» Articles » PMID: 3982962

Correlation of Sinus Slowing and Hyperpolarization Caused by Adenosine in Sinus Node

Overview
Journal Pflugers Arch
Specialty Physiology
Date 1985 Jan 1
PMID 3982962
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The effect of adenosine on sinus node cells was examined in a preparation that precluded pacemaker shift. It was found that adenosine produced a dose-dependent slowing in rate. In examining the effects on the action potential parameters (n = 10), adenosine caused a significant increase in the maximum diastolic potential (control = -62 +/- 2 mV, adenosine, 1 X 10(-4) M, = -67 +/- 3 mV) and a significant increase in the rate of rise of the action potential (control = 3.3 +/- 0.6 V/s, adenosine, 1 X 10(-4) M, = 7.2 +/- 2 V/s). There was only a slight shortening of the action potential duration and a small increase in the action potential overshoot. Adenosine caused a significant decrease in the rate of diastolic depolarization (control = 100 +/- 19 mV/s, adenosine, 1 X 10(-4) M, = 42 +/- 5 mV/s). Acetylcholine caused similar effects. The effects of adenosine were not affected by atropine or propranolol but were antagonized by aminophylline, an adenosine competitive antagonist. In another set of experiments (n = 12) we sought to understand further the mechanism of sinus slowing caused by adenosine and compare with the effects of acetylcholine. The increase in cycle length due to different doses of adenosine and acetylcholine was measured. The preparation was then arrested with D-600 or NiCl2. The cells were then exposed to the same concentrations of adenosine and acetylcholine and the amount of hyperpolarization from the resting potential (means = -40 +/- 4 mV) was measured. The change in cycle length and amount of hyperpolarization were linearly correlated (r = 0.86).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Citing Articles

Adenosine reduces sinoatrial node cell action potential firing rate by uncoupling its membrane and calcium clocks.

Wirth A, Tsutsui K, Maltsev V, Lakatta E Front Physiol. 2022; 13:977807.

PMID: 36505046 PMC: 9730041. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2022.977807.


Unmasking Adenosine: The Purinergic Signalling Molecule Critical to Arrhythmia Pathophysiology and Management.

Matthews G, Grace A Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2020; 8(4):240-248.

PMID: 32685154 PMC: 7358948. DOI: 10.15420/aer.2019.05.


Neurohumoral Control of Sinoatrial Node Activity and Heart Rate: Insight From Experimental Models and Findings From Humans.

MacDonald E, Rose R, Quinn T Front Physiol. 2020; 11:170.

PMID: 32194439 PMC: 7063087. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00170.


Redundant and diverse intranodal pacemakers and conduction pathways protect the human sinoatrial node from failure.

Li N, Hansen B, Csepe T, Zhao J, Ignozzi A, Sul L Sci Transl Med. 2017; 9(400).

PMID: 28747516 PMC: 5775890. DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aam5607.


Ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes.

Ren Q, Ren C, Liu X, Dong C, Zhang X Herz. 2015; 41(3):246-9.

PMID: 26525521 DOI: 10.1007/s00059-015-4359-3.


References
1.
Noma A, TRAUTWEIN W . Relaxation of the ACh-induced potassium current in the rabbit sinoatrial node cell. Pflugers Arch. 1978; 377(3):193-200. DOI: 10.1007/BF00584272. View

2.
Noma A, Morad M, Irisawa H . Does the "pacemaker current" generate the diastolic depolarization in the rabbit SA node cells?. Pflugers Arch. 1983; 397(3):190-4. DOI: 10.1007/BF00584356. View

3.
Isenberg G . Cardiac Purkinje fibers: cesium as a tool to block inward rectifying potassium currents. Pflugers Arch. 1976; 365(2-3):99-106. DOI: 10.1007/BF01067006. View

4.
Belardinelli L, Fenton R, West A, Linden J, Althaus J, BERNE R . Extracellular action of adenosine and the antagonism by aminophylline on the atrioventricular conduction of isolated perfused guinea pig and rat hearts. Circ Res. 1982; 51(5):569-79. DOI: 10.1161/01.res.51.5.569. View

5.
Noma A, Irisawa H . The effect of sodium ion on the initial phase of the sinoatrial pacemaker action potentials in rabbits. Jpn J Physiol. 1974; 24(6):617-32. DOI: 10.2170/jjphysiol.24.617. View