The Validation of a Novel, Sex-Specific LDL-Cholesterol Equation and the Friedewald, Sampson-NIH, and Extended-Martin-Hopkins Equations Against Direct Measurement in Korean Adults

Overview

Journal Metabolites

Publisher MDPI

Date 2025 Jan 24

PMID 39852361

Authors

Hyun Suk Yang

Soo-Nyung Kim

Seungho Lee

Mina Hur

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

: The currently established equations for calculating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLc) do not reflect the sex-specific differences in lipid metabolism. We aimed to develop a sex-specific LDLc equation (SSLE) and validate it with three established equations (Friedewald, Sampson-NIH, and ext-Martin-Hopkins) against direct LDLc measurement in Korean adults. This study included 23,757 subjects (51% male; median age, 51 years) from the 2009-2022 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. We developed the SSLE through multiple linear regression incorporating total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLc), triglycerides (TG), and sex. The validation metrics included Bland-Altman analysis for mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) and agreement of the categorization based on the NCEP ATP-III guidelines, assessed by sex and lipid subgroups. The derived SSLE equation was as follows: for TG < 200 mg/dL, LDLc = 0.963 × TC - 0.881 × HDLc - 0.111 × TG + 0.982 × Sex - 6.958; for TG ≥ 200 mg/dL, LDLc = 0.884 × TC - 0.646 × HDLc - 0.126 × TG + 3.742 × Sex - 3.214 (male = 1, female = 0). The MAPE was similar between males and females for the SSLE (4.6% for both) and ext-Martin-Hopkins (5.0% vs. 4.9%) but higher in males for the Sampson-NIH (5.4% vs. 4.9%) and Friedewald (7.6% vs. 5.7%). In the TG ≥ 400 mg/dL group, the MAPE increased progressively: SSLE (10.2%), ext-Martin-Hopkins (12.0%), Sampson-NIH (12.7%), and Friedewald (27.4%). In the LDLc < 70 mg/dL group, the MAPE was as follows: SSLE (8.0%), Sampson-NIH (8.6%), ext-Martin-Hopkins (9.7%), and Friedewald (12.8%). At TG 200-400 mg/dL, the SSLE revealed very good agreement (κ = 0.801) versus good agreement for other equations (ext-Martin-Hopkins κ = 0.794, Sampson-NIH κ = 0.782, Friedewald κ = 0.696). The novel SSLE demonstrated superior accuracy and agreement in Korean adults. Further validation studies across different ethnic populations are warranted.

References

. Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report. Circulation. 2002; 106(25):3143-421. View

Wang X, Magkos F, Mittendorfer B . Sex differences in lipid and lipoprotein metabolism: it's not just about sex hormones. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011; 96(4):885-93. PMC: 3070248. DOI: 10.1210/jc.2010-2061. View

Miller W, Myers G, Sakurabayashi I, Bachmann L, Caudill S, Dziekonski A . Seven direct methods for measuring HDL and LDL cholesterol compared with ultracentrifugation reference measurement procedures. Clin Chem. 2010; 56(6):977-86. PMC: 4687457. DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2009.142810. View

Martins J, Steyn N, Muller Rossouw H, Pillay T . Best practice for LDL-cholesterol: when and how to calculate. J Clin Pathol. 2023; 76(3):145-152. DOI: 10.1136/jcp-2022-208480. View

Sajja A, Park J, Sathiyakumar V, Varghese B, Pallazola V, Marvel F . Comparison of Methods to Estimate Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in Patients With High Triglyceride Levels. JAMA Netw Open. 2021; 4(10):e2128817. PMC: 8554644. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.28817. View

FRIEDEWALD W, Levy R, Fredrickson D . Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem. 1972; 18(6):499-502. View

Varlamov O, Bethea C, Roberts Jr C . Sex-specific differences in lipid and glucose metabolism. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2015; 5:241. PMC: 4298229. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2014.00241. View

Sampson M, Ling C, Sun Q, Harb R, Ashmaig M, Warnick R . A New Equation for Calculation of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in Patients With Normolipidemia and/or Hypertriglyceridemia. JAMA Cardiol. 2020; 5(5):540-548. PMC: 7240357. DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.0013. View

Schober P, Boer C, Schwarte L . Correlation Coefficients: Appropriate Use and Interpretation. Anesth Analg. 2018; 126(5):1763-1768. DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864. View

10.

Cohen J . Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull. 2009; 70(4):213-20. DOI: 10.1037/h0026256. View

11.

Cao J, Donato L, El-Khoury J, Goldberg A, Meeusen J, Remaley A . ADLM Guidance Document on the Measurement and Reporting of Lipids and Lipoproteins. J Appl Lab Med. 2024; 9(5):1040-1056. DOI: 10.1093/jalm/jfae057. View

12.

Lanjanian H, Najd Hassan Bonab L, Akbarzadeh M, Moazzam-Jazi M, Zahedi A, Masjoudi S . Sex, age, and ethnic dependency of lipoprotein variants as the risk factors of ischemic heart disease: a detailed study on the different age-classes and genders in Tehran Cardiometabolic Genetic Study (TCGS). Biol Sex Differ. 2022; 13(1):4. PMC: 8796330. DOI: 10.1186/s13293-022-00413-7. View

13.

Visseren F, Mach F, Smulders Y, Carballo D, Koskinas K, Back M . 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Eur Heart J. 2021; 42(34):3227-3337. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab484. View

14.

Vujovic A, Kotur-Stevuljevic J, Spasic S, Bujisic N, Martinovic J, Vujovic M . Evaluation of different formulas for LDL-C calculation. Lipids Health Dis. 2010; 9:27. PMC: 2847568. DOI: 10.1186/1476-511X-9-27. View

15.

Nauck M, Warnick G, Rifai N . Methods for measurement of LDL-cholesterol: a critical assessment of direct measurement by homogeneous assays versus calculation. Clin Chem. 2002; 48(2):236-54. View

16.

Yang H, Jeong H, Kim H, Lee S, Hur M . Sex-Specific Relationships between HDL-Cholesterol Levels and 10-Year Mortality in Individuals with Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: A Nationwide Cohort Study of South Koreans. Metabolites. 2023; 13(12). PMC: 10744622. DOI: 10.3390/metabo13121175. View

17.

Puavilai W, Laoragpongse D . Is calculated LDL-C by using the new modified Friedewald equation better than the standard Friedewald equation?. J Med Assoc Thai. 2004; 87(6):589-93. View

18.

Martin S, Blaha M, Elshazly M, Toth P, Kwiterovich P, Blumenthal R . Comparison of a novel method vs the Friedewald equation for estimating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels from the standard lipid profile. JAMA. 2013; 310(19):2061-8. PMC: 4226221. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2013.280532. View

19.

Khan M, Tul Ain Q, Nawaz A, Khan M, Sadiq F . Indirect calculation of LDL using thirteen equations in Pakistani population. Clin Chim Acta. 2022; 536:77-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2022.09.010. View

20.

Choi R, Park M, Oh Y, Kim S, Lee S, Lee E . Validation of multiple equations for estimating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in Korean adults. Lipids Health Dis. 2021; 20(1):111. PMC: 8453999. DOI: 10.1186/s12944-021-01525-6. View