Engagement in a Web-based Intervention for Individuals Who Committed Sexual Offenses Against Children: Observational Study

Overview

Journal BMC Psychol

Publisher Biomed Central

Date 2025 Jan 20

PMID 39833921

Authors

Sonja Schroder

Safiye Tozdan

Peer Briken

Jurgen L Muller

Peter Fromberger

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Web-based interventions have been shown to be effective for various health and mental health problems. However, the effectiveness of interventions is often limited by the fact that individuals do not start or complete them. Using data from an intermediate analysis of the randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial to evaluate the effectiveness of @myTabu, the current study investigated engagement with a web-based intervention for 113 individuals convicted of child sexual abuse and/or for child sexual exploitation material. @myTabu is a human-supported, web-based intervention for individuals who have been convicted for sexual abuse of children or the use of child sexual exploitation material with the goal of reducing the risk factors for recidivism and actual recidivism. The results of the present study indicate that (a) 81% of the participants logged into the web-based intervention within 8 weeks after login credentials were sent; (b) there was a trend toward lower treatment readiness and lower belief in their own technical prerequisites in individuals who did not login; (c) 15% of the participants completed all requested sessions within the first 5 weeks of participation, and the average participant logged in on 6 different days and completed two sessions; (d) the number of login days and completed sessions could be predicted by treatment readiness. We discuss these findings and their implications for the development and implementation of further web-based interventions in the forensic context. Trial registration: German Clinical Trial Register (DRKS00021256). Prospectively registered 24.04.2020.

References

Wilson E, Lankton N . Modeling patients' acceptance of provider-delivered e-health. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004; 11(4):241-8. PMC: 436070. DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M1475. View

Lin J, Faust B, Ebert D, Kramer L, Baumeister H . A Web-Based Acceptance-Facilitating Intervention for Identifying Patients' Acceptance, Uptake, and Adherence of Internet- and Mobile-Based Pain Interventions: Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2018; 20(8):e244. PMC: 6123541. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.9925. View

Ryan C, Bergin M, Wells J . Theoretical Perspectives of Adherence to Web-Based Interventions: a Scoping Review. Int J Behav Med. 2017; 25(1):17-29. DOI: 10.1007/s12529-017-9678-8. View

Lattie E, Schueller S, Sargent E, Stiles-Shields C, Tomasino K, Corden M . Uptake and Usage of IntelliCare: A Publicly Available Suite of Mental Health and Well-Being Apps. Internet Interv. 2016; 4(2):152-158. PMC: 4936531. DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2016.06.003. View

Wakeling H, Howard P, Barnett G . Comparing the validity of the RM2000 scales and OGRS3 for predicting recidivism by Internet sexual offenders. Sex Abuse. 2011; 23(1):146-68. DOI: 10.1177/1079063210375974. View

Linardon J, Fuller-Tyszkiewicz M . Attrition and adherence in smartphone-delivered interventions for mental health problems: A systematic and meta-analytic review. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2019; 88(1):1-13. DOI: 10.1037/ccp0000459. View

Rollnick S, Heather N, Gold R, Hall W . Development of a short 'readiness to change' questionnaire for use in brief, opportunistic interventions among excessive drinkers. Br J Addict. 1992; 87(5):743-54. DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1992.tb02720.x. View

Fromberger P, Schroder S, Bauer L, Siegel B, Tozdan S, Briken P . @myTabu-A Placebo Controlled Randomized Trial of a Guided Web-Based Intervention for Individuals Who Sexually Abused Children and Individuals Who Consumed Child Sexual Exploitation Material: A Clinical Study Protocol. Front Psychiatry. 2021; 11:575464. PMC: 7820175. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.575464. View

Kooij L, Groen W, van Harten W . The Effectiveness of Information Technology-Supported Shared Care for Patients With Chronic Disease: A Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res. 2017; 19(6):e221. PMC: 5500776. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.7405. View

10.

Schroder S, Buntrock C, Neumann L, Muller J, Fromberger P . Acceptance of a Web-Based Intervention in Individuals Who Committed Sexual Offenses Against Children: Cross-Sectional Study. JMIR Form Res. 2024; 8:e48880. PMC: 10858427. DOI: 10.2196/48880. View

11.

Eisinga R, Te Grotenhuis M, Pelzer B . The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown?. Int J Public Health. 2012; 58(4):637-42. DOI: 10.1007/s00038-012-0416-3. View

12.

Viskovich S, Pakenham K . Pilot evaluation of a web-based acceptance and commitment therapy program to promote mental health skills in university students. J Clin Psychol. 2018; 74(12):2047-2069. DOI: 10.1002/jclp.22656. View

13.

Hedman E, Furmark T, Carlbring P, Ljotsson B, Ruck C, Lindefors N . A 5-Year follow-up of internet-based cognitive behavior therapy for social anxiety disorder. J Med Internet Res. 2011; 13(2):e39. PMC: 3221374. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1776. View

14.

Baumeister H, Nowoczin L, Lin J, Seifferth H, Seufert J, Laubner K . Impact of an acceptance facilitating intervention on diabetes patients' acceptance of Internet-based interventions for depression: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014; 105(1):30-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2014.04.031. View

15.

Sin J, Galeazzi G, McGregor E, Collom J, Taylor A, Barrett B . Digital Interventions for Screening and Treating Common Mental Disorders or Symptoms of Common Mental Illness in Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2020; 22(9):e20581. PMC: 7495259. DOI: 10.2196/20581. View

16.

Barak A, Klein B, Proudfoot J . Defining internet-supported therapeutic interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2009; 38(1):4-17. DOI: 10.1007/s12160-009-9130-7. View

17.

Philippi P, Baumeister H, Apolinario-Hagen J, Ebert D, Hennemann S, Kott L . Acceptance towards digital health interventions - Model validation and further development of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. Internet Interv. 2021; 26:100459. PMC: 8463857. DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100459. View

18.

Beatty L, Binnion C . A Systematic Review of Predictors of, and Reasons for, Adherence to Online Psychological Interventions. Int J Behav Med. 2016; 23(6):776-794. DOI: 10.1007/s12529-016-9556-9. View

19.

Richards D, Richardson T . Computer-based psychological treatments for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2012; 32(4):329-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2012.02.004. View

20.

Baumeister H, Seifferth H, Lin J, Nowoczin L, Luking M, Ebert D . Impact of an Acceptance Facilitating Intervention on Patients' Acceptance of Internet-based Pain Interventions: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Clin J Pain. 2014; 31(6):528-35. DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000118. View