Effects of a Distributed Form of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy for Clinical Application: The Keys Treatment Protocol

Overview

Journal Brain Sci

Publisher MDPI

Date 2025 Jan 24

PMID 39851454

Authors

Sarah Dos Anjos

Mary Bowman

David Morris

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background/aim: Currently, there are limited evidence-based protocols for improving upper extremity (UE) motor function after stroke. The Keys protocol, a distributed form of constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT), delivers CIMT components in fewer hours per day over an extended period, fitting outpatient rehabilitation schedules and third-party payor models. This pilot study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the Keys protocol in enhancing UE capacity and performance poststroke.

Methods: Ten adults with chronic stroke (>6 months) participated in an 8-week intervention. The protocol included 22 supervised training sessions (1.5 h each): 4 days/week for 4 weeks, 2 days/week for weeks 5-6, and 1 day/week for weeks 7-8. Participants wore a restraint mitt on the less-affected UE during waking hours and used an adapted transfer package. Outcome measures included the Motor Activity Log (MAL), Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT), Stroke Impact Scale (SIS), and Zung Depression Scale, assessed pre-treatment, mid-treatment (4 weeks), and posttreatment.

Results: Significant improvements were observed in SIS Strength, ADLs/IADLs, Mobility, and Hand Function domains, exceeding MCID thresholds. Memory and Communication domains improved significantly at the 3-month follow-up. WMFT performance times improved, with fewer incomplete tasks. MAL scores for Amount of Use and Quality of Movement increased across all time points. Depressive symptoms significantly decreased posttreatment.

Conclusions: The Keys protocol effectively improves UE use, motor function, mood, and quality of life, with the greatest gains observed mid-intervention. These findings support its feasibility and potential for outpatient stroke rehabilitation (ClinicalTrials.gov Registration: NCT05311384).

References

Dunstan D, Scott N . Clarification of the cut-off score for Zung's self-rating depression scale. BMC Psychiatry. 2019; 19(1):177. PMC: 6558728. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-019-2161-0. View

Hildebrand M, Geller D, Proffitt R . Occupational Therapy Practice Guidelines for Adults With Stroke. Am J Occup Ther. 2023; 77(5). DOI: 10.5014/ajot.2023.077501. View

Imoisili O, Chung A, Tong X, Hayes D, Loustalot F . Prevalence of Stroke - Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United States, 2011-2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2024; 73(20):449-455. PMC: 11115433. DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7320a1. View

Wolff A, Kwasnicki R, Farnebo S, Horwitz M . Dynamic assessment of the upper extremity: a review of available and emerging technologies. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2023; 48(5):404-411. DOI: 10.1177/17531934231153559. View

Morris D, Taub E, Mark V . Constraint-induced movement therapy: characterizing the intervention protocol. Eura Medicophys. 2006; 42(3):257-68. View

Kim G, Parnandi A, Eva S, Schambra H . The use of wearable sensors to assess and treat the upper extremity after stroke: a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil. 2021; 44(20):6119-6138. PMC: 9912423. DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1957027. View

Cahill L, Carey L, Mak-Yuen Y, McCluskey A, Neilson C, OConnor D . Factors influencing allied health professionals' implementation of upper limb sensory rehabilitation for stroke survivors: a qualitative study to inform knowledge translation. BMJ Open. 2021; 11(2):e042879. PMC: 7896620. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042879. View

Uswatte G, Taub E . Constraint-induced movement therapy: a method for harnessing neuroplasticity to treat motor disorders. Prog Brain Res. 2013; 207:379-401. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-63327-9.00015-1. View

Duncan P, Wallace D, Lai S, Johnson D, Embretson S, Laster L . The stroke impact scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke. 1999; 30(10):2131-40. DOI: 10.1161/01.str.30.10.2131. View

10.

Biggs J, Wylie L, Ziegler V . Validity of the Zung Self-rating Depression Scale. Br J Psychiatry. 1978; 132:381-5. DOI: 10.1192/bjp.132.4.381. View

11.

Duff S, He J, Nelsen M, Lane C, Rowe V, Wolf S . Interrater reliability of the Wolf Motor Function Test-Functional Ability Scale: why it matters. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014; 29(5):436-43. PMC: 4400190. DOI: 10.1177/1545968314553030. View

12.

Gao Q, Zhang Y, Long J, Pan M, Wang J, Yang F . Effect of different constraint-induced movement therapy protocols on recovery of stroke survivors with upper extremity dysfunction: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Int J Rehabil Res. 2023; 46(2):133-150. DOI: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000577. View

13.

Duncan P, Lai S, Bode R, Perera S, DeRosa J . Stroke Impact Scale-16: A brief assessment of physical function. Neurology. 2003; 60(2):291-6. DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000041493.65665.d6. View

14.

Winstein C, Stein J, Arena R, Bates B, Cherney L, Cramer S . Guidelines for Adult Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2016; 47(6):e98-e169. DOI: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000098. View

15.

van der Lee J, Beckerman H, Knol D, de Vet H, Bouter L . Clinimetric properties of the motor activity log for the assessment of arm use in hemiparetic patients. Stroke. 2004; 35(6):1410-4. DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.0000126900.24964.7e. View

16.

Pedlow K, Lennon S, Wilson C . Application of constraint-induced movement therapy in clinical practice: an online survey. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013; 95(2):276-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.08.240. View

17.

Sterr A, Elbert T, Berthold I, Kolbel S, Rockstroh B, Taub E . Longer versus shorter daily constraint-induced movement therapy of chronic hemiparesis: an exploratory study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002; 83(10):1374-7. DOI: 10.1053/apmr.2002.35108. View

18.

Taub E, Uswatte G, Mark V, Morris D, Barman J, Bowman M . Method for enhancing real-world use of a more affected arm in chronic stroke: transfer package of constraint-induced movement therapy. Stroke. 2013; 44(5):1383-8. PMC: 3703737. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000559. View

19.

Kwakkel G, Veerbeek J, van Wegen E, Wolf S . Constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke. Lancet Neurol. 2015; 14(2):224-34. PMC: 4361809. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70160-7. View

20.

Lin K, Fu T, Wu C, Wang Y, Liu J, Hsieh C . Minimal detectable change and clinically important difference of the Stroke Impact Scale in stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010; 24(5):486-92. DOI: 10.1177/1545968309356295. View