» Articles » PMID: 39842920

Which Variables Are Associated with Recruitment Failure? A Nationwide Review on Obstetrical and Gynaecological Multicentre RCTs (2003-2023)

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Date 2025 Jan 22
PMID 39842920
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: We aim to assess which variables are associated with recruitment failure of obstetrical and gynaecological randomised controlled trials (RCTs), leading to an extension of the study period.

Design: Nationwide study.

Setting: A cohort of RCTs supported by the trial centre of the Dutch Consortium of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

Population: We included 83 RCTs that recruited patients between 1 March 2003 and 1 December 2023.

Main Outcome Measures: Main outcome was recruitment target not achieved within 6 months after the preplanned recruitment period. Secondary outcomes were recruitment target not achieved within an extension period of at least 12 months and premature termination of the trial. In all RCTs, we collected information on variables with a potential effect on recruitment failure, recorded at five levels; patient, doctor, participating centre, study organisation and study design.

Results: In total, 46 of 83 RCTs (55%) did not achieve their targeted recruitment within the preplanned study period with a maximal extension period of 6 months. The most relevant variables for recruitment failure in multivariable risk prediction modelling were presence of a no-treatment arm (where treatment is standard clinical practice), a compensation fee of less than €200 per included patient, funding of less than €350 000, while a preceding pilot study lowered this risk.

Conclusions: We identified that the presence of a no-treatment arm, low funding and a low compensation fee per included patient were the most relevant risk factors for recruitment failure within the preplanned period, while a preceding pilot study lowered this risk. Awareness of these variables is important when designing future studies.

References
1.
van Leijsen S, Kluivers K, Mol B, Hout J, Milani A, Roovers J . Value of urodynamics before stress urinary incontinence surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 121(5):999-1008. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31828c68e3. View

2.
van Leijsen S, Kluivers K, Mol B, Broekhuis S, Milani A, Bongers M . Can preoperative urodynamic investigation be omitted in women with stress urinary incontinence? A non-inferiority randomized controlled trial. Neurourol Urodyn. 2012; 31(7):1118-23. DOI: 10.1002/nau.22230. View

3.
Nijman T, van Vliet E, Naaktgeboren C, Oude Rengerink K, de Lange T, Bax C . Nifedipine versus placebo in the treatment of preterm prelabor rupture of membranes: a randomized controlled trial: Assessment of perinatal outcome by use of tocolysis in early labor-APOSTEL IV trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016; 205:79-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.08.024. View

4.
Landman A, de Boer M, Visser L, Nijman T, Hemels M, Naaktgeboren C . Evaluation of low-dose aspirin in the prevention of recurrent spontaneous preterm labour (the APRIL study): A multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. PLoS Med. 2022; 19(2):e1003892. PMC: 8806064. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003892. View

5.
van Zijl M, Koullali B, Naaktgeboren C, Schuit E, Bekedam D, Moll E . Pessary or Progesterone to Prevent Preterm delivery in women with short cervical length: the Quadruple P randomised controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017; 17(1):284. PMC: 5584011. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-017-1454-x. View