» Articles » PMID: 39862179

Quantitative Evaluation of Multiple Treatment Regimens for Treatment-resistant Depression

Overview
Date 2025 Jan 25
PMID 39862179
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: This study aims to quantitatively evaluate the efficacy and safety of various treatment regimens for treatment-resistant depression (TRD) across oral, intravenous, and intranasal routes to inform clinical guidelines.

Methods: A systematic review identified randomized controlled trials on TRD, with efficacy measured by changes in the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). We developed pharmacodynamic and covariate models for different administration routes, using Monte Carlo simulations to estimate efficacy distribution. Dropout and adverse event-related dropout rates were analyzed via single-arm meta-analysis.

Results: Involving 22 studies with 56 treatment arms and 3059 patients, our findings suggest combination therapies outperform monotherapy, achieving an additional 6.5% reduction in MADRS scores over 12 weeks. The most effective combinations were olanzapine with fluoxetine and quetiapine with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors/ selective serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors. Injectable treatments, particularly ayahuasca, produced rapid effects, with a 77% reduction in MADRS scores at 15 days. Intranasal treatments reached efficacy sooner than oral ones, with 28-day efficacy similar to the 12-week efficacy of the olanzapine-fluoxetine combination. Dropout rates due to adverse events were similar across methods (4.5%-5.2%), but total dropouts were highest for oral (17.9%) and lowest for intranasal routes (10.6%). Additionally, there was considerable variation in the incidence of headache, dizziness, and nausea across different administration routes.

Conclusions: The quantitative evaluation of 22 TRD treatments illuminates key pharmacodynamic parameters, bolstering the development of clinical guidelines and aiding the design of clinical trials and medical decision-making.

References
1.
Kin K, Yasuhara T, Kawauchi S, Kameda M, Hosomoto K, Tomita Y . Lithium counteracts depressive behavior and augments the treatment effect of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor in treatment-resistant depressed rats. Brain Res. 2019; 1717:52-59. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2019.04.001. View

2.
Lin C, Lin S, Jang F . Adjunctive low-dose aripiprazole with standard-dose sertraline in treating fresh major depressive disorder: a randomized, double-blind, controlled study. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2011; 31(5):563-8. DOI: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e31822bb0db. View

3.
Fava M, Freeman M, Flynn M, Judge H, Hoeppner B, Cusin C . Double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging trial of intravenous ketamine as adjunctive therapy in treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Mol Psychiatry. 2018; 25(7):1592-1603. PMC: 6447473. DOI: 10.1038/s41380-018-0256-5. View

4.
Hieronymus F, Lisinski A, Eriksson E, Ostergaard S . Do side effects of antidepressants impact efficacy estimates based on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale? A pooled patient-level analysis. Transl Psychiatry. 2021; 11(1):249. PMC: 8079707. DOI: 10.1038/s41398-021-01364-0. View

5.
Ivan Ezquerra-Romano I, Lawn W, Krupitsky E, Morgan C . Ketamine for the treatment of addiction: Evidence and potential mechanisms. Neuropharmacology. 2018; 142:72-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2018.01.017. View