Practice Makes Better? The Influence of Increased Practice on Task Conflict in the Stroop Task

Overview

Journal Mem Cognit

Date 2025 Jan 25

PMID 39863745

Authors

Jonathan Najenson

Rut Zaks-Ohayon

Joseph Tzelgov

Nir Fresco

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The Stroop task is widely used to study attentional control and cognitive flexibility. However, questions about its sensitivity to training and the impact of task conflict on attentional control remain open. We investigated the effects of practice and task conflict on attentional control in the Stroop task, with participants completing four sessions of a Stroop task over 3 weeks in low and high task-conflict conditions. Our results show that the level of task conflict had an impact only in the first session, even though participants remained sensitive to task conflict throughout all four sessions. Moreover, we found that practice reduced response times in the Stroop task, for both congruent and incongruent trials. Nevertheless, the interference between congruent and incongruent stimuli remained consistent over the 3-week period, indicating that inter-condition interference is not affected by training. Our study, therefore, suggests that the extent to which the level of task conflict modulates Stroop task performance is only partially sensitive to training. These findings provide further insights into the role of task conflict and practice in attentional control and cognitive flexibility.

References

Altmann E . Functional decay of memory for tasks. Psychol Res. 2002; 66(4):287-97. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-002-0102-9. View

Blais C, Robidoux S, Risko E, Besner D . Item-specific adaptation and the conflict-monitoring hypothesis: a computational model. Psychol Rev. 2007; 114(4):1076-86. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.1076. View

Botvinick M, Braver T, Barch D, Carter C, Cohen J . Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychol Rev. 2001; 108(3):624-52. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.108.3.624. View

Botvinick M, Cohen J, Carter C . Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update. Trends Cogn Sci. 2004; 8(12):539-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.10.003. View

Braem S, Bugg J, Schmidt J, Crump M, Weissman D, Notebaert W . Measuring Adaptive Control in Conflict Tasks. Trends Cogn Sci. 2019; 23(9):769-783. PMC: 6699878. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.07.002. View

Braverman A, Meiran N . Conflict control in task conflict and response conflict. Psychol Res. 2014; 79(2):238-48. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-014-0565-5. View

Bugg J, Jacoby L, Chanani S . Why it is too early to lose control in accounts of item-specific proportion congruency effects. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010; 37(3):844-59. DOI: 10.1037/a0019957. View

Campbell J, Thompson V . MorePower 6.0 for ANOVA with relational confidence intervals and Bayesian analysis. Behav Res Methods. 2012; 44(4):1255-65. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-012-0186-0. View

Cepeda N, Vul E, Rohrer D, Wixted J, Pashler H . Spacing effects in learning: a temporal ridgeline of optimal retention. Psychol Sci. 2008; 19(11):1095-102. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02209.x. View

10.

Chen A, Tang D, Chen X . Training reveals the sources of Stroop and Flanker interference effects. PLoS One. 2013; 8(10):e76580. PMC: 3795719. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076580. View

11.

Cohen J, Dunbar K, McClelland J . On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychol Rev. 1990; 97(3):332-61. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.97.3.332. View

12.

Dulaney C, Rogers W . Mechanisms underlying reduction in Stroop interference with practice for young and old adults. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1994; 20(2):470-84. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.20.2.470. View

13.

Entel O, Tzelgov J . Focusing on task conflict in the Stroop effect. Psychol Res. 2016; 82(2):284-295. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-016-0832-8. View

14.

Entel O, Tzelgov J, Bereby-Meyer Y, Shahar N . Exploring relations between task conflict and informational conflict in the Stroop task. Psychol Res. 2014; 79(6):913-27. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-014-0630-0. View

15.

Garcia-Rueda L, Poch C, Campo P . Forgetting Details in Visual Long-Term Memory: Decay or Interference?. Front Behav Neurosci. 2022; 16:887321. PMC: 9345118. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.887321. View

16.

Goldfarb L, Henik A . Evidence for task conflict in the Stroop effect. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007; 33(5):1170-6. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.5.1170. View

17.

Gratton G, Coles M, Donchin E . Optimizing the use of information: strategic control of activation of responses. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1992; 121(4):480-506. DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.121.4.480. View

18.

Grutzmann R, Kathmann N, Heinzel S . Effects of a three-week executive control training on adaptation to task difficulty and emotional interference. PLoS One. 2022; 17(11):e0276994. PMC: 9681094. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276994. View

19.

Haith A, Krakauer J . The multiple effects of practice: skill, habit and reduced cognitive load. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2019; 20:196-201. PMC: 6443249. DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.01.015. View

20.

Hardt O, Nader K, Nadel L . Decay happens: the role of active forgetting in memory. Trends Cogn Sci. 2013; 17(3):111-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.01.001. View