Evaluation of the Effects of the Third Molar on Distalization and the Effects of Attachments on Distalization and Expansion with Clear Aligners: Three-dimensional Finite Element Study

Overview

Journal Korean J Orthod

Date 2025 Jan 24

PMID 39849968

Authors

Aslihan Kuguoglu

Bengisu Akarsu-Guven

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of attachment design on maxillary molar distalization and simultaneous expansion during distalization, and the influence of third molars on distalization in the clear aligner technique using the finite element method.

Methods: Six models were created to evaluate three different attachment designs on the second molars. Model I: employed a vertical rectangular attachment; Model II: used a vertical rectangular attachment with the presence of the third molar; Model III: used a combined semi-elliptical attachment; and Model IV: featured an opposed semi-elliptical attachment with buccal and palatal components. Models I through IV focused on distalization. Models V and VI were created by adding expansions to Models III and IV. The displacement amounts, clear aligner deformations, and stress distributions were analyzed using Ansys 19.2.

Results: The presence of a third molar reduced maximum total displacement by 17%. Models I and III demonstrated similar distal displacement and tipping, both of which were more pronounced than in Model IV. Model IV achieved the most parallel tooth movement, with the least distal and buccal tipping and minimal distopalatal rotation. In the comparison of Models V and VI, Model VI exhibited greater distal and buccal displacements and more tipping than Model V.

Conclusions: The presence of a third molar reduced distalization efficiency and increased clear aligner deformation. For both movements, the attachment that provided the most parallel movement showed the least displacement. When selecting attachments, it is essential to consider factors such as tooth rotation, inclination, bone support, and root health.

References

Lione R, Balboni A, Di Fazio V, Pavoni C, Cozza P . Effects of pendulum appliance versus clear aligners in the vertical dimension during Class II malocclusion treatment: a randomized prospective clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2022; 22(1):441. PMC: 9552402. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-022-02483-w. View

Kinzinger G, Fritz U, Sander F, Diedrich P . Efficiency of a pendulum appliance for molar distalization related to second and third molar eruption stage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004; 125(1):8-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.02.002. View

Gomez J, Pena F, Martinez V, Giraldo D, Cardona C . Initial force systems during bodily tooth movement with plastic aligners and composite attachments: A three-dimensional finite element analysis. Angle Orthod. 2014; 85(3):454-60. PMC: 8612436. DOI: 10.2319/050714-330.1. View

Boyd R . Esthetic orthodontic treatment using the invisalign appliance for moderate to complex malocclusions. J Dent Educ. 2008; 72(8):948-67. View

Alansari R, Faydhi D, Ashour B, Alsaggaf D, Shuman M, Ghoneim S . Adult Perceptions of Different Orthodontic Appliances. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2019; 13:2119-2128. PMC: 6916694. DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S234449. View

Fujiyama K, Honjo T, Suzuki M, Matsuoka S, Deguchi T . Analysis of pain level in cases treated with Invisalign aligner: comparison with fixed edgewise appliance therapy. Prog Orthod. 2014; 15:64. PMC: 4240829. DOI: 10.1186/s40510-014-0064-7. View

Zhou N, Guo J . Efficiency of upper arch expansion with the Invisalign system. Angle Orthod. 2019; 90(1):23-30. PMC: 8087062. DOI: 10.2319/022719-151.1. View

Koc O, Pamukcu H, Atakan Kocabalkan A . Comparison of 3 different bone-borne type expansion appliances used in surgically-assisted rapid palatal expansion: A finite element analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2022; 163(3):e23-e33. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2022.12.001. View

Ayidaga C, Kamiloglu B . Effects of Variable Composite Attachment Shapes in Controlling Upper Molar Distalization with Aligners: A Nonlinear Finite Element Study. J Healthc Eng. 2021; 2021:5557483. PMC: 8397573. DOI: 10.1155/2021/5557483. View

10.

Liu L, Song Q, Zhou J, Kuang Q, Yan X, Zhang X . The effects of aligner overtreatment on torque control and intrusion of incisors for anterior retraction with clear aligners: A finite-element study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2022; 162(1):33-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.02.020. View

11.

Grunheid T, Loh C, Larson B . How accurate is Invisalign in nonextraction cases? Are predicted tooth positions achieved?. Angle Orthod. 2017; 87(6):809-815. PMC: 8317555. DOI: 10.2319/022717-147.1. View

12.

Kravitz N, Kusnoto B, BeGole E, Obrez A, Agran B . How well does Invisalign work? A prospective clinical study evaluating the efficacy of tooth movement with Invisalign. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 135(1):27-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.05.018. View

13.

Houle J, Piedade L, Todescan Jr R, Pinheiro F . The predictability of transverse changes with Invisalign. Angle Orthod. 2016; 87(1):19-24. PMC: 8388591. DOI: 10.2319/122115-875.1. View

14.

Buschang P, Shaw S, Ross M, Crosby D, Campbell P . Comparative time efficiency of aligner therapy and conventional edgewise braces. Angle Orthod. 2014; 84(3):391-6. PMC: 8667515. DOI: 10.2319/062113-466. View

15.

Alansari R . Youth Perception of Different Orthodontic Appliances. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020; 14:1011-1019. PMC: 7308181. DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S257814. View

16.

Karsli N, Ocak I, Akyildiz M, Gogen H, Dalci O . Evaluation of the effect of different attachment configurations on molar teeth in maxillary expansion with clear aligners - a finite element analysis. BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):921. PMC: 11316360. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-04544-8. View

17.

Rossini G, Parrini S, Castroflorio T, Deregibus A, Debernardi C . Efficacy of clear aligners in controlling orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review. Angle Orthod. 2014; 85(5):881-9. PMC: 8610387. DOI: 10.2319/061614-436.1. View

18.

Simon M, Keilig L, Schwarze J, Jung B, Bourauel C . Treatment outcome and efficacy of an aligner technique--regarding incisor torque, premolar derotation and molar distalization. BMC Oral Health. 2014; 14:68. PMC: 4068978. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6831-14-68. View

19.

Comba B, Parrini S, Rossini G, Castroflorio T, Deregibus A . A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Upper-Canine Distalization with Clear Aligners, Composite Attachments, and Class II Elastics. J Clin Orthod. 2017; 51(1):24-28. View

20.

Livas C, Pazhman F, Ilbeyli Z, Pandis N . Perceived esthetics and value of clear aligner therapy systems: A survey among dental school instructors and undergraduate students. Dental Press J Orthod. 2023; 28(3):e232225. PMC: 10365069. DOI: 10.1590/2177-6709.28.3.e232225.oar. View