CT Angiography Assessment of Dorsal Pancreatic Artery and Intrapancreatic Arcade Anatomy: Impact on Whipple Surgery Outcomes

Overview

Journal Tomography

Publisher MDPI

Date 2025 Jan 24

PMID 39852689

Authors

Gorkem Ozdemir

Tolga Olmez

Okan Dilek

Berkay Eyi

Alper Sozutek

Ahmet Seker

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background/objectives: The aim was to investigate the association between variations in the dorsal pancreatic artery (DPA) and intrapancreatic arcade anatomy with Whipple procedure outcomes and postoperative complications.

Methods: This retrospective study was conducted with 362 patients who underwent a Whipple procedure at the Department of Gastroenterological Surgery of Adana City Training and Research Hospital between January 2018 and April 2024. All data collected from medical records were compared and statistically analyzed according to the patients' survival status and arcade subtypes.

Results: After excluding cases that did not meet the study criteria, a total of 284 patients were included in the study. DPA was visualized in 55.98% (159/284) of patients, while the intrapancreatic arcade was observed in 25% (71/284). The most common origin of the DPA was the splenic artery in 69.2% (n = 110) of patients, followed by the superior mesenteric artery in 17.6% (n = 28). The frequency of intrapancreatic arcade anatomy variations was as follows: type 1: 28.2% (n = 20), type 2: 49.3% (n = 35) and type 3: 22.5% (n = 16). Arcade type 4 anatomy was not detected. Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) complication was found to be statistically significantly higher in patients with type 3 anatomy ( = 0.042). The 90-day mortality and long-term mortality rates did not differ among the groups based on the variations in both DPA and intrapancreatic arcade anatomy types.

Conclusions: Patients with intrapancreatic arcade type 3 anatomy had a higher risk of POPF complications. Determination of preoperative arcade type by computed tomography (CT) angiography may help to predict the risk of POPF.

References

Macchi V, Picardi E, Porzionato A, Morra A, Bardini R, Loukas M . Anatomo-radiological patterns of pancreatic vascularization, with surgical implications: Clinical and anatomical study. Clin Anat. 2017; 30(5):614-624. DOI: 10.1002/ca.22885. View

Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, Sarr M, Abu Hilal M, Adham M . The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After. Surgery. 2017; 161(3):584-591. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.11.014. View

Nakata K, Higuchi R, Ikenaga N, Sakuma L, Ban D, Nagakawa Y . Precision anatomy for safe approach to pancreatoduodenectomy for both open and minimally invasive procedure: A systematic review. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2021; 29(1):99-113. DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.901. View

Jiang C, Liang Y, Chen Y, Dai Z, Wang W . The anatomical features of dorsal pancreatic artery in the pancreatic head and its clinical significance in laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc. 2020; 35(2):569-575. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07417-7. View

Rousek M, Kachlik D, Zaruba P, Pudil J, Schutz S, Balko J . Vascular supply of postresection pancreatic remnant after pancreaticoduodenectomy: A cadaveric study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023; 102(36):e35049. PMC: 10489493. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000035049. View

Sahora K, Morales-Oyarvide V, Thayer S, Ferrone C, Warshaw A, Lillemoe K . The effect of antecolic versus retrocolic reconstruction on delayed gastric emptying after classic non-pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy. Am J Surg. 2014; 209(6):1028-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.04.015. View

Seykora T, Ecker B, McMillan M, Maggino L, Beane J, Fong Z . The Beneficial Effects of Minimizing Blood Loss in Pancreatoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. 2018; 270(1):147-157. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002714. View

Matsumura H . The significance of the morphology of the dorsal pancreatic artery in determining the presence of the accessory right hepatic artery passing behind the portal vein. Kaibogaku Zasshi. 1998; 73(5):517-27. View

Crocetti D, Sapienza P, Ossola P, Tarallo M, Cavallaro G, Serra R . Does Aberrant Right Hepatic Artery Influence the Surgical Short- and Long-term Outcome of Pancreatoduodenectomy?. In Vivo. 2019; 33(4):1285-1292. PMC: 6689380. DOI: 10.21873/invivo.11601. View

10.

Scaife C, Hewitt K, Mone M, Hansen H, Nelson E, Mulvihill S . Comparison of intraoperative versus delayed enteral feeding tube placement in patients undergoing a Whipple procedure. HPB (Oxford). 2013; 16(1):62-9. PMC: 3892316. DOI: 10.1111/hpb.12072. View

11.

Perwaiz A, Singh A, Singh T, Chaudhary A . Incidence and management of arterial anomalies in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. JOP. 2010; 11(1):25-30. View

12.

Russell T, Labib P, Denson J, Streeter A, Ausania F, Pando E . Postoperative complications after pancreatoduodenectomy for malignancy: results from the Recurrence After Whipple's (RAW) study. BJS Open. 2023; 7(6). PMC: 10689345. DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad106. View

13.

Rammohan A, Sathyanesan J, Palaniappan R, Govindan M . Transpancreatic hepatomesenteric trunk complicating pancreaticoduodenectomy. JOP. 2013; 14(6):649-52. DOI: 10.6092/1590-8577/1641. View

14.

Szuak A, Nemeth K, Korom C, Gati E, Karlinger K, Harsanyi L . Pancreaticoduodenal arterial arcades: Their dominance and variations-their potential clinical relevance. Clin Anat. 2018; 31(4):544-550. DOI: 10.1002/ca.23063. View

15.

Yu H, Wang S, Shyr B, Chen S, Shyr Y, Shyr B . Impact of hepatic artery variation on surgical and oncological outcomes in robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc. 2024; 38(7):3728-3737. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10887-8. View

16.

Wang S, Chen Q, Liu S, Zhang W, Ji B, Liu Y . The Impact of Aberrant Hepatic Artery on Resection Margin and Outcomes of Laparoscopic Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Single-Center Report. World J Surg. 2021; 45(10):3183-3190. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-021-06231-z. View

17.

Lai E, Yang G, Tang C . Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy--a comparative study. Int J Surg. 2012; 10(9):475-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2012.06.003. View

18.

Clavien P, Sanabria J, Strasberg S . Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery. 1992; 111(5):518-26. View

19.

Swami A, Yadav T, Varshney V, Sreesanth K, Dixit S . Hepatic Arterial Variations and Its Implication During Pancreatic Cancer Surgeries. J Gastrointest Cancer. 2021; 52(2):462-470. DOI: 10.1007/s12029-021-00598-x. View

20.

Shukla P, Barreto S, Kulkarni A, Nagarajan G, Fingerhut A . Vascular anomalies encountered during pancreatoduodenectomy: do they influence outcomes?. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009; 17(1):186-93. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-009-0757-1. View