Gender Differences in Early Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms: a Network Analysis

Overview

Journal Eur J Psychotraumatol

Date 2025 Jan 23

PMID 39846426

Authors

Line Ronning

Rachel L Zelkowitz

Marilyn L Piccirillo

Jianlin Liu

Jordan L Thomas

Jessy Guler

J Joana Kyei

Chris M Hoeboer

Jeanet F Karchoud

Miranda Olff

Anke B Witteveen

Mirjam van Zuiden

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Despite known gender/sex differences in the prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), potential differences in the associations among PTSD symptoms between men and women in the early post-trauma period are not well-characterized. This study utilized network analysis to assess potential differences in the associations among PTSD symptom clusters between men and women during the early post-trauma period. We included = 475 participants (57.5% self-identified women) who recently (≤2 months) experienced an interpersonal or motor vehicle potential traumatic event in the Netherlands. Past month PTSD symptoms were measured with the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) and composited according to the five-node PTSD symptom cluster dysphoric arousal model. We estimated the network as well as indices of centrality (strength and predictability) and assessed the stability of the modelled networks in subsamples of men (= 202) and women (= 273). We compared network structures using the Network Comparison Test (NCT). Results largely demonstrated adequate correlation stability for the estimated network structures for women and men. For both men and women, avoidance symptoms were among the strongest nodes with greatest predictability in the networks. In men, anxious arousal additionally showed high strength whereas re-experiencing showed high predictability. In women, re-experiencing symptoms demonstrated both high strength and predictability. The NCT demonstrated nonsignificant differences in global network structure (= 0.08, = .054) and strength ( = .073, = .067). Post hoc comparisons showed an association of re-experiencing symptoms with negative alterations in cognitions and mood in men but not women ( = .038, = .005). Results demonstrated possible modest gender differences in aspects of network structure although most elements of the network structure were similar across genders. These results help to characterize gender differences in associations among PTSD symptom clusters during the early post-trauma period, which may inform the potential relevance of future gender-sensitive early intervention strategies to ameliorate the risk for long-term PTSD.

References

Bryant R, Creamer M, ODonnell M, Forbes D, McFarlane A, Silove D . Acute and Chronic Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms in the Emergence of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Network Analysis. JAMA Psychiatry. 2016; 74(2):135-142. DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.3470. View

Hoeboer C, Karaban I, Karchoud J, Olff M, van Zuiden M . Validation of the PCL-5 in Dutch trauma-exposed adults. BMC Psychol. 2024; 12(1):456. PMC: 11351185. DOI: 10.1186/s40359-024-01951-y. View

van Borkulo C, van Bork R, Boschloo L, Kossakowski J, Tio P, Schoevers R . Comparing network structures on three aspects: A permutation test. Psychol Methods. 2022; 28(6):1273-1285. DOI: 10.1037/met0000476. View

Armour C, Fried E, Deserno M, Tsai J, Pietrzak R . A network analysis of DSM-5 posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms and correlates in U.S. military veterans. J Anxiety Disord. 2016; 45:49-59. DOI: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2016.11.008. View

Borsboom D, Cramer A . Network analysis: an integrative approach to the structure of psychopathology. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2013; 9:91-121. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185608. View

Constantin M, Schuurman N, Vermunt J . A general Monte Carlo method for sample size analysis in the context of network models. Psychol Methods. 2023; . DOI: 10.1037/met0000555. View

Blevins C, Weathers F, Davis M, Witte T, Domino J . The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5): Development and Initial Psychometric Evaluation. J Trauma Stress. 2015; 28(6):489-98. DOI: 10.1002/jts.22059. View

Stewart S, Khoury J, Watt M, Collins P, DeGrace S, Romero-Sanchiz P . Effects of sexual assault vs. other traumatic experiences on emotional and cannabis use outcomes in regular cannabis users with trauma histories: moderation by gender?. Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1386264. PMC: 11178137. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1386264. View

Bringmann L, Elmer T, Epskamp S, Krause R, Schoch D, Wichers M . What do centrality measures measure in psychological networks?. J Abnorm Psychol. 2019; 128(8):892-903. DOI: 10.1037/abn0000446. View

10.

Ehlers A, Clark D . A cognitive model of posttraumatic stress disorder. Behav Res Ther. 2000; 38(4):319-45. DOI: 10.1016/s0005-7967(99)00123-0. View

11.

Ferreira F, Gysi D, Castro D, Ferreira T . The nosographic structure of posttraumatic stress symptoms across trauma types: An exploratory network analysis approach. J Trauma Stress. 2022; 35(4):1115-1128. DOI: 10.1002/jts.22818. View

12.

Galatzer-Levy I, Bryant R . 636,120 Ways to Have Posttraumatic Stress Disorder. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015; 8(6):651-62. DOI: 10.1177/1745691613504115. View

13.

Gay N, Wisco B, Jones E, Murphy A . Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptom Network Structures: A Comparison Between Men and Women. J Trauma Stress. 2020; 33(1):96-105. DOI: 10.1002/jts.22470. View

14.

Langevin R, Beaudette S, Wadji D, Abou Chabake S, Gonzalez C, Jenkins D . Sex and gender considerations in cross-cultural traumatic stress studies. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2024; 15(1):2408194. PMC: 11485799. DOI: 10.1080/20008066.2024.2408194. View

15.

Roberts N, Kitchiner N, Kenardy J, Lewis C, Bisson J . Early psychological intervention following recent trauma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2019; 10(1):1695486. PMC: 6913678. DOI: 10.1080/20008198.2019.1695486. View

16.

Blekic W, Ben Taieb S, Kandana Arachchige K, Rossignol M, Schultebraucks K . Stress response and experiential avoidance among firefighters: Preliminary insights from network analyses. J Psychiatr Res. 2023; 165:132-139. PMC: 10546386. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2023.07.019. View

17.

de Ron J, Fried E, Epskamp S . Psychological networks in clinical populations: investigating the consequences of Berkson's bias. Psychol Med. 2019; 51(1):168-176. DOI: 10.1017/S0033291719003209. View

18.

Shalev A, Gevonden M, Ratanatharathorn A, Laska E, van der Mei W, Qi W . Estimating the risk of PTSD in recent trauma survivors: results of the International Consortium to Predict PTSD (ICPP). World Psychiatry. 2019; 18(1):77-87. PMC: 6313248. DOI: 10.1002/wps.20608. View

19.

Fullerton C, Ursano R, Epstein R, Crowley B, Vance K, KAO T . Gender differences in posttraumatic stress disorder after motor vehicle accidents. Am J Psychiatry. 2001; 158(9):1486-91. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.9.1486. View

20.

Haering S, Seligowski A, Linnstaedt S, Michopoulos V, House S, Beaudoin F . Disentangling sex differences in PTSD risk factors. Nat Ment Health. 2024; 2(5):605-615. PMC: 11556219. DOI: 10.1038/s44220-024-00236-y. View