Progression of Lumbar Spine Degeneration After Laminectomy

Overview

Journal Cureus

Date 2025 Jan 22

PMID 39840186

Authors

Kunihiko Hashimoto

Kazuma Kitaguchi

Daisuke Tateiwa

Kazuya Oshima

Eiji Wada

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: Lumbar canal stenosis (LCS) is a common degenerative lumbar spinal disease (DLSD) widely treated by decompression surgery, also known as laminectomy. Few cases have been observed where DLSD has progressed postoperatively, thus requiring reoperation. However, data on such cases are limited.

Methods: We included 247 patients (148 men and 99 women; mean age = 73.3 years) with a mean follow-up of 2.3 years in this single-center retrospective study. Among them, 129 patients underwent bilateral partial laminectomy (BPL), 91 patients underwent lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy (LSPSL), and 27 underwent microendoscopic laminotomy (MEL).

Results: Of all the patients, 34 (13.8%) exhibited progression of lumbar spine degeneration symptoms, with nine (3.6%) requiring reoperation. Over 90% of new symptoms developed within one year of the initial surgery. Reoperation rates were significantly higher in patients with foraminal stenosis (P = <0.001). Additionally, 35 patients (14.2%) exhibited slippage progression. LSPSL resulted in significantly less slippage progression (P = 0.026). Spinal canal and foraminal stenosis were significantly associated with slippage progression (P< 0.001 and P = 0.010, respectively).

Conclusions: LSPSL reduced the incidence of canal and foraminal stenosis. Symptomatic DLSD was more common within one year post surgery, with foraminal stenosis more frequently requiring reoperation.

References

Bydon M, Macki M, Abt N, Sciubba D, Wolinsky J, Witham T . Clinical and surgical outcomes after lumbar laminectomy: An analysis of 500 patients. Surg Neurol Int. 2015; 6(Suppl 4):S190-3. PMC: 4431053. DOI: 10.4103/2152-7806.156578. View

Uehara M, Takahashi J, Hashidate H, Mukaiyama K, Kuraishi S, Shimizu M . Comparison of Spinous Process-Splitting Laminectomy versus Conventional Laminectomy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. Asian Spine J. 2015; 8(6):768-76. PMC: 4278982. DOI: 10.4184/asj.2014.8.6.768. View

SHENKIN H, Hash C . Spondylolisthesis after multiple bilateral laminectomies and facetectomies for lumbar spondylosis. Follow-up review. J Neurosurg. 1979; 50(1):45-7. DOI: 10.3171/jns.1979.50.1.0045. View

Jansson K, Nemeth G, Granath F, Blomqvist P . Spinal stenosis re-operation rate in Sweden is 11% at 10 years--a national analysis of 9,664 operations. Eur Spine J. 2005; 14(7):659-63. PMC: 3489214. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-004-0851-9. View

Rajasekaran S, Thomas A, Kanna R, Shetty A . Lumbar spinous process splitting decompression provides equivalent outcomes to conventional midline decompression in degenerative lumbar canal stenosis: a prospective, randomized controlled study of 51 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013; 38(20):1737-43. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a056c1. View

Javalkar V, Cardenas R, Tawfik T, Khan I, Bollam P, Banerjee A . Reoperations after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. World Neurosurg. 2011; 75(5-6):737-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2010.10.043. View

Minamide A, Yoshida M, Yamada H, Nakagawa Y, Kawai M, Maio K . Endoscope-assisted spinal decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013; 19(6):664-71. DOI: 10.3171/2013.8.SPINE13125. View

Adams M, Hutton W . The mechanical function of the lumbar apophyseal joints. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1983; 8(3):327-30. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198304000-00017. View

Eule J, Breeze R, Kindt G . Bilateral partial laminectomy: a treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis and midline disc herniation. Surg Neurol. 1999; 52(4):329-37; discussion 337-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0090-3019(99)00102-0. View

10.

Horan J, Husien M, Bolger C . Bilateral laminotomy through a unilateral approach (minimally invasive) versus open laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis. Br J Neurosurg. 2020; 35(2):161-165. DOI: 10.1080/02688697.2020.1777253. View

11.

Voglis S, Tosic L, Hobner L, Hofer A, Stienen M, Regli L . Spinous-Process-Splitting Versus Conventional Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Comparative Study with Respect to Short-Term Postoperative Pain and Analgesics Use. World Neurosurg. 2022; 160:e80-e87. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.12.094. View

12.

Sihvonen T, Herno A, Paljarvi L, Airaksinen O, Partanen J, Tapaninaho A . Local denervation atrophy of paraspinal muscles in postoperative failed back syndrome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993; 18(5):575-81. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199304000-00009. View

13.

Hellum C, Rekeland F, Smastuen M, Solberg T, Hermansen E, Storheim K . Surgery in degenerative spondylolisthesis: does fusion improve outcome in subgroups? A secondary analysis from a randomized trial (NORDSTEN trial). Spine J. 2023; 23(11):1613-1622. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.06.386. View

14.

Takenaka S, Tateishi K, Hosono N, Mukai Y, Fuji T . Preoperative retrolisthesis as a risk factor of postdecompression lumbar disc herniation. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015; 24(4):592-601. DOI: 10.3171/2015.6.SPINE15288. View

15.

Kao F, Hsu Y, Wang C, Tu Y, Liu P . Short-term and long-term revision rates after lumbar spine discectomy versus laminectomy: a population-based cohort study. BMJ Open. 2018; 8(7):e021028. PMC: 6059274. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021028. View

16.

Lai P, Chen L, Niu C, Fu T, Chen W . Relation between laminectomy and development of adjacent segment instability after lumbar fusion with pedicle fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004; 29(22):2527-32. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000144408.02918.20. View

17.

Yuce I, Kahyaoglu O, Cavusoglu H, Cavusoglu H, Aydin Y . Long-Term Clinical Outcome and Reoperation Rate for Microsurgical Bilateral Decompression via Unilateral Approach of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. World Neurosurg. 2019; 125:e465-e472. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.105. View

18.

Nomura K, Yoshida M . Microendoscopic Decompression Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis via the Paramedian Approach: Preliminary Results. Global Spine J. 2013; 2(2):87-94. PMC: 3864472. DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1319774. View

19.

Elmose S, Andersen G, Carreon L, Sigmundsson F, Andersen M . Radiological Definitions of Sagittal Plane Segmental Instability in the Degenerative Lumbar Spine - A Systematic Review. Global Spine J. 2022; 13(2):523-533. PMC: 9972266. DOI: 10.1177/21925682221099854. View

20.

Katz J, Lipson S, Larson M, McInnes J, Fossel A, Liang M . The outcome of decompressive laminectomy for degenerative lumbar stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991; 73(6):809-16. View