» Articles » PMID: 39821495

Efficiency of Glass Ionomer Sealant Application in Reducing Hypersensitivity in MIH-molars in Schoolchildren Immediately and After 12 Weeks

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2025 Jan 17
PMID 39821495
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: This prospective clinical study aimed to clinically investigate the efficiency of (GIC) glass-ionomer cement application (Ionostar Plus + Easy Glaze, VOCO) in reducing hypersensitivity in permanent molars affected by molar incisor hypomineralisation when assessed immediately (15 min) and 12 weeks after its application.

Materials And Methods: Children with at least one hypersensitive MIH-affected permanent molar (MIH-TNI-3 or 4). The pre-treatment status was evaluated and only included if they did not receive a tooth-specific in-office desensitizing treatment within one month. Clinical pain assessments were performed using the schiff score air sensitivity scale (SCASS) and Wong-baker faces Scale (WBFS).

Results: This study involved 25 participants (mean age 8.6 ± 1.85 years) with 43 hypersensitive MIH-molars of which about half were SCASS 3 (n = 24, 55.8%) and SCASS 2 (n = 19, 44.2%). Regarding hypersensitivity, the reported mean SCASS score reduced significantly from 2.56 (± 0.50) at baseline to 1.14 (± 0.96) after 15 min of GIC sealant application and even further to 0.71 (± 0.89) after 12 weeks (P < 0.001, Paired t test). Similarly, reported WBFS scores also significantly reduced from 5.81 (± 2.50; Range = 2-10) at baseline to 2.88 (± 2.31; Range = 0-10) after 15 min and to 2.95 (± 2.17) after 12 weeks, respectively (P < 0.001, Paired t test). The mean reduction in SCASS scores was 1.3 (± 0.6) and 1.4 (± 1.0) for baseline SCASS 2 vs. 3, respectively.

Conclusion: GIC coverage is effective in providing clear instant relief from hypersensitivity in MIH molars in schoolchildren, which improves even further over a period of 12 weeks.

Citing Articles

Comparison of Patient Acceptance and Caregiver Satisfaction of Glass-Ionomer Cement vs. Silver Fluoride/Potassium Iodide Application to Manage Molar Incisor Hypomineralisation Hypersensitivity Immediately and After 12 Weeks.

Karim R, Ahmed W, Baider M, Splieth C, Schmoeckel J Clin Pract. 2025; 15(2).

PMID: 39996699 PMC: 11854399. DOI: 10.3390/clinpract15020029.

References
1.
Al-Nerabieah Z, AlKhouli M, Dashash M . Parental satisfaction and acceptance of silver diamine fluoride treatment for molar incisor hypomineralisation in pediatric dentistry: a cross-sectional study. Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):4544. PMC: 10894263. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-55456-0. View

2.
Baroni C, Marchionni S . MIH supplementation strategies: prospective clinical and laboratory trial. J Dent Res. 2010; 90(3):371-6. DOI: 10.1177/0022034510388036. View

3.
Bekes K, Steffen R, Kramer N . Update of the molar incisor hypomineralization: Würzburg concept. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2023; 24(6):807-813. PMC: 10657291. DOI: 10.1007/s40368-023-00848-5. View

4.
Schuler I, Bock B, Heinrich-Weltzien R, Bekes K, Rudovsky M, Filz C . Status and perception of oral health in 6-17-year-old psychiatric inpatients-randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2017; 21(9):2749-2759. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-017-2077-3. View

5.
Bijur P, Silver W, Gallagher E . Reliability of the visual analog scale for measurement of acute pain. Acad Emerg Med. 2001; 8(12):1153-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2001.tb01132.x. View