» Articles » PMID: 39837568

Exposure to Drinking Water Trihalomethanes and Risk of Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Epidemiologic Evidence and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis

Overview
Date 2025 Jan 21
PMID 39837568
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Chlorination is a widespread method for drinking water disinfection that has the drawback of introducing potentially carcinogenic chemical by-products to drinking water.

Objective: We systematically evaluated the epidemiologic evidence of exposure to trihalomethane (THM) disinfection by-products and risk of cancer.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies that assessed the association of exposure to residential concentrations of THMs with risk of cancer in adults. A protocol was preregistered in PROSPERO (CRD42023435491). PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane were searched for publications up to April 2024. Study selection and risk of bias appraisal using the National Toxicology Program Office of Health Assessment and Translation (NTP OHAT) tool was done in duplicate. Summary risk estimates were assessed using random effects meta-analysis and one-stage dose-response meta-analysis.

Results: The literature search resulted in 2,022 records, of which 29 publications assessing 14 different cancers were eligible for inclusion. Summary relative risks (RRs) were estimated for bladder cancer and colorectal cancer based on 5,860 and 9,262 cases and 84,371 and 90,272 participants, respectively. The summary RR of bladder cancer for the highest exposed compared with the lowest was 1.33 (95% CI: 1.04, 1.71), and in the dose-response analysis, RRs were statistically significant above THM concentrations of . For colorectal cancer, the summary RR was 1.15 (95% CI: 1.07, 1.24).

Conclusion: According to the World Cancer Research Fund criteria, we found limited-suggestive evidence that THM in drinking water increases the risk of bladder and colorectal cancer at levels below current regulatory limits in the US and EU, indicating that these fail to protect against cancer in the general population. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP14505.

Citing Articles

Invited Perspective: Drinking Water Disinfection By-Products and Cancer-A Historical Perspective.

Villanueva C Environ Health Perspect. 2025; 133(1):11303.

PMID: 39837569 PMC: 11750417. DOI: 10.1289/EHP16443.

References
1.
Rahman M, Driscoll T, Cowie C, Armstrong B . Disinfection by-products in drinking water and colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Int J Epidemiol. 2010; 39(3):733-45. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyp371. View

2.
Wilkins 3rd J, Comstock G . Source of drinking water at home and site-specific cancer incidence in Washington County, Maryland. Am J Epidemiol. 1981; 114(2):178-90. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113181. View

3.
Doyle T, Zheng W, Cerhan J, Hong C, Sellers T, Kushi L . The association of drinking water source and chlorination by-products with cancer incidence among postmenopausal women in Iowa: a prospective cohort study. Am J Public Health. 1997; 87(7):1168-76. PMC: 1380892. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.87.7.1168. View

4.
Quist A, Inoue-Choi M, Weyer P, Anderson K, Cantor K, Krasner S . Ingested nitrate and nitrite, disinfection by-products, and pancreatic cancer risk in postmenopausal women. Int J Cancer. 2017; 142(2):251-261. PMC: 5788281. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.31055. View

5.
Doshi B, Athans S, Woloszynska A . Biological differences underlying sex and gender disparities in bladder cancer: current synopsis and future directions. Oncogenesis. 2023; 12(1):44. PMC: 10477245. DOI: 10.1038/s41389-023-00489-9. View