» Articles » PMID: 39858162

Linking Animal Feed Formulation to Milk Quantity, Quality, and Animal Health Through Data-Driven Decision-Making

Overview
Journal Animals (Basel)
Date 2025 Jan 25
PMID 39858162
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The global demand for high-quality animal products, particularly dairy, has intensified the need for more precise and efficient livestock feed formulation. This review connects data-driven decision-making in optimizing feed formulation to enhance milk quantity and quality while addressing animal health implications. Modern feed formulation has evolved into a sophisticated, data-centric process by integrating diverse data sources such as nutritional databases, environmental data, and animal performance metrics. Leveraging advanced analytical techniques, such as machine learning and optimization algorithms, have created highly accurate feed formulations tailored to specific livestock needs. These innovations increase milk yield and contribute to developing dairy products with higher nutritional value. Decision Support Systems play a complementary role by offering real-time decision-making capabilities, enabling farmers to make data-informed adjustments composition based on changing conditions. However, despite its potential, the widespread adoption of data-driven feed formulation faces challenges such as data quality, technological limitations, and industry resistance, mostly disjointed processes. The objectives of this review are: (i) to explore the current advancements and challenges of data-driven decision-making in feed formulation, focusing on its connection to milk quantity and quality, and (ii) to highlight how this optimized feed formulation strategy improves sustainable dairy production.

References
1.
Kanza S, Bird C, Niranjan M, McNeill W, Frey J . The AI for Scientific Discovery Network. Patterns (N Y). 2021; 2(1):100162. PMC: 7815949. DOI: 10.1016/j.patter.2020.100162. View

2.
Duguma B, Paul Jules Janssens G . Assessment of feed resources, feeding practices and coping strategies to feed scarcity by smallholder urban dairy producers in Jimma town, Ethiopia. Springerplus. 2016; 5(1):717. PMC: 4908093. DOI: 10.1186/s40064-016-2417-9. View

3.
Salama A, Such X, Caja G, Rovai M, Casals R, Albanell E . Effects of once versus twice daily milking throughout lactation on milk yield and milk composition in dairy goats. J Dairy Sci. 2003; 86(5):1673-80. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73753-9. View

4.
Bellingeri A, Gallo A, Liang D, Masoero F, Cabrera V . Development of a linear programming model for the optimal allocation of nutritional resources in a dairy herd. J Dairy Sci. 2020; 103(11):10898-10916. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2020-18157. View

5.
Srednicka-Tober D, Baranski M, Seal C, Sanderson R, Benbrook C, Steinshamn H . Higher PUFA and n-3 PUFA, conjugated linoleic acid, α-tocopherol and iron, but lower iodine and selenium concentrations in organic milk: a systematic literature review and meta- and redundancy analyses. Br J Nutr. 2016; 115(6):1043-60. PMC: 4838834. DOI: 10.1017/S0007114516000349. View