» Articles » PMID: 39845170

Integration of Effort for Secure Pancreaticoduodenectomy Improved Surgical Outcomes: Historical Observational Study

Overview
Journal Surg Pract Sci
Date 2025 Jan 23
PMID 39845170
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To study the impact of strategies focusing attention on the safety of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) on postoperative outcome.

Methods: Since 2012, tailored pancreaticoenterostomy, modification of stent insertion and organized drain management were applied according to risk for postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). Patients who performed PD after 2012 were enrolled into the prospective cohort, named experimental group (EG), and those who performed prior 2012 were enrolled into the historical control cohort (HG). Short term surgical outcomes were analyzed.

Results: HG included 90 patients and EG included 85 patients. Overall rate of Clinically relevant (CR)-POPF was 13.7% (24/175), 18.9% in HG (17/90) and 8.2% in EG (7/85), respectively (p=0.049). Postoperative delayed gastric emptying, rate of postoperative bleeding, length of hospital stay, and mortality rate did not show any difference between groups. Postoperative complications of Clavien-Dindo 3 or higher were significantly reduced in the EG (22.2% vs 8.2%, p=0.012).

Conclusions: After the application of a new surgical policy and management, CR-POPF rate and high-grade complication rate decreased by more than half.

References
1.
Narayanan S, Martin A, Turrentine F, Bauer T, Adams R, Zaydfudim V . Mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy: assessing early and late causes of patient death. J Surg Res. 2018; 231:304-308. PMC: 8246070. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.05.075. View

2.
Ghaferi A, Birkmeyer J, Dimick J . Complications, failure to rescue, and mortality with major inpatient surgery in medicare patients. Ann Surg. 2009; 250(6):1029-34. DOI: 10.1097/sla.0b013e3181bef697. View

3.
Rahbari N, Garden O, Padbury R, Maddern G, Koch M, Hugh T . Post-hepatectomy haemorrhage: a definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS). HPB (Oxford). 2011; 13(8):528-35. PMC: 3163274. DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2011.00319.x. View

4.
Kleespies A, Rentsch M, Seeliger H, Albertsmeier M, Jauch K, Bruns C . Blumgart anastomosis for pancreaticojejunostomy minimizes severe complications after pancreatic head resection. Br J Surg. 2009; 96(7):741-50. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.6634. View

5.
Sanchez-Velazquez P, Muller X, Malleo G, Park J, Hwang H, Napoli N . Benchmarks in Pancreatic Surgery: A Novel Tool for Unbiased Outcome Comparisons. Ann Surg. 2019; 270(2):211-218. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003223. View