» Articles » PMID: 39826039

Beneficial Death: A Substantial Element of Evolution?

Overview
Journal Biogerontology
Date 2025 Jan 18
PMID 39826039
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

If a shortened lifespan is evolutionarily advantageous, it becomes more likely that nature will strive to change it accordingly, affecting how we understand aging. Premature mortality because of aging would seem detrimental to the individual, but under what circumstances can it be of value? Based on a relative incremental increase in fitness, simulations were performed to reveal the benefit of death. This modification allows for continuous evolution in the model and establishes an optimal lifespan even under challenging conditions. As a result, shorter-lived individuals achieve faster adaptation through more frequent generational turnover, displacing longer-lived ones and likely providing a competitive advantage between species. Contrary to previous assumptions, this work proposes a mechanism by which early death, e.g., due to aging, may contribute to evolution.

References
1.
Bi K, Bogart J . Time and time again: unisexual salamanders (genus Ambystoma) are the oldest unisexual vertebrates. BMC Evol Biol. 2010; 10:238. PMC: 3020632. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-10-238. View

2.
Blount Z, Barrick J, Davidson C, Lenski R . Genomic analysis of a key innovation in an experimental Escherichia coli population. Nature. 2012; 489(7417):513-8. PMC: 3461117. DOI: 10.1038/nature11514. View

3.
Cohen A, Kennedy B, Anglas U, Bronikowski A, Deelen J, Dufour F . Lack of consensus on an aging biology paradigm? A global survey reveals an agreement to disagree, and the need for an interdisciplinary framework. Mech Ageing Dev. 2020; 191:111316. PMC: 7603428. DOI: 10.1016/j.mad.2020.111316. View

4.
Goldsmith T . Aging as an evolved characteristic - Weismann's theory reconsidered. Med Hypotheses. 2004; 62(2):304-8. DOI: 10.1016/S0306-9877(03)00337-2. View

5.
Goldsmith T . Aging, evolvability, and the individual benefit requirement; medical implications of aging theory controversies. J Theor Biol. 2008; 252(4):764-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.02.035. View