» Articles » PMID: 39820735

Improved Positioning in Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy Using the EDGE MP1000 Surgical Robot

Overview
Journal J Robot Surg
Publisher Springer
Date 2025 Jan 17
PMID 39820735
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study investigated the impact of an improved body positioning on the effectiveness of EDGE MP1000 robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. We compared clinical data from 39 patients who underwent the procedure at Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University between November 2023 and May 2024. The control group (18 patients) received conventional positioning, while the experimental group (21 patients) received precise positioning, which included patient assessments, optimized positioning techniques, and enhanced nursing measures. Key metrics compared between the groups included the duration of postural placement, incidence of intraoperative stress injuries, and patient satisfaction. All procedures were successfully completed. The experimental group had a significantly shorter duration of postural placement (P < 0.001) and a lower incidence of intraoperative stress injuries (P = 0.023) compared to the control group. In addition, patient satisfaction was significantly higher in the experimental group (P < 0.001). These findings suggest that the implementation of precise positioning in EDGE MP1000 robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy enhances operational efficiency and surgeon satisfaction, while ensuring patient safety and comfort, supporting its clinical adoption.

References
1.
Gao Y, Yang Y, Niu S, He W, Tao J, Guo S . Suitability of the MP1000 system for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a multicenter randomized controlled noninferiority trial. Int J Surg. 2024; 110(5):2803-2809. PMC: 11093472. DOI: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001166. View

2.
Kaouk J, Valero R, Sawczyn G, Garisto J . Extraperitoneal single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: initial experience and description of technique. BJU Int. 2019; 125(1):182-189. DOI: 10.1111/bju.14885. View

3.
Smet S, de Graaf A, Bernaerts K, Casaer M, Beeckman D . The Belgian pressure ulcer risk assessment project: Is assessing mobility and skin status a more accurate, reliable, and feasible approach to assess pressure ulcer risk in hospitalised patients?. Int Wound J. 2019; 16(6):1577-1578. PMC: 7948716. DOI: 10.1111/iwj.13240. View

4.
Shiferaw W, Akalu T, Mulugeta H, Aynalem Y . The global burden of pressure ulcers among patients with spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020; 21(1):334. PMC: 7260823. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-020-03369-0. View

5.
Wang Y, Ai Q, Zhao W, Gao Y, Liu Q, Shi T . Safety and Reliability of a Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Telesurgery System: Expanding Indications in Urological Surgery. Eur Urol. 2023; 85(5):506-507. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.11.002. View