» Articles » PMID: 39849481

Wound Irrigation and Peritoneal Lavage with Antiseptic/antibiotic Solution Before Wound Closure During Gastrointestinal Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Abstract

Background: Surgical site infections (SSIs) can affect mortality, morbidity, and medical costs. Although it has recently been reported that washing with antiseptic/antibiotic solution can prevent SSI in clean surgery, the clinical impact in gastrointestinal surgery is still uncertain. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of antiseptic/antibiotic solution during wound irrigation or peritoneal lavage in gastroenterological surgery.

Methods: The database search used PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library. The following inclusion criteria were set for the systematic review. 1) Studies comparing with or without antiseptic/antibiotic irrigation/lavage during gastrointestinal surgery. 2) Studies that described surgical site infections and adverse events. 3) Studies conducted after 2000.

Results: A total of 8 randomized controlled studies (RCTs) and 3 observational studies were included in this meta-analysis. Three RCTs of wound irrigation with povidone iodine (PVI) solution revealed no significant difference between the PVI and control groups [RR 1.41, 95% CI (0.92 to 2.17): p = 0.69]. Three RCTs of peritoneal lavage with antibiotic solution showed no significant difference between the interventional group and control groups [RR 0.39, 95% CI (0.10 to 1.55): p = 0.18]. Regarding other antiseptic or antibiotic solutions, the number of studies and participants were too small for evaluation.

Conclusion: Wound irrigation and peritoneal lavage with antiseptic/antibiotic solution did not have enough efficacy for preventing SSI during gastroenterological surgery.

References
1.
de Jonge S, Boldingh Q, Solomkin J, Allegranzi B, Egger M, Dellinger E . Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Evaluating Prophylactic Intra-Operative Wound Irrigation for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infections. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2017; 18(4):508-519. DOI: 10.1089/sur.2016.272. View

2.
Carballo Cuello C, Fernandez-de Thomas R, De Jesus O, de Jesus Espinosa A, Pastrana E . Prevention of Surgical Site Infection in Lumbar Instrumented Fusion Using a Sterile Povidone-Iodine Solution. World Neurosurg. 2021; 151:e700-e706. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.04.094. View

3.
McGowan J, Sampson M, Salzwedel D, Cogo E, Foerster V, Lefebvre C . PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016; 75:40-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.021. View

4.
Bi L, Yan B, Yang Q, Cui H . Peritoneal irrigation vs suction alone during pediatric appendectomy for perforated appendicitis: A meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019; 98(50):e18047. PMC: 6922395. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018047. View

5.
Emile S, Hossam Elfallal A, Abdel-Razik M, El-Said M, Elshobaky A . A randomized controlled trial on irrigation of open appendectomy wound with gentamicin- saline solution versus saline solution for prevention of surgical site infection. Int J Surg. 2020; 81:140-146. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.07.057. View