» Articles » PMID: 39842930

Ecological Study of the Association Between the English National Vaccination Programme and Area Deprivation Inequalities in COVID-19 Mortality

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Date 2025 Jan 22
PMID 39842930
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To understand how area deprivation inequalities in COVID-19 mortality changed during the national vaccination programme in England and to identify the extent to which these inequalities might be explained by unequal vaccination uptake.

Design: Ecological study.

Setting: 307 Lower Tier Local Authorities in England, March 2020 - December 2022.

Main Outcome Measure: Inequality in age-standardised mortality rates 28 days after a positive COVID-19 test by area-level deprivation from March 2020 to December 2022. We employ three different measures of this inequality: the disparity index, the concentration and generalised concentration index, and absolute and relative measures of inequality. We use the 2019 edition of the Index of Multiple Deprivation, transformed into quintiles.

Results: Relative inequalities in age-standardised mortality rates 28 days after a positive COVID-19 test reduced substantially (from around 6.9 times higher in most deprived to least deprived to 1.2 times higher) in the 25 months after the national vaccination rollout began. Vaccination uptake between the most and least deprived quintiles widened with each dose. Inequalities in cumulative mortality rates developed quickly, and while they stabilised and reduced, they did not disappear. We estimate that if vaccination rates in the most deprived areas had been the same as those in the least deprived, absolute disparity inequality would have been reduced from 118.9 per 100 000 (95% CI 117.0 to 120.7) to 40.2 (95% CI 3.7 to 76.7) at the end of 2022.

Conclusions: National COVID-19 vaccination strategies offer the potential to significantly reduce inequalities in COVID-19 mortality rates. However, more could be achieved if barriers to vaccination uptake in the most deprived areas are overcome.

References
1.
Dolby T, Finning K, Baker A, Fowler-Dowd L, Khunti K, Razieh C . Monitoring sociodemographic inequality in COVID-19 vaccination uptake in England: a national linked data study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2022; 76(7):646-652. DOI: 10.1136/jech-2021-218415. View

2.
Sinclair D, Maharani A, Stow D, Welsh C, Matthews F . Can vaccination roll-out be more equitable if population risk is taken into account?. PLoS One. 2021; 16(11):e0259990. PMC: 8592495. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259990. View

3.
Todd A, Copeland A, Husband A, Kasim A, Bambra C . The positive pharmacy care law: an area-level analysis of the relationship between community pharmacy distribution, urbanity and social deprivation in England. BMJ Open. 2014; 4(8):e005764. PMC: 4156797. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005764. View

4.
Black M, Ford J, Lee A . Vaccination against COVID-19 and inequalities - Avoiding making a bad situation worse. Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2021; 2:100101. PMC: 7927589. DOI: 10.1016/j.puhip.2021.100101. View

5.
Albani V, Welsh C, Brown H, Matthews F, Bambra C . Explaining the deprivation gap in COVID-19 mortality rates: A decomposition analysis of geographical inequalities in England. Soc Sci Med. 2022; 311:115319. PMC: 9441468. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115319. View