-world fedratinib (FEDR) treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with primary or secondary myelofibrosis following discontinuation of ruxolitinib (RUX).

Patients & Methods: This study was a retrospective, noninterventional medical record review of patients in Canada, Germany, and the United Kingdom (UK). A total of 70 physicians (primarily hematologist-oncologists [78.6%]) provided data for 196 eligible patients.

Results: Patients were mostly male (62.8%) with primary myelofibrosis (76.5%) and initiated FEDR at a mean age of 67.7 years. Median treatment duration was 11.5 months (median follow-up, 13.8 months), and nearly half (49.5%) of patients initiated FEDR at the label-indicated dose of 400 mg daily. Six months post-initiation, 77.7% and 66.8% of patients experienced symptom and spleen response, respectively. Kaplan-Meier estimates of median progression-free and overall survival from initiation were 23.8 months (95% CI, 21.1-27.6) and 29.8 months (95% CI, 23.9-NE), respectively.

Conclusion: These findings demonstrate real-world FEDR effectiveness among patients with myelofibrosis who discontinued RUX.

Citing Articles

Fedratinib for the treatment of myelofibrosis: a critical appraisal of clinical trial and "real-world" data.

Duek A, Leviatan I, Jarchowsky Dolberg O, Ellis M Blood Cancer J. 2025; 15(1):6.

PMID: 39809782 PMC: 11732969. DOI: 10.1038/s41408-025-01211-1.

References
1.
Cervantes F, Passamonti F, Barosi G . Life expectancy and prognostic factors in the classic BCR/ABL-negative myeloproliferative disorders. Leukemia. 2008; 22(5):905-14. DOI: 10.1038/leu.2008.72. View

2.
Harrison C, Vannucchi A, Platzbecker U, Cervantes F, Gupta V, Lavie D . Momelotinib versus best available therapy in patients with myelofibrosis previously treated with ruxolitinib (SIMPLIFY 2): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2017; 5(2):e73-e81. DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3026(17)30237-5. View

3.
Iurlo A, Cattaneo D . Treatment of Myelofibrosis: Old and New Strategies. Clin Med Insights Blood Disord. 2017; 10:1179545X17695233. PMC: 5428134. DOI: 10.1177/1179545X17695233. View

4.
Thiele J, Kvasnicka H, Orazi A, Gianelli U, Gangat N, Vannucchi A . The international consensus classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute Leukemias: myeloproliferative neoplasms. Am J Hematol. 2022; 98(1):166-179. DOI: 10.1002/ajh.26751. View

5.
Mascarenhas J, Harrison C, Schuler T, Liassou D, Garretson M, Miller T . Real-World Use of Fedratinib for Myelofibrosis Following Prior Ruxolitinib Failure: Patient Characteristics, Treatment Patterns, and Clinical Outcomes. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2023; 24(2):122-132. DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2023.09.008. View