» Articles » PMID: 39845863

Establishing an Imaging Protocol for Pediatric Trauma in a Rural Hospital

Overview
Journal Surg Pract Sci
Date 2025 Jan 23
PMID 39845863
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Rural hospitals cover 20% of the United States (US) population with only 10% of physician coverage. A mismatch exists in pediatric trauma resources as there is overwhelming trauma support concentrated in urban trauma centers. Well-established guidelines for evaluating pediatric trauma patients in resource-limited environments are currently not available. Herein we identify the imaging practices at a level III rural trauma center to establish a protocol for handling pediatric traumas.

Materials And Methods: The National Trauma Data Bank was used to identify 155 pediatric trauma patients (age <17 years) between 2017 and 2021. A single-center retrospective chart review was performed to identify patient demographics, mechanism of injury, imaging performed and pertinent imaging findings, and management of the patient i.e., whether they were discharged, admitted, or transferred.

Results: Blunt mechanisms were responsible for most traumas (90%). There were 64 patients (41.3%) who received imaging. Falls (49.3%) were the most common injury. Most of the patients were discharged home (73.4%) and 23.9% were transferred to a tertiary center. The mean time for transfer to a tertiary center was ∼176 min. The most frequently performed type of surgical intervention was orthopedic (59.3%).

Conclusion: An established pediatric trauma imaging protocol is warranted to adopt a higher level of pediatric trauma care for treatment and/or stabilization purposes. Using a tertiary care model and established pediatric trauma guidelines, we propose a model for use in resource-limited rural settings and aim to reduce unnecessary imaging of pediatric trauma patients and overall radiation exposure.

References
1.
Yue J, Upadhyayula P, Avalos L, Cage T . Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury in the United States: Rural-Urban Disparities and Considerations. Brain Sci. 2020; 10(3). PMC: 7139684. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci10030135. View

2.
Botelho F, Truche P, Mooney D, Caddell L, Zimmerman K, Roa L . Pediatric trauma primary survey performance among surgical and non-surgical pediatric providers in a Brazilian trauma center. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2020; 5(1):e000451. PMC: 7375395. DOI: 10.1136/tsaco-2020-000451. View

3.
Schears R, Farzal Z, Farzal Z, Fischer A . The radiation footprint on the pediatric trauma patient. Int J Emerg Med. 2018; 11(1):18. PMC: 5852158. DOI: 10.1186/s12245-018-0175-x. View

4.
Russell K, Biswas S . Pediatric trauma center vs. adult trauma center: which is better?. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2023; 36(2):159-162. DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000001245. View

5.
Menaker J, Blumberg S, Wisner D, Dayan P, Tunik M, Garcia M . Use of the focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) examination and its impact on abdominal computed tomography use in hemodynamically stable children with blunt torso trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014; 77(3):427-32. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000296. View