FDG-PET-based Brain Network Analysis: a Brief Review of Metabolic Connectivity

Overview

Journal EJNMMI Rep

Publisher Springer Nature

Date 2025 Jan 19

PMID 39828812

Authors

Pham Minh Tuan

Mouloud Adel

Nguyen Linh Trung

Tatiana Horowitz

Ismail Burak Parlak

Eric Guedj

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Over the past decades, the analysis metabolic connectivity patterns has received significant attention in exploring the underlying mechanism of human behaviors, and the neural underpinnings of brain neurological disorders. Brain network can be considered a powerful tool and play an important role in the analysis and understanding of brain metabolic patterns. With the advantages and emergence of metabolic-based network analysis, this study aims to systematically review how brain properties, under various conditions, can be studied using Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography (FDG-PET) images and graph theory, as well as applications of this approach. Additionally, this study provides a brief summary of graph metrics and their uses in studying and diagnosing different types of brain disorders using FDG-PET images.

Main Body: In this study, we used several databases in Web of Science including Web of Science Core Collection, MEDLINE to search for related studies from 1980 up to the present, focusing on FDG-PET images and graph theory. From 68 articles that matched our keywords, we selected 28 for a full review in order to find out the most recent findings and trends. Our results reveal that graph theory and its applications in analyzing metabolic connectivity patterns have attracted the attention of researchers since 2015. While most of the studies are focusing on group-level based analysis, there is a growing trend in individual-based network analysis. Although metabolic connectivity can be applied to both neurological and psychiatric disorders, the majority of studies concentrate on neurological disorders, particularly Alzheimer's Disease and Parkinson's Disease. Most of the findings focus on changes in brain network topology, including brain segregation and integration.

Conclusion: This review provides an insight into how graph theory can be used to study metabolic connectivity patterns under various conditions including neurological and psychiatric disorders.

References

Yao Z, Hu B, Zheng J, Zheng W, Chen X, Gao X . A FDG-PET Study of Metabolic Networks in Apolipoprotein E ε4 Allele Carriers. PLoS One. 2015; 10(7):e0132300. PMC: 4498596. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132300. View

Watts D, Strogatz S . Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks. Nature. 1998; 393(6684):440-2. DOI: 10.1038/30918. View

Ren S, Huang Q, Bao W, Jiang D, Xiao J, Li J . Metabolic Brain Network and Surgical Outcome in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy: A Graph Theoretical Study Based on F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET. Neuroscience. 2021; 478:39-48. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2021.10.012. View

Wang M, Jiang J, Yan Z, Alberts I, Ge J, Zhang H . Individual brain metabolic connectome indicator based on Kullback-Leibler Divergence Similarity Estimation predicts progression from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's dementia. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020; 47(12):2753-2764. PMC: 7567735. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-020-04814-x. View

Medaglia J, Lynall M, Bassett D . Cognitive network neuroscience. J Cogn Neurosci. 2015; 27(8):1471-91. PMC: 4854276. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00810. View

Bassett D, Bullmore E . Small-world brain networks. Neuroscientist. 2006; 12(6):512-23. DOI: 10.1177/1073858406293182. View

Yao Z, Hu B, Chen X, Xie Y, Gutknecht J, Majoe D . Learning Metabolic Brain Networks in MCI and AD by Robustness and Leave-One-Out Analysis: An FDG-PET Study. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2017; 33(1):42-54. PMC: 10852436. DOI: 10.1177/1533317517731535. View

Ge J, Wang M, Lin W, Wu P, Guan Y, Zhang H . Metabolic network as an objective biomarker in monitoring deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease: a longitudinal study. EJNMMI Res. 2020; 10(1):131. PMC: 7596139. DOI: 10.1186/s13550-020-00722-1. View

Peng L, Zhang Z, Chen X, Gao X . Alternation of the Rich-Club Organization of Individual Brain Metabolic Networks in Parkinson's Disease. Front Aging Neurosci. 2022; 14:964874. PMC: 9304954. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.964874. View

10.

Meunier D, Lambiotte R, Bullmore E . Modular and hierarchically modular organization of brain networks. Front Neurosci. 2010; 4:200. PMC: 3000003. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2010.00200. View

11.

Bullmore E, Bassett D . Brain graphs: graphical models of the human brain connectome. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2010; 7:113-40. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-040510-143934. View

12.

Qi S, Meesters S, Nicolay K, Romeny B, Ossenblok P . The influence of construction methodology on structural brain network measures: A review. J Neurosci Methods. 2015; 253:170-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.06.016. View

13.

Jie B, Wee C, Shen D, Zhang D . Hyper-connectivity of functional networks for brain disease diagnosis. Med Image Anal. 2016; 32:84-100. PMC: 5333488. DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2016.03.003. View

14.

Pakkenberg B, Pelvig D, Marner L, Bundgaard M, Gundersen H, Nyengaard J . Aging and the human neocortex. Exp Gerontol. 2003; 38(1-2):95-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0531-5565(02)00151-1. View

15.

Park H, Friston K . Structural and functional brain networks: from connections to cognition. Science. 2013; 342(6158):1238411. DOI: 10.1126/science.1238411. View

16.

Wang K, Hu W, Liu T, Zhao X, Han C, Xia X . Metabolic covariance networks combining graph theory measuring aberrant topological patterns in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2018; 25(3):396-408. PMC: 6488969. DOI: 10.1111/cns.13073. View

17.

Bessadok A, Mahjoub M, Rekik I . Graph Neural Networks in Network Neuroscience. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2022; 45(5):5833-5848. DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2022.3209686. View

18.

Lord L, Stevner A, Deco G, Kringelbach M . Understanding principles of integration and segregation using whole-brain computational connectomics: implications for neuropsychiatric disorders. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2017; 375(2096). PMC: 5434074. DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2016.0283. View

19.

de Lange S, Scholtens L, van den Berg L, Boks M, Bozzali M, Cahn W . Shared vulnerability for connectome alterations across psychiatric and neurological brain disorders. Nat Hum Behav. 2019; 3(9):988-998. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-019-0659-6. View

20.

Tzourio-Mazoyer N, Landeau B, Papathanassiou D, Crivello F, Etard O, Delcroix N . Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. Neuroimage. 2002; 15(1):273-89. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0978. View