The Brussels Consensus for Non-invasive ICP Monitoring when Invasive Systems Are Not Available in the Care of TBI Patients (the B-ICONIC Consensus, Recommendations, and Management Algorithm)

Background: Invasive systems are commonly used for monitoring intracranial pressure (ICP) in traumatic brain injury (TBI) and are considered the gold standard. The availability of invasive ICP monitoring is heterogeneous, and in low- and middle-income settings, these systems are not routinely employed due to high cost or limited accessibility. The aim of this consensus was to develop recommendations to guide monitoring and ICP-driven therapies in TBI using non-invasive ICP (nICP) systems.

Methods: A panel of 41 experts, that regularly use nICP systems for guiding TBI care, was established. Three scoping and four systematic reviews with meta-analysis were performed summarizing the current global-literature evidence. A modified Delphi method was applied for the development of recommendations. An in-person meeting with group discussions and voting was conducted. Strong recommendations were defined for an agreement of at least 85%. Weak recommendations were defined for an agreement of 75-85%.

Results: A total of 34 recommendations were provided (32 Strong, 2 Weak) divided into three domains: general consideration for nICP use, management of ICP using nICP methods and thresholds of nICP tools for escalating/de-escalating treatment. We developed four clinical algorithms for escalating treatment and heatmaps for de-escalating treatment.

Conclusions: Using a mixed-method approach involving literature review and an in-person consensus by experts, a set of recommendations designed to assist clinicians managing TBI patients using nICP systems plus clinical assessment, in the presence or absence of brain imaging, were built. Further clinical studies are required to validate the potential use of these recommendations in the daily clinical practice.

References

Vik A, Nag T, Fredriksli O, Skandsen T, Moen K, Schirmer-Mikalsen K . Relationship of "dose" of intracranial hypertension to outcome in severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg. 2008; 109(4):678-84. DOI: 10.3171/JNS/2008/109/10/0678. View

Guiza F, Depreitere B, Piper I, Citerio G, Chambers I, Jones P . Visualizing the pressure and time burden of intracranial hypertension in adult and paediatric traumatic brain injury. Intensive Care Med. 2015; 41(6):1067-76. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-015-3806-1. View

Robba C, Graziano F, Rebora P, Elli F, Giussani C, Oddo M . Intracranial pressure monitoring in patients with acute brain injury in the intensive care unit (SYNAPSE-ICU): an international, prospective observational cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 2021; 20(7):548-558. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00138-1. View

Carney N, Totten A, OReilly C, Ullman J, Hawryluk G, Bell M . Guidelines for the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, Fourth Edition. Neurosurgery. 2016; 80(1):6-15. DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001432. View

Hawryluk G, Citerio G, Hutchinson P, Kolias A, Meyfroidt G, Robba C . Intracranial pressure: current perspectives on physiology and monitoring. Intensive Care Med. 2022; 48(10):1471-1481. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-022-06786-y. View

Chesnut R, Aguilera S, Buki A, Bulger E, Citerio G, Cooper D . A management algorithm for adult patients with both brain oxygen and intracranial pressure monitoring: the Seattle International Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Consensus Conference (SIBICC). Intensive Care Med. 2020; 46(5):919-929. PMC: 7210240. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-019-05900-x. View

Robba C, Graziano F, Guglielmi A, Rebora P, Galimberti S, Taccone F . Treatments for intracranial hypertension in acute brain-injured patients: grading, timing, and association with outcome. Data from the SYNAPSE-ICU study. Intensive Care Med. 2023; 49(1):50-61. PMC: 9852114. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-022-06937-1. View

Hawryluk G, Aguilera S, Buki A, Bulger E, Citerio G, Cooper D . A management algorithm for patients with intracranial pressure monitoring: the Seattle International Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Consensus Conference (SIBICC). Intensive Care Med. 2019; 45(12):1783-1794. PMC: 6863785. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-019-05805-9. View

Chesnut R, Temkin N, Carney N, Dikmen S, Rondina C, Videtta W . A trial of intracranial-pressure monitoring in traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med. 2012; 367(26):2471-81. PMC: 3565432. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1207363. View

10.

Chesnut R . Intracranial pressure monitoring: headstone or a new head start. The BEST TRIP trial in perspective. Intensive Care Med. 2013; 39(4):771-4. PMC: 3732471. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-013-2852-9. View

11.

Chesnut R, Temkin N, Videtta W, Petroni G, Lujan S, Pridgeon J . Consensus-Based Management Protocol (CREVICE Protocol) for the Treatment of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Based on Imaging and Clinical Examination for Use When Intracranial Pressure Monitoring Is Not Employed. J Neurotrauma. 2020; 37(11):1291-1299. PMC: 7249475. DOI: 10.1089/neu.2017.5599. View

12.

Chesnut R, Temkin N, Videtta W, Lujan S, Petroni G, Pridgeon J . Testing the Impact of Protocolized Care of Patients With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Without Intracranial Pressure Monitoring: The Imaging and Clinical Examination Protocol. Neurosurgery. 2023; 92(3):472-480. PMC: 10158870. DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002251. View

13.

Chesnut R, Temkin N, Videtta W, Lujan S, Petroni G, Pridgeon J . The Roles of Protocols and Protocolization in Improving Outcome From Severe Traumatic Brain Injury. Neurosurgery. 2023; . DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002777. View

14.

Brasil S, Chesnut R, Robba C . Noninvasive neuromonitoring in acute brain injured patients. Intensive Care Med. 2024; 50(6):960-963. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-024-07406-7. View

15.

Robba C, Goffi A, Geeraerts T, Cardim D, Via G, Czosnyka M . Brain ultrasonography: methodology, basic and advanced principles and clinical applications. A narrative review. Intensive Care Med. 2019; 45(7):913-927. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-019-05610-4. View

16.

Robba C, Wong A, Poole D, Al Tayar A, Arntfield R, Chew M . Basic ultrasound head-to-toe skills for intensivists in the general and neuro intensive care unit population: consensus and expert recommendations of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 2021; 47(12):1347-1367. PMC: 8596353. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-021-06486-z. View

17.

Robba C, Frigieri G, Brasil S, Taccone F . Early prognostic value of non-invasive intracranial pressure methods in brain-injured patients. Intensive Care Med. 2022; 48(12):1812-1814. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-022-06899-4. View

18.

Robba C, Santori G, Czosnyka M, Corradi F, Bragazzi N, Padayachy L . Optic nerve sheath diameter measured sonographically as non-invasive estimator of intracranial pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2018; 44(8):1284-1294. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-018-5305-7. View

19.

Oddo M, Sandroni C, Citerio G, Miroz J, Horn J, Rundgren M . Quantitative versus standard pupillary light reflex for early prognostication in comatose cardiac arrest patients: an international prospective multicenter double-blinded study. Intensive Care Med. 2018; 44(12):2102-2111. PMC: 6280828. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-018-5448-6. View

20.

Peluso L, Oddo M, Sandroni C, Citerio G, Taccone F . Early neurological pupil index to predict outcome after cardiac arrest. Intensive Care Med. 2022; 48(4):496-497. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-022-06646-9. View