» Articles » PMID: 39858099

The Role of the Tumor Microenvironment in T-Cell Redirecting Therapies of Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Lessons Learned from CAR-T to Bispecific Antibodies

Overview
Journal Cancers (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Date 2025 Jan 25
PMID 39858099
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

T-cell redirecting therapies, which include chimeric antigen receptor T-cells (CAR-Ts) and bispecific antibodies (BSAs), have revolutionized the treatment of relapsed\refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Expanding clinical experience with these advanced therapies shows the potential for the optimization of their use with combination or consolidation strategies, which necessitates the prognostic stratification of patients. While traditional clinical prognostic factors identified in the era of chemotherapy are characterized by limited value, the tumor microenvironment (TME) is becoming a new prognostic cluster. We examine how the heterogeneity of LBCL, characterized by variations in tumor parameters and differences in TME immune cell composition, immune checkpoint expression, and cytokine milieu, correlates with both positive responses and resistance to treatment. While classical parameters such as histological subtype, cell of origin, and target antigen expression lack proven prognostic value for T-cell redirecting therapies, the density and functional state of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, tumor-associated macrophages, and immune checkpoint molecules are shown to be critical determinants of therapeutic success, particularly in CAR-T therapy. We identify several gaps in the current knowledge and suggest that the insights gained from CAR-T experience could be instrumental in refining BSA applications. This report also highlights limitations in the current knowledge, as TME data derive from a limited number of registrational trials with varying methodologies, complicating cross-study comparisons and often focusing on immediate response metrics rather than long-term outcomes. By dissecting the complex interactions within the TME, this review aims to identify new prognostic factors and targets, ultimately fostering more effective and tailored treatment strategies for LBCL patients.

References
1.
Crump M, Neelapu S, Farooq U, Van den Neste E, Kuruvilla J, Westin J . Outcomes in refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: results from the international SCHOLAR-1 study. Blood. 2017; 130(16):1800-1808. PMC: 5649550. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2017-03-769620. View

2.
Caiado F, Manz M . IL-1 in aging and pathologies of hematopoietic stem cells. Blood. 2024; 144(4):368-377. DOI: 10.1182/blood.2023023105. View

2.
Olszewski A, Kurt H, Evens A . Defining and treating high-grade B-cell lymphoma, NOS. Blood. 2021; 140(9):943-954. DOI: 10.1182/blood.2020008374. View

3.
Abramson J, Palomba M, Gordon L, Lunning M, Wang M, Arnason J . Two-year follow-up of lisocabtagene maraleucel in relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma in TRANSCEND NHL 001. Blood. 2023; 143(5):404-416. DOI: 10.1182/blood.2023020854. View

4.
Lenz G, Wright G, Dave S, Xiao W, Powell J, Zhao H . Stromal gene signatures in large-B-cell lymphomas. N Engl J Med. 2008; 359(22):2313-23. PMC: 9103713. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0802885. View