» Articles » PMID: 39824291

Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Xpert® Mpox and STANDARD™ M10 MPX/OPX for the Detection of Monkeypox Virus

Abstract

Objectives: Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of two point-of-care (POC) molecular diagnostic tests for the detection of monkeypox virus (MPXV): Xpert® Mpox (Cepheid, Inc., USA) and STANDARD™ M10 MPX/OPX (SD Biosensor, Inc., Korea).

Methods: Diagnostic accuracy of both POC platforms was evaluated using 53 upper-respiratory swabs (URS) and 32 skin lesions swabs (SS) collected from mpox and COVID-19 patients in the UK against the Sansure (Sansure Biotech Inc.) and CDC reference qPCR tests. The analytical sensitivity of both platforms was assessed using a viral isolate from II, B.1 lineage.

Results: The overall sensitivity and specificity of the Xpert® Mpox was 97.67% [95% CI 87.71-99.94%] and 88.57% [95% CI 73.26-96.80%] and 97.44% [95% CI 86.52-99.94%] and 74.42% [95% CI 58.83-86.48%] comparing the Sansure and CDC qPCR, respectively and for the M10 MPX/OPX was 87.80% [95% CI 73.80-95.92%] and 76.60% [95% CI 61.97-87.70%] and 94.29% [95% CI 80.84-99.30%] and 86.67% [95% CI 73.21-94.95%] with the Sansure and CDC qPCR.

Conclusion: The Xpert® Mpox had good diagnostic accuracy for both sample types while the M10 MPX/OPX clinical accuracy was deficient with URS. Our data supports the use of URS during the first 3 days of symptoms onset for mpox diagnosis.

References
1.
Evans C . GeneXpert--a game-changer for tuberculosis control?. PLoS Med. 2011; 8(7):e1001064. PMC: 3144196. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001064. View

2.
Tarin-Vicente E, Alemany A, Agud-Dios M, Ubals M, Suner C, Anton A . Clinical presentation and virological assessment of confirmed human monkeypox virus cases in Spain: a prospective observational cohort study. Lancet. 2022; 400(10353):661-669. PMC: 9533900. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01436-2. View

3.
Palich R, Burrel S, Monsel G, Nouchi A, Bleibtreu A, Seang S . Viral loads in clinical samples of men with monkeypox virus infection: a French case series. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022; 23(1):74-80. PMC: 9534074. DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00586-2. View

4.
Ouafi M, Regueme A, Alcaraz I, Riviere P, Bazus H, Salmon-Rousseau A . Oropharyngeal samples versus lesion specimens at diagnosis in patients infected with monkeypox virus in Northern France. J Med Virol. 2022; 95(1):e28276. DOI: 10.1002/jmv.28276. View

5.
Wu F, Oghuan J, Gitter A, Mena K, Brown E . Wide mismatches in the sequences of primers and probes for monkeypox virus diagnostic assays. J Med Virol. 2022; 95(1):e28395. DOI: 10.1002/jmv.28395. View