Indication of Air Pollution Based on the Comparison of Mercury and Other Elements in the Faeces of Marmots from the Western Carpathians and the Dzungarian Alatau

Overview

Journal Environ Sci Pollut Res Int

Publisher Springer

Date 2025 Jan 17

PMID 39821873

Authors

Martina Haas

Katarina Tomikova

Marian Janiga

Aibek Abduakassov

Zuzana Kompisova Ballova

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The Dzungarian Alatau in Central Asia and the Western Carpathians in Central Europe are exposed to anthropogenic sources of pollution that are impacting high-altitude mountain systems through long-range transport of emissions. Based on analyses of the autumn faeces of two species of marmots (Marmota baibacina from the alpine habitats of Zhongar Alatau National Park, Marmota marmota latirostris from the alpine habitats of the Western Tatras), we determined the environmental load of mercury and other chemical elements. Our results show significantly higher levels of total mercury amounts (p < 0.0001) in faeces of marmots from the Western Tatras, Slovakia (mean = 0.066 µg/g dry weight; SD = 0.43), than in Zhongar Alatau National Park, Kazakhstan (mean = 0.034 µg/g dry weight; SD = 0.01), as well as sulphur and heavy metals (Ba, Mn, Mo, Zn, Cu, and Cr) that originate from anthropogenic activities. Other significant differences in levels of mineral nutrients (K, Cl, Ca, Fe) and Sr rather indicate differences in food sources reflecting environmental factors.

References

Miskowiec P . The impact of the mountain barrier on the spread of heavy metal pollution on the example of Gorce Mountains, Southern Poland. Environ Monit Assess. 2022; 194(9):663. PMC: 9365746. DOI: 10.1007/s10661-022-10316-0. View

Krabbenhoft D, Sunderland E . Environmental science. Global change and mercury. Science. 2013; 341(6153):1457-8. DOI: 10.1126/science.1242838. View

Kim K, Kabir E, Jahan S . A review on the distribution of Hg in the environment and its human health impacts. J Hazard Mater. 2016; 306:376-385. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.11.031. View

Ye B, Kim B, Jeon M, Kim S, Kim H, Jang T . Evaluation of mercury exposure level, clinical diagnosis and treatment for mercury intoxication. Ann Occup Environ Med. 2016; 28:5. PMC: 4724159. DOI: 10.1186/s40557-015-0086-8. View

Chetelat J, Ackerman J, Eagles-Smith C, Hebert C . Methylmercury exposure in wildlife: A review of the ecological and physiological processes affecting contaminant concentrations and their interpretation. Sci Total Environ. 2019; 711:135117. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135117. View

Cherednichenko V, Cherednichenko A, Cherednichenko A, Zheksenbaeva A, Madibekov A . Heavy metal deposition through precipitation in Kazakhstan. Heliyon. 2021; 7(1):e05844. PMC: 7814111. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05844. View

Ackerman J, Eagles-Smith C . Agricultural wetlands as potential hotspots for mercury bioaccumulation: experimental evidence using caged fish. Environ Sci Technol. 2010; 44(4):1451-7. DOI: 10.1021/es9028364. View

Stankwitz C, Kaste J, Friedland A . Threshold increases in soil lead and mercury from tropospheric deposition across an elevational gradient. Environ Sci Technol. 2012; 46(15):8061-8. DOI: 10.1021/es204208w. View

De Temmerman L, Ruttens A, Waegeneers N . Impact of atmospheric deposition of As, Cd and Pb on their concentration in carrot and celeriac. Environ Pollut. 2012; 166:187-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2012.03.032. View

10.

Amadi C, Frazzoli C, Orisakwe O . Sentinel species for biomonitoring and biosurveillance of environmental heavy metals in Nigeria. J Environ Sci Health C Toxicol Carcinog. 2020; 38(1):21-60. DOI: 10.1080/26896583.2020.1714370. View

11.

Zhang Q, Huang J, Wang F, Mark L, Xu J, Armstrong D . Mercury distribution and deposition in glacier snow over western China. Environ Sci Technol. 2012; 46(10):5404-13. DOI: 10.1021/es300166x. View

12.

cadkova Z, Vorechovska L, Javorska D, Szakova J, Tlustos P . The oral bioavailability of soil-borne risk elements for small terrestrial mammals: Microtus arvalis (Pallas, 1778) and Apodemus sylvaticus L. and its implication in environmental studies. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023; 30(22):62397-62409. PMC: 10167179. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-023-26437-z. View

13.

Rafferty K, Heaney R . Nutrient effects on the calcium economy: emphasizing the potassium controversy. J Nutr. 2007; 138(1):166S-171S. DOI: 10.1093/jn/138.1.166S. View

14.

Tekeli I, Yipel M, Sengul S, Sakin F . Levels of Metals and Organochlorine Pesticides in Kidney, Liver, and Muscle Tissues of Wild Boars (Sus scrofa) from Hatay Province, Eastern Mediterranean Region, Turkey. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2021; 106(2):257-263. DOI: 10.1007/s00128-020-03072-9. View

15.

Peterson S, Ackerman J, Hartman C, Casazza M, Feldheim C, Herzog M . Mercury exposure in mammalian mesopredators inhabiting a brackish marsh. Environ Pollut. 2021; 273:115808. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115808. View

16.

Ackerman J, Overton C, Casazza M, Takekawa J, Eagles-Smith C, Keister R . Does mercury contamination reduce body condition of endangered California clapper rails?. Environ Pollut. 2012; 162:439-48. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2011.12.004. View

17.

Hylander L, Goodsite M . Environmental costs of mercury pollution. Sci Total Environ. 2006; 368(1):352-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.11.029. View

18.

Cui Y, Zhu Y, Zhai R, Chen D, Huang Y, Qiu Y . Transfer of metals from soil to vegetables in an area near a smelter in Nanning, China. Environ Int. 2004; 30(6):785-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2004.01.003. View

19.

Huang J, Gustin M . Use of passive sampling methods and models to understand sources of mercury deposition to high elevation sites in the Western United States. Environ Sci Technol. 2014; 49(1):432-41. DOI: 10.1021/es502836w. View

20.

Kobayashi T, K Nishizawa N . Iron uptake, translocation, and regulation in higher plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2012; 63:131-52. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042811-105522. View