Relational Integration Training Modulated the Frontoparietal Network for Fluid Intelligence: An EEG Microstates Study

Overview

Journal Brain Topogr

Date 2025 Jan 22

PMID 39843684

Authors

Zhidong Wang

Tie Sun

Feng Xiao

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Relational integration is a key subcomponent of working memory and a strong predictor of fluid intelligence. Both relational integration and fluid intelligence share a common neural foundation, particularly involving the frontoparietal network. This study utilized a randomized controlled experiment to examine the effect of relational integration training on brain networks using electroencephalogram (EEG) and microstate analysis. Participants were randomly assigned to either a relational integration training group (n = 29) or an active control group (n = 28) for one month. The Sandia matrices task assessed fluid intelligence, while rest-EEG was recorded during pre- and post-tests. Microstate analysis revealed that, for microstate D, the training group demonstrated a significant increase in occurrence and contribution following the intervention compared to the control group. Additionally, microstate D occurrence was negatively correlated with reaction times (RTs). Post-training, the training group showed a lower occurrence and contribution of microstate C compared to the control group. Regarding transfer probability, the training group exhibited a decrease between microstates A and B, and an increase between microstates C and D. In contrast, the control group showed increased transfer probability between microstates A, B, and C, and a decrease between microstate D and other microstates (B and A). These findings indicate that relational integration training influences frontoparietal networks associated with fluid intelligence. The current study suggests that relational integration training is an effective intervention for enhancing fluid intelligence.

References

Andrews G, Halford G, Chappell M, Maujean A, Shum D . Planning following stroke: a relational complexity approach using the tower of london. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015; 8:1032. PMC: 4274981. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.01032. View

Britz J, Van De Ville D, Michel C . BOLD correlates of EEG topography reveal rapid resting-state network dynamics. Neuroimage. 2010; 52(4):1162-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.02.052. View

Chuderski A . The relational integration task explains fluid reasoning above and beyond other working memory tasks. Mem Cognit. 2013; 42(3):448-63. PMC: 3969517. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-013-0366-x. View

Chuderski A . Fluid Intelligence Emerges from Representing Relations. J Intell. 2022; 10(3). PMC: 9396997. DOI: 10.3390/jintelligence10030051. View

Clark C, Lawlor-Savage L, Goghari V . Functional brain activation associated with working memory training and transfer. Behav Brain Res. 2017; 334:34-49. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.07.030. View

Covey T, Shucard J, Shucard D . Working memory training and perceptual discrimination training impact overlapping and distinct neurocognitive processes: Evidence from event-related potentials and transfer of training gains. Cognition. 2018; 182:50-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.08.012. View

Crone E, Wendelken C, Van Leijenhorst L, Honomichl R, Christoff K, Bunge S . Neurocognitive development of relational reasoning. Dev Sci. 2009; 12(1):55-66. PMC: 2614685. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00743.x. View

Delorme A, Makeig S . EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J Neurosci Methods. 2004; 134(1):9-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009. View

Douw L, Wakeman D, Tanaka N, Liu H, Stufflebeam S . State-dependent variability of dynamic functional connectivity between frontoparietal and default networks relates to cognitive flexibility. Neuroscience. 2016; 339:12-21. PMC: 5635855. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.09.034. View

10.

Duncan J . The multiple-demand (MD) system of the primate brain: mental programs for intelligent behaviour. Trends Cogn Sci. 2010; 14(4):172-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.01.004. View

11.

Halford G, Wilson W, Phillips S . Processing capacity defined by relational complexity: implications for comparative, developmental, and cognitive psychology. Behav Brain Sci. 1999; 21(6):803-31; discussion 831-64. DOI: 10.1017/s0140525x98001769. View

12.

Hojjati S, Ebrahimzadeh A, Khazaee A, Babajani-Feremi A . Predicting conversion from MCI to AD by integrating rs-fMRI and structural MRI. Comput Biol Med. 2018; 102:30-39. DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.09.004. View

13.

Holyoak K, Monti M . Relational Integration in the Human Brain: A Review and Synthesis. J Cogn Neurosci. 2020; 33(3):341-356. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_01619. View

14.

Jung R, Haier R . The Parieto-Frontal Integration Theory (P-FIT) of intelligence: converging neuroimaging evidence. Behav Brain Sci. 2007; 30(2):135-54. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X07001185. View

15.

Khanna A, Pascual-Leone A, Farzan F . Reliability of resting-state microstate features in electroencephalography. PLoS One. 2014; 9(12):e114163. PMC: 4257589. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114163. View

16.

Khazaee A, Ebrahimzadeh A, Babajani-Feremi A . Classification of patients with MCI and AD from healthy controls using directed graph measures of resting-state fMRI. Behav Brain Res. 2016; 322(Pt B):339-350. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2016.06.043. View

17.

Kleinert T, Koenig T, Nash K, Wascher E . On the Reliability of the EEG Microstate Approach. Brain Topogr. 2023; 37(2):271-286. PMC: 10884204. DOI: 10.1007/s10548-023-00982-9. View

18.

Koenig T, Prichep L, Lehmann D, Sosa P, Braeker E, Kleinlogel H . Millisecond by millisecond, year by year: normative EEG microstates and developmental stages. Neuroimage. 2002; 16(1):41-8. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1070. View

19.

Langer N, von Bastian C, Wirz H, Oberauer K, Jancke L . The effects of working memory training on functional brain network efficiency. Cortex. 2013; 49(9):2424-38. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2013.01.008. View

20.

Lawlor-Savage L, Clark C, Goghari V . No evidence that working memory training alters gray matter structure: A MRI surface -based analysis. Behav Brain Res. 2018; 360:323-340. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2018.12.008. View