Runnability: A Scoping Review

Overview

Journal Int J Environ Res Public Health

Publisher MDPI

Date 2025 Jan 25

PMID 39857524

Authors

Ashley D Tegart

Nadine Schuurman

Stella R Harden

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Running outdoors is an increasingly popular form of physical activity and has been proven to substantially reduce the risk of major chronic illnesses such as cardiovascular disease. The topic of runnability has received considerable attention but with conflicting conclusions and remaining gaps. The physical environment and its features impact running experiences. Detecting features facilitating and deterring runners is crucial to promoting this physical activity and, therefore, overall health. A scoping review of current literature was conducted to identify environmental factors conducive to running. Online databases were used to identify all articles on runnability to date; a total of one hundred and two (n = 102) papers were selected as they identified environmental correlates preferred by runners. Findings include a preference for green spaces and connecting with nature, perceptions of higher safety away from traffic congestion and pollution, and routes with wide, smooth surfaces and high connectivity. Essentially, natural surroundings are substantially more desirable than urban settings. Studies have shown that even when a running route is within an urban environment, it is usually connected to or between green spaces.

References

Lewis T, Williams D, Tamene M, Clark C . Self-Reported Experiences of Discrimination and Cardiovascular Disease. Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep. 2014; 8(1):365. PMC: 3980947. DOI: 10.1007/s12170-013-0365-2. View

Grobler S, Maresky L, Rossouw R . Blood lead levels of South African long-distance road-runners. Arch Environ Health. 1986; 41(3):155-8. DOI: 10.1080/00039896.1986.9935770. View

Pelucchi C, Negri E, Gallus S, Boffetta P, Tramacere I, La Vecchia C . Long-term particulate matter exposure and mortality: a review of European epidemiological studies. BMC Public Health. 2009; 9:453. PMC: 2797801. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-453. View

Jansen F, Ettema D, Kamphuis C, Pierik F, Dijst M . How do type and size of natural environments relate to physical activity behavior?. Health Place. 2017; 46:73-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.05.005. View

Chow H, Chen K . Development of an Air Pollution Risk Perception Questionnaire for Running Race Runners Based on the Health Belief Model. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(18). PMC: 9517284. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191811419. View

Campos-Uscanga Y, Reyes-Rincon H, Pineda E, Gibert-Isern S, Ramirez-Colina S, Arguelles-Nava V . Running in Natural Spaces: Gender Analysis of Its Relationship with Emotional Intelligence, Psychological Well-Being, and Physical Activity. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(10). PMC: 9141527. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19106019. View

Karusisi N, Bean K, Oppert J, Pannier B, Chaix B . Multiple dimensions of residential environments, neighborhood experiences, and jogging behavior in the RECORD Study. Prev Med. 2012; 55(1):50-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.04.018. View

Gilburn A . New Parkrunners Are Slower and the Attendance Gender Gap Narrowing Making Parkrun More Inclusive. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(4). PMC: 9959326. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20043602. View

Dias A, Fochesatto C, Crochemore-Silva I, Brand C, Mota J, Gaya A . Team sports, running, walking: activity-specific associations with perceived environmental factors in adolescents. Cien Saude Colet. 2022; 27(5):1975-1988. DOI: 10.1590/1413-81232022275.12812021. View

10.

Zhong Q, Li B, Chen Y . How Do Different Urban Footpath Environments Affect the Jogging Preferences of Residents of Different Genders? Empirical Research Based on Trajectory Data. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(21). PMC: 9655205. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192114372. View

11.

van den Berg M, van Poppel M, van Kamp I, Ruijsbroek A, Triguero-Mas M, Gidlow C . Do Physical Activity, Social Cohesion, and Loneliness Mediate the Association Between Time Spent Visiting Green Space and Mental Health?. Environ Behav. 2019; 51(2):144-166. PMC: 6311621. DOI: 10.1177/0013916517738563. View

12.

Pollack K, Gielen A, Ismail M, Mitzner M, Wu M, Links J . Investigating and improving pedestrian safety in an urban environment. Inj Epidemiol. 2016; 1(1):11. PMC: 5005641. DOI: 10.1186/2197-1714-1-11. View

13.

Rosenkrantz L, Schuurman N, Lear S . Environmental Preferences and Concerns of Recreational Trail Runners. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024; 21(1). PMC: 10815876. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21010097. View

14.

Mahindru A, Patil P, Agrawal V . Role of Physical Activity on Mental Health and Well-Being: A Review. Cureus. 2023; 15(1):e33475. PMC: 9902068. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.33475. View

15.

Smiley A, Ramos W, Elliott L, Wolter S . Association between trail use and self-rated wellness and health. BMC Public Health. 2020; 20(1):128. PMC: 6990545. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-8273-0. View

16.

Grigoletto A, Loi A, Maietta Latessa P, Marini S, Rinaldo N, Gualdi-Russo E . Physical Activity Behavior, Motivation and Active Commuting: Relationships with the Use of Green Spaces in Italy. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(15). PMC: 9367901. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19159248. View

17.

Shipway R, Holloway I . Running free: embracing a healthy lifestyle through distance running. Perspect Public Health. 2011; 130(6):270-6. DOI: 10.1177/1757913910379191. View

18.

Thuany M, Bandeira P, Vieira D, Weiss K, Knechtle B, Gomes T . The subject-environment interplay between runners from different Brazilian macro-regions. Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1134797. PMC: 10557527. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1134797. View

19.

Korpilo S, Virtanen T, Saukkonen T, Lehvavirta S . More than A to B: Understanding and managing visitor spatial behaviour in urban forests using public participation GIS. J Environ Manage. 2017; 207:124-133. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.11.020. View

20.

Schuurman N, Rosenkrantz L, Lear S . Environmental Preferences and Concerns of Recreational Road Runners. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(12). PMC: 8296135. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18126268. View