Efficient Gene Editing of Pig Embryos by Combining Electroporation and Lipofection

Overview

Journal Vet World

Date 2025 Jan 20

PMID 39829671

Authors

Qingyi Lin

Nanaka Torigoe

Bin Liu

Yuichiro Nakayama

Aya Nakai

Zhao Namula

Megumi Nagahara

Fuminori Tanihara

Maki Hirata

Takeshige Otoi

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background And Aim: Mosaicism, which is characterized by the presence of wild-type and more than one mutant allele, poses a serious problem in zygotic gene modification through the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein 9 system. Therefore, we used pig embryos to compare the gene editing efficiencies achieved by combining electroporation and lipofection using different aminopeptidase N (APN)-targeting guide RNA (gRNA) sequences.

Materials And Methods: Six gRNAs (gRNA1-6) with different target sequences were designed to target APN. (ZP)-intact zygotes collected 10 h after the start of fertilization (IVF) were electroporated with each gRNA to compare their gene editing efficiency. The gRNA sequences that achieved the lowest and highest mutation rates (gRNA4 and gRNA6, respectively) were selected for additional lipofection to assess gene editing efficiency following combined treatment. As ZP removal is essential for lipofection, ZP-free zygotes were electroporated with gRNA4 or gRNA6 10 h after IVF initiation, followed by lipofection with the same gRNAs 24 or 29 h after IVF initiation. The electroporated ZP-intact and ZP-free zygotes were used as controls.

Results: gRNA4 and gRNA6 exhibited the lowest and highest mutation rates, respectively. gRNA4-targeted ZP-free embryos subjected to additional lipofection 29 h after IVF initiation exhibited significantly higher total and biallelic mutation rates than ZP-intact embryos that received only electroporation. Additional lipofection of gRNA6-targeted embryos had no obvious effect on mutation rates.

Conclusion: Electroporation combined with lipofection using gRNAs with low mutation rates may improve gene editing efficiency in pig embryos. However, the effects may vary based on the timing of gene editing.

References

Tanihara F, Hirata M, Thi Nguyen N, Le Q, Wittayarat M, Fahrudin M . Generation of edited pig via electroporation of the CRISPR/Cas9 system into porcine fertilized zygotes. Anim Biotechnol. 2019; 32(2):147-154. DOI: 10.1080/10495398.2019.1668801. View

Brinkman E, Chen T, Amendola M, van Steensel B . Easy quantitative assessment of genome editing by sequence trace decomposition. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014; 42(22):e168. PMC: 4267669. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gku936. View

Pineiro-Silva C, Gadea J . Optimization of lipofection protocols for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery in porcine zona pellucida intact oocytes: A study of coincubation duration and reagent efficacy. Theriogenology. 2024; 230():121-129. DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2024.09.014. View

Lin Q, Le Q, Takebayashi K, Thongkittidilok C, Wittayarat M, Hirata M . Timing and duration of lipofection-mediated CRISPR/Cas9 delivery into porcine zygotes affect gene-editing events. BMC Res Notes. 2021; 14(1):389. PMC: 8502333. DOI: 10.1186/s13104-021-05800-8. View

Tanihara F, Hirata M, Otoi T . Current status of the application of gene editing in pigs. J Reprod Dev. 2021; 67(3):177-187. PMC: 8238678. DOI: 10.1262/jrd.2021-025. View

Burkard C, Lillico S, Reid E, Jackson B, Mileham A, Ait-Ali T . Precision engineering for PRRSV resistance in pigs: Macrophages from genome edited pigs lacking CD163 SRCR5 domain are fully resistant to both PRRSV genotypes while maintaining biological function. PLoS Pathog. 2017; 13(2):e1006206. PMC: 5322883. DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006206. View

Cradick T, Qiu P, Lee C, Fine E, Bao G . COSMID: A Web-based Tool for Identifying and Validating CRISPR/Cas Off-target Sites. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2014; 3:e214. PMC: 4272406. DOI: 10.1038/mtna.2014.64. View

Hyttel P, Laurincik J, Rosenkranz C, Rath D, Niemann H, Ochs R . Nucleolar proteins and ultrastructure in preimplantation porcine embryos developed in vivo. Biol Reprod. 2000; 63(6):1848-56. DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod63.6.1848. View

Lin Q, Takebayashi K, Torigoe N, Liu B, Namula Z, Hirata M . Evaluation of culture methods and chemical reagent combinations on CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing systems by lipofection in pig zygotes. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 2024; 60(7):725-731. DOI: 10.1007/s11626-024-00908-0. View

10.

Zhang Q, Hu R, Tang X, Wu C, He Q, Zhao Z . Occurrence and investigation of enteric viral infections in pigs with diarrhea in China. Arch Virol. 2013; 158(8):1631-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00705-013-1659-x. View

11.

Whitworth K, Rowland R, Petrovan V, Sheahan M, Cino-Ozuna A, Fang Y . Resistance to coronavirus infection in amino peptidase N-deficient pigs. Transgenic Res. 2018; 28(1):21-32. PMC: 6353812. DOI: 10.1007/s11248-018-0100-3. View

12.

Takebayashi K, Wittayarat M, Lin Q, Hirata M, Yoshimura N, Torigoe N . Gene editing in porcine embryos using a combination of electroporation and transfection methods. Reprod Domest Anim. 2022; 57(10):1136-1142. DOI: 10.1111/rda.14184. View

13.

Hou N, Du X, Wu S . Advances in pig models of human diseases. Animal Model Exp Med. 2022; 5(2):141-152. PMC: 9043727. DOI: 10.1002/ame2.12223. View

14.

Luo L, Wang S, Zhu L, Fan B, Liu T, Wang L . Aminopeptidase N-null neonatal piglets are protected from transmissible gastroenteritis virus but not porcine epidemic diarrhea virus. Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):13186. PMC: 6742759. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-49838-y. View

15.

Yue H, Zhou X, Cheng M, Xing D . Graphene oxide-mediated Cas9/sgRNA delivery for efficient genome editing. Nanoscale. 2017; 10(3):1063-1071. DOI: 10.1039/c7nr07999k. View

16.

Hirata M, Wittayarat M, Namula Z, Le Q, Lin Q, Takebayashi K . Lipofection-Mediated Introduction of CRISPR/Cas9 System into Porcine Oocytes and Embryos. Animals (Basel). 2021; 11(2). PMC: 7926877. DOI: 10.3390/ani11020578. View

17.

Namula Z, Hirata M, Le Q, Lin Q, Takebayashi K, Yoshimura N . Zona pellucida treatment before CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing of porcine zygotes. Vet Med Sci. 2021; 8(1):164-169. PMC: 8788957. DOI: 10.1002/vms3.659. View

18.

Ostrup O, Olbricht G, Ostrup E, Hyttel P, Collas P, Cabot R . RNA profiles of porcine embryos during genome activation reveal complex metabolic switch sensitive to in vitro conditions. PLoS One. 2013; 8(4):e61547. PMC: 3639270. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061547. View

19.

Wang F, Wang L, Zou X, Duan S, Li Z, Deng Z . Advances in CRISPR-Cas systems for RNA targeting, tracking and editing. Biotechnol Adv. 2019; 37(5):708-729. DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2019.03.016. View

20.

Torchilin V, Levchenko T, Rammohan R, Volodina N, Papahadjopoulos-Sternberg B, DSouza G . Cell transfection in vitro and in vivo with nontoxic TAT peptide-liposome-DNA complexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100(4):1972-7. PMC: 149943. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0435906100. View