» Articles » PMID: 39821663

Can PSMA PET Detect Intratumour Heterogeneity in Histological PSMA Expression of Primary Prostate Cancer? Analysis of [Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and [F]PSMA-1007

Abstract

Purpose: Prostate-specific membrane-antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA PET) is a promising candidate for non-invasive characterization of prostate cancer (PCa). This study evaluated whether PET with tracers [Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 or [F]PSMA-1007 is capable to depict intratumour heterogeneity of histological PSMA expression.

Methods: Thirty-five patients with biopsy-proven primary PCa without evidence of metastatic disease nor prior interventions were prospectively enrolled. All patients underwent PSMA PET combined with computer tomography (CT) with either [Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 (cohort I, 20 patients) or [F]PSMA-1007 (cohort II, 15 patients) followed by radical prostatectomy. Specimens were scanned by ex-vivo CT and histologically prepared. On digitized whole-mount prostate sections, PCa areas with different morphologies were manually defined and H-Score of immunohistochemical PSMA expression was calculated with assistance by artificial intelligence (AI). PCa areas with similar H-Score were unified in segmentation on ex-vivo CT. After co-registration on PSMA PET-CT, Spearman's coefficients of PSMA expression to mean and maximum standardized uptake value (SUV and SUV) were calculated. Furthermore, the agreement of the co-registered tumour areas to gross tumour volume (GTV) in PSMA PET was analysed.

Results: Thirty-two patients were included in the final analysis. For histological PCa areas, immunohistochemical PSMA expression correlated significantly to SUV and SUV (p < 0.001, p = 0.001). An approximate linear correlation between H-Score and SUV / SUV was found for tumour areas larger than 400 μm² in histology (p < 0.001). Tumour areas with strong PSMA expression showed a significantly larger overlap to GTV in PSMA PET after co-registration than tumour areas with very low PSMA expression (p < 0.01). No significant differences were found between the two tracer cohorts (p = 0.72).

Conclusion: PSMA PET with both [Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 or [F]PSMA-1007 is able to detect changes in histological PSMA expression within PCa lesions allowing biologically targeted radiotherapy.

References
1.
Haffner M, Zwart W, Roudier M, True L, Nelson W, Epstein J . Genomic and phenotypic heterogeneity in prostate cancer. Nat Rev Urol. 2020; 18(2):79-92. PMC: 7969494. DOI: 10.1038/s41585-020-00400-w. View

2.
Zattoni F, Marra G, Martini A, Kasivisvanathan V, Grummet J, Harkin T . Is There an Impact of Transperineal Versus Transrectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy on the Risk of Upgrading in Final Pathology in Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy? An European Association of Urology-Young.... Eur Urol Focus. 2023; 9(4):621-628. DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.01.016. View

3.
Wu S, Feldman A, Kim M, Lin S, Cornejo K, Harisinghani M . Gleason Grade Group Concordance between Systematic Template Combining Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Targeted Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Specimens: A Comparison of Transperineal and Transrectal Approaches. Urology. 2023; 175:151-156. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.02.001. View

4.
Taggart R, Dutto L, Leung H, Salji M, Ahmad I . A contemporary analysis of disease upstaging of Gleason 3 + 3 prostate cancer patients after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Cancer Med. 2023; 12(22):20830-20837. PMC: 10709727. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6651. View

5.
Loeb S, Vellekoop A, Ahmed H, Catto J, Emberton M, Nam R . Systematic review of complications of prostate biopsy. Eur Urol. 2013; 64(6):876-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.049. View