» Articles » PMID: 39834747

The Relationship Between Preferred Learning Styles and Academic Achievement of Undergraduate Health Sciences Students Compared to Other Disciplines at a Middle Eastern University Utilizing the VARK Instrument

Overview
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Date 2025 Jan 21
PMID 39834747
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Learning style denotes a learner's approach to acquiring, processing, interpreting, organizing, and contemplating information. VARK, formulated by Fleming and Mills (1992), assesses learning styles: Visual (V), Aural (A), Reading/Writing (R), and Kinesthetic (K). Visual learners prefer observing; Aural learners favor listening to lectures; Reading/Writing learners engage through texts and notes; Kinesthetic learners benefit from tactile activities.

Purpose: To compare learning style preferences of undergraduate health sciences students with other disciplines and examine the relationship between VARK scores and academic performance.

Methods: A cross-sectional study of 347 undergraduate students recorded demographic data and responses to the Arabic version of the VARK questionnaire. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 27 which included descriptive and inferential statistics.

Results: Unimodal preferences were most common, ranging from 47.4% to 51.4% in the College of Health Sciences and 11.8% to 15.0% in the College of Law as the least. Quadmodal preferences were rare but more frequent in Health Sciences and Engineering. Auditory (A) was the most preferred unimodal style (Mean/SD - 3.72/2.181), while kinesthetic (Mean/SD - 0.54/.864) was the least preferred. Mann-Whitney -test results indicated Health Sciences students scored higher in K ( = -4.558, p<0.001) and total VARK scores ( = -3.633, p<0.001). There was a statistically significant difference in CGPA between unimodal and multimodal learners ( = -2.150, p=0.032), with unimodal learners ranking lower.

Conclusion: The findings suggest that multimodal learners outperformed unimodal learners, even though unimodal learners constituted a larger group. The Health Sciences and Engineering students exhibited marginally higher Quadmodal learning preferences than other disciplines, indicating the need for comprehensive and engaging learning experiences. These results have practical implications for educators, who should consider learning styles to enhance teaching strategies, address unique student challenges, and create an inclusive educational environment.

References
1.
Al-Khayat M, Mohammad M, Hayat M . Learning styles for medical students: is it as simple as it seems? [Letter]. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2019; 10:139-140. PMC: 6475114. DOI: 10.2147/AMEP.S202251. View

2.
Parashar R, Hulke S, Pakhare A . Learning styles among first professional northern and central India medical students during digitization. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2018; 10:1-5. PMC: 6305127. DOI: 10.2147/AMEP.S182790. View

3.
Sarabi-Asiabar A, Jafari M, Sadeghifar J, Tofighi S, Zaboli R, Peyman H . The relationship between learning style preferences and gender, educational major and status in first year medical students: a survey study from iran. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2015; 17(1):e18250. PMC: 4341501. DOI: 10.5812/ircmj.18250. View

4.
Mozaffari H, Janatolmakan M, Sharifi R, Ghandinejad F, Andayeshgar B, Khatony A . The Relationship Between the VARK Learning Styles and Academic Achievement in Dental Students. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2020; 11:15-19. PMC: 6955605. DOI: 10.2147/AMEP.S235002. View

5.
Li L, Abdul Rahman S . Students' learning style detection using tree augmented naive Bayes. R Soc Open Sci. 2018; 5(7):172108. PMC: 6083720. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.172108. View